A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of the Medication for Osteoporosis

골다공증 치료약제의 비용-효과 분석

  • 임지영 (서울대학교 보건대학원 보건정책관리학과) ;
  • 권순만 (서울대학교 보건대학원 보건정책관리학과)
  • Published : 2001.09.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of four medications for treating and preventing osteoporosis -HRT therapy(conjugated equine estrogen 0.625mg for 25 days and medroxyprogesterone acetate 5mg for 01112 days), Alendronate(10mg and 5mg), Active Vitamin D(Calcitriol), and Calcium. Total costs include the direct medical cost -examination fee, consultation fee, prescription fee, fee for preparing medications, and the price of pharmaceuticals- and the indirect cost of patients such as traffic expenses and time cost. In addition, the costs of monitoring in adverse reactions are added. The effects of four medications are expressed as BMD(Bone Mineral Density) percent change measured by DEXA(Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) in lumbar spine(L2-L4) and femoral neck site. A mixed model based on meta analysis provides the estimates of effectiveness, which are then appled to the hypothetical cohort consisting of postmenopausal women at the age of 50-59. HRT therapy is the most cost-effective medication at 172,433.64 won (lumbar spine site) and 546,328.28 won (femoral neck site) per BMD percent change for osteoporosis. Alendronate 10mg is more cost-effective than Alendronate 5mg as 345,971.23 won and 378,441.63 won per lumbar BMD percent change at 0.991g/$cm^2$, respectively. Alendronate 10mg is more cost-effective than Alendronate 5mg as 1,329,257.89 won and 1,467,291.23 won per femoral neck BMD percent change at 0.834g/$cm^2$, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. 대한골대사학회지 v.4 전북 정읍지역의 50새 이상 여성에서 골다공증 유병율 김철희(외)
  2. Pharm Manager v2.1 대한약사회
  3. OECD 국가 간 노인성 질환 치료의 비교방법 및 정책개발에 관한 연구 보건사회연구원
  4. 대한산부인과학회잡지 v.442 골밀도치에 따른 우리나라 여성의 골다공증 빈도 조수현(외)
  5. Osteoporosis Int v.6 Prevention of osteoporosis;Cosy-effectiveness of different pharmaceutical treatments Ankjaer-Jensen A(et al)
  6. Am J Med v.98(suppl 2A) The economic and human costs of osreoporosis fracture Barrett-Connor E
  7. JAMA v.263 Comparing benefits and harms;The balance sheet Eddy DM
  8. Osteoporosis Int v.5 Cost-effectiveniss of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis Jonssen B(et al)
  9. J Bone Miner Res v.12 Medical expenditure for the treatment of osteoporotic fracture in the United States in 1995;Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation Ray NF(et al)
  10. Osteoporosis Int v.7(supple 3) Epidemiology of osteoporosis in Korea Rowe SM(et al)
  11. Maturitas v.26 Estimating the cost per avoided hip fracture by osteoporosis treatment in Italy Visentin P(et al)