대한전기학회논문지:전력기술부문A (The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers A)

대한전기학회 (The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers)
권호 표지

송전요금 결정을 위한 전력조류 추적법의 도입 및 효용성 검증

Introduction of Power Flow Tracing Method for Determination of Power Transmission Network Charge and Verification of Its Effectiveness

  • 발행 : 2002.02.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper describes methodologies to charge for power transmission network use. These methodologies are normally divided into two categories such as marginal cost method and embedded cost allocation method. This paper, first, discusses the possible problems that can occur when the marginal cost method is applied to pricing the transmission services. Next, the paper proposes a method to apply the electricity tracing method to the transmission network charge. The result of the electricity tracing method is then used in MW-mile method to charge individual loads for the use of transmission network. Effectiveness of the algorithm is verified by computer simulations and it is estimated that the results can be used to compute the cost of electric power transmission under deregulated environment in electric power industries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. H.H. Happ, 'Cost of Wheeling Methodologies', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 1994, pp. 147-156 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317547
  2. D. Shirmohammadi et al., 'Some Fundamental Technical Concepts about Cost Based Transmission Pricing', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, May 1996, pp. 1002-1008 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.496187
  3. M.C. Caramanis et al., 'The Cost of Wheeling and Optimal Wheeling Rates', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, February 1986, pp 63-73 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.1986.4334845
  4. M.C. Caramanis et al., 'WRATES: A Tool for Evaluating the Marginal Cost of Wheeling', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 4, No. 2, May 1989, pp. 594-605 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.193834
  5. R. Mukerji et al., 'Evaluation of Wheeling and Non-Utility Generation(NUG) Options using Optimal Power Flows', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 7, No. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 201-207 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.141704
  6. R.R. Kovacs, A.L. Leverett, 'A Load Flow Based Method for Calculating Embedded, Incremental and Marginal Cost of Transmission Capacity', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3, Feb. 1994, pp. 272-278 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317601
  7. D. Shirmohammadi et al., 'Evaluation of Transmission Network Capacity Use for Wheeling Transactions', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 4, No. 4, October 1989, pp. 1405-1413 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.41691
  8. J. Bialek, 'Topological Generation and Load Distribution Factors for Supplement Charge Allocation in Transmission Open Access', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 3, August 1997, pp. 1185-1193 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.630460
  9. H. Rudnick et al., 'Evaluation of Alternatives for Power System Coordination and Pooling in a Competitive Environment', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 2, May 1997, pp. 605-613 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.589615
  10. C.W. Yu, A.K. David, 'Pricing Transmission Services in the Context of Industry Deregulation', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 12, No. 1, Feb 1997, pp. 503-510 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.575806
  11. J.W. Marangon Lima, 'Allocation of Transmission Fixed Charges: An Overview', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 11, No. 3, August 1996, pp. 1409-1418 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.535682
  12. H. Rudnick et al., 'Marginal Pricing and Supplement Cost Allocation in Transmission Open Access', IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, May 1995, pp. 1125-1142 https://doi.org/10.1109/59.387960
  13. W.Y. Ng, 'Generalized Generation Distribution Factors for Power System Security Evaluations', IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS-100, No. 3, March 1981, pp. 1001-1005 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1981.316635