An analysis of ITI implants placed in korean patients

한국환자에 매식된 ITI 임플란트에 관한 조사

  • Chang, Moon-Taek (Department of Periodontology, Institute of Oral Bio-Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 장문택 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 2002.06.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze various data of 120 non-submerged ITI implants placed in 64 korean adults. The data were retrieved from patients' charts and registered in the computer and coded for a statistical analysis. The results revealed that the most common type of edentulism was a distal extension case, and the largest number of implants were placed in the mandibular first molar position. Implants were placed more frequently in mandibular, posterior position than maxillary, anterior position, respectively. With respect to the implant diameter and length, an implant with 4.1mm in diameter and more than 10mm in length was the most common. Since a molar position was the most prevalent position for implant placement in korean patients, clinicians should be careful about implant diameter which can resist a strong occlusal force expected in the molar position. In addition, the distance to the mandibular canal and the floor of maxillary sinus should be considered to avoid possible damages, such as nerve injury and sinus perforation in selecting a proper implant length.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990 Winter;5(4):347-359
  3. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989 Fall;4(3):211-217
  4. Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:243-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90352-5
  5. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. In: Lang NP, Karring T, Lindhe J. eds. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology Implant dentistry 1999;242-254. Berlin: Quintessence Publ. Co
  6. Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G., Worthington, P.& Eriksson, A.R.(1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Summer;1(1):11-25
  7. Lekholm, U. & Jemt, T. (1989) Principles for single tooth replacement. In: Albrektsson, T.& Zarb, G.A. eds. The Branemark Osseointegrated Implant, 117-126. Chicago:Quintessence
  8. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981 Feb;9(1):15-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(81)80007-0
  9. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996 Sep;7(3):212-219.9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070303.x
  10. Buser, D., Mericske-Stern, R., Bernard, J.P., Behneke, A., Behneke, N., Hirt, H.P., Belser, U.C.& Lang, N.P. (1997) Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 8(3):161-72 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  11. Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, Duffort JF, Eller P, Justumus P, Marin P, Oscaby F, Simonet T, Benque E, Brunel G. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: a 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):691-700
  12. Randow K, Ericsson I, Nilner K, Petersson A, Glantz PO. Immediate functional loading of Branemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Feb;10(1):8-15 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100102.x
  13. Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, Ellner S, Chaffee N, Molina AL, Moriarty JD, Paquette D, Palmqvist U. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:182-192
  14. Buser, D., Belser, U.C.& Lang, N.P.(1998) The original one-stage dental implant system and its clinical application. Periodontol 2000 Jun;17:106-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00128.x
  15. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Dec;12(6):572-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x
  16. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 Aug;8(4):290-298 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
  17. Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):519-526
  18. Scacchi M. The development of the ITI DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Part 1: A review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:8-21 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1008.x
  19. Scacchi M, Merz BR, Schar AR. The development of the ITI DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Part 2: 1998-2000: Steps into the next millennium. Clin Oral Implants Res.2000;11 Suppl 1:22-32 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1022.x
  20. Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of literature supplied by system manufacturers. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Mar;77(3):271-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70184-7
  21. Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. In search of truth: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3(2):62-78 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00234.x
  22. Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:59-68 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001059.x
  23. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 May;60(2):325-332 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10063
  24. Belser, U.C., Buser, D., Hess, D., Schmid, B., Bernard, J-P. & Lang, N.P. (1998) Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients - a critical appraisal. Periodontology 2000 17: 132-150 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00131.x
  25. Hammerle CH, Lang NP.Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb;12(1):9-18 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001009.x
  26. Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B.The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):633-45
  27. Levine RA, Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG Jr, Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):516-20
  28. Witter DJ, Allen PF, Wilson NH, Kayser AF. Dentists' attitudes to the shortened dental arch concept. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Feb;24(2):143-7 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00460.x
  29. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):208-216
  30. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 Mar-Apr;14(2):173-180
  31. Yacker MJ, Klein M.The effect of irrigation on osteotomy depth and bur diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):634-638
  32. Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part I: Relationship between drill speed and heat production. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Sep-Oct;10(5):411-414
  33. Zarb, G.A. & Albrektsson, T. (1998) Consensus report: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics 11: 385-386, 389