대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제40권4호
  • /
  • Pages.365-373
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

상아질 지각완화제가 레진시멘트의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

EFFECT OF DENTIN DESENSITIZERS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENTS

  • 이호 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 진태호 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 손외수 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 안희영 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Lee Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jin Tai-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Son Oe-Soo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Ahn Hee-Young (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2002.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of desensitizer on shear bond strength of adhesive resin cements for all ceramic crown. For this study, Gluma $desensitizer^{(R)}$(Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) and MS $Coat^{(R)}$(Sun medical, Japan) were used as desensitizer, and Bistite $II^{(R)}$ resin cement(Tokuyama, Japan) and Variolink $II^{(R)}$ resin cement (Ivoclar, Liechtenstein) were used. IPS Empress ceramics were bonded to dentin surfaces after application of desensitizer and shear bond strength of specimens were measured using UTM(Zwick 1456 41. Zwick, Germany) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. The obtained results were as follows : 1. The shear bond strength of both resin cements were not affected by Gluma $desensitizer^{(R)}$ containing HEMA 2. The shear bond strength of Bistite $II^{(R)}$ resin cement was significantly decreased by MS $Coat^{(R)}$. 3. The failure mode in MS $Coat^{(R)}-Bistite \;II^{(R)}$ group was mainly adhesive type between dentin and resin cement. but that of Gluma $desensitizer^{(R)}$-Variolink $II^{(R)}$ group was mainly mixed type, combined adhesive failures between dentin and resin cement or porcelain and resin cement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brannstrom M, Aastrom A. The hydrodinamics of dentin: Its possible relationship to dentinal pain. Int Dent J 1972; 22: 219-227
  2. Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitivity and non-sensitive cervical dentin. J Clin periodontol 1987;14:280-28 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb01533.x
  3. Yoshiyama M, Noiri Y, Ozaki K, Uchida A, Ishikawa Y, and Ishida H. Transmission electron microscopic characterization of hypersensitive human radicular dentin, J Prosthet Dent 1990;69:1293-1297
  4. Lee IK, Han SB, Ko JS, and Kim HM. Clinical & scanning electron microscopic observations after treatment of dentine hypersensitivity in vivo. Kor J Periodontol 1990;20:371-383
  5. Abelson J. Cementation of cast complete crown retainers, J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43:174-179 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90184-5
  6. Greenhill JD, Pashley DH. The effects of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1981;60:686-698 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600030401
  7. Grossman LE. The treatment of hypersensitive dentin. J Am Dent Assoc 1935; 22:592-602
  8. Pashley DH, Derkson GD, Tao L, Derkson M, and Kalathoor S. The effects of a multi-step dentin bonding system on dentin permeability. Dent Mater J 1988;4:60-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80091-5
  9. Tagami J, Hosoda H, Imai Y, and Masuhara E. Evaluation of a new adhesive liner as an adhesive promotor and a desensitizer on hypersensitive dentin. Dent Mater J 1987;6:201-208 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.6.201
  10. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrate. J Biomed Mat Res 1982;16: 265-273 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307
  11. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. bonding to dentin. Quint Inter 1992; 23:39-41
  12. Suh BI. All-bond fourth generation dentin bonding system. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:139-147 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00986.x
  13. Suda R, Andoh Y, Shionome M, Hasegawa KK, Itoh K and Wakumoto S. Clincal evaluation of the sedative effect of HEMA solution on the hypersensitivity of dentin. Dent Mater J 1990;9:163-166 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.9.163
  14. Ueda M, Nakagaki N, and Yamaoka A. A clinical evaluation on a new dental adhesive restorative system 'Clearfil Liner Bond' (RTS-200) in hypersensitivity of dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 1992;35:903-910
  15. Yoshiyama M, Ozaki K, Noiri Y, Kataoka K, Nakanishi T, Ogimoto R, Nakae H, Matsuo T, and Ebisu S. Treatment of dentin hypersensitivity Effect of a light-curing resin liner on tubule occlusion. J J Opera Dent 1991;34:76-81
  16. Reinhardt JW, Stephens NH, Fortin D. Effect of Gluma desensitization on dentin bond strength. Am J Dent 1995;8:170-172
  17. Jean C, Stephante P, Jacques D, Jean CF. Effect of desensitizing agent on human dentin permeability. Am J Dent 1998;11:286-290
  18. Pashley DH. Mechanism of dentin s sensitivity. Dent Clin North Am 1990;34:449-473
  19. Pashley DH. Denting permeability. dentin sensitivity. and treatment through tubules occlusion. J Endodont 1986;12:465-474 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80201-1
  20. Greenhil J, Pashley D. The effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin in vitro. J Dent Res 1981;60: 686-698 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345810600030401
  21. Pashley DH, Depew DD. Effects of the smear layer, copalite, and oxalate on microleakage. Oper Dent 1986;11: 95-102
  22. Richardson DW, Tao L, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of luting cements to potassium oxalate-treated dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:418-422 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90230-A
  23. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, et al. Dentin permeability: Sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20
  24. Ianzano J, Gwinnett AJ, Westbay G. Polymeric sealing of dentinal tubules to control sensitivity. Periodont Clin Investig 1993;15:113-116
  25. Felton DA, Bergenhoitz G,Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma Dentin Bond on teeth prepared for complete-coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991;4:292-298
  26. Bergenhoiz G, Jonteil M, Tuttle A, et al. Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentine following conditioning with Gluma primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalate. J Dent 1993;21:220-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90133-B
  27. Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 1984;63:1087-1089 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630081701
  28. Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Dentinpolymer bond mediated by glutaraldehyde HEMA. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93:463-466
  29. Itoh K, and Wakumoto S. Momentary pretreatment by 35% HEMA solution combined with five marketed bonding agents. Dent Mater J 1986;6:28-31
  30. Nakabayashi N, and Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90067-M