DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Automatic Performance Tuning of PID Trajectory Tracking Controller for Robotic Systems

로봇 시스템에 대한 PID 궤적추종 제어기의 자동 성능동조

  • 최영진 (한국과학기술연구원 지능로봇 연구센터)
  • Published : 2004.06.01

Abstract

The PID trajectory tracking controller for robotic systems shows performance limitation imposed by inverse dynamics according to desired trajectory. Since the equilibrium point can not be defined for the control system involving performance limitation, we define newly the quasi-equilibrium region as an alternative for equilibrium point. This analysis result of performance limitation can guide us the auto-tuning method for PID controller. Also, the quasi-equilibrium region is used as the target performance of auto-tuning PID trajectory tracking controller. The auto-tuning law is derived from the direct adaptive control scheme, based on the extended disturbance input-to-state stability and the characteristics of performance limitation. Finally, experimental results show that the target performance can be achieved by the proposed automatic tuning method.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. Choi and W. K. Chung, 'On the optimality and performance of PID controller for robotic manipulators,' Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. On Robotics and Automation, pp. 1142-1148, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.2001.932765
  2. Y. Choi, W. K. Chung and I. H. Suh, 'Performance and $H_{\infty}$ optimality of PID trajectory tracking controller for lagrangian systems,' IEEE Trans. On Robotic and Automation, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1142-1148, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/70.976011
  3. K. Astrom and T. Hagglund, PID Controllers : Theory, Design, and Tuning, Instrument Society of America: Research Triangle Park, 1995
  4. J. B. He, Q. G. Wang and T. H. Lee, 'PI/PID controller tuning via LQR approach,' Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 55, pp. 2429-2439, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00512-6
  5. C. C. Yu, Autotuning of PID Controller: Relay Feedback Approach, Springer, 1999
  6. V. Chellaboina, W. M. Haddad and T. Hayakawa 'Direct adaptive control for nonlinear matrix second-order dynamical systems with state-dependent uncertainty,' Proc. of the American Control Conference, pp. 4247-4252, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2001.945644
  7. W. M. Haddad and T. Hayakawa 'Direct adaptive control for nonlinear systems with bounded energy $L_2$ disturbances,' Proc. of IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2419-2423, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2000.914163
  8. W. M. Haddad and T. Hayakawa 'Direct adaptive control for nonlinear uncertain systems with exogenous disturbances,' Proc. of the American Control Conference, pp. 4425-4429,2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2000.877060
  9. A. V. Roup and D. S. Bernstein, 'Stabilization of a class of nonlinear systems using direct adaptive control,' Proc. of the American Control Conference, pp. 3148-3152, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2000.879145
  10. J. Park, W. K. Chung and Y. Youm, 'Analytic nonlinear $H_{\tau}$ optimal control for robot mainipulators,' Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. On Robotics and Automation, pp. 2709-2715, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1109/ROBOT.1998.680755
  11. M. Krstic and Z. H. Li, 'Inverse optimal design of input-to-state stabilizing nonlinear controller,' IEEE Traㅜs. On Automatic Control, vol. 43, no.3, pp.336-350, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1109/9.661589
  12. M. Krstic, I. Kanellakopoulos, and P. V. Kokotovic, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design, John Wiley and Sons, 1995
  13. Y. Choi and W. K. Chung, 'PID performance tuning methods for a robotic manipulator,' Asian Journal of Control, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 206-216, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1934-6093.2003.tb00112.x