한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.320-326
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

수리 문제와 개념 문제 사이의 유도 효과

Inductive Influence of Algorithmic and Conceptual Problems

  • 발행 : 2004.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 화학 영역에서 수리 문제 해결과 개념 문제 해결이 서로 영향을 미치는지를 조사하였다. 서울 소재 고등학교에서 사전 화학 성적이 유사한 4학급(N=112)을 선정하여 AC(Algorithmic-Conceptual problem) 집단과 CA(Conceptual-Algorithmic problem) 집단으로 무선 할당하였다. AC 집단의 학생들은 수리 문제 해결에 대한 학습을 수행한 후 개념 문제를 해결하였으며, CA 집단의 학생들은 개념 문제 해결에 대한 학습을 수행한 후 수리 문제를 해결하였다. 연구 결과, 수리 문제 해결에 대한 학습은 관련된 개념 문제의 해결력을 향상시켰으나, 개념 문제 해결에 대한 학습은 관련된 수리 문제의 해결력에 도움이 되지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 문제 해결에 대한 자신감에서는 수리 문제 해결에 대한 학습이 관련된 개념 문제에 큰 영향을 주지 못했으며, 개념 문제 해결에 대한 학습도 관련된 수리 문제 해결에 대한 자신감에 큰 영향을 주지 못했다.

This study investigated whether algorithmic problem solving and conceptual problem solving influenced each other or not. Four classes of 12th grade (N= 112) that are equal in prior achievement were randomly assigned to group AC (Algorithmic-Conceptual problem) and group CA (Conceptual-Algorithmic problem). Students of group AC solved the conceptual problems after learning the related algorithmic problems, and those of group CA solved the same problems in reverse order. The results revealed that learning the algorithmic problems improved students' ability to solve the related conceptual problems, but learning the conceptual problems did not help students solve the related algorithmic problems. Regarding the confidence on problem solving, learning the algorithmic problems had little effect on the related conceptual problems. Learning the conceptual problems also had little effect on students' confidence on solving of the related algorithmic problems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 송인섭(2003). 통계학의 이해. 서울: 학지사
  2. Anderson, J. R.(1995). Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons
  3. Beall, H. & Prescott, S.(1994). Concepts and calculations in chemistry teaching and learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(2), 111-112 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed071p111
  4. Chiu, M.-H.(2001). Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry by students at a local high school in Taiwan. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China Part D: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 20-38
  5. Dukes, P., Pritchard, D. E., & Morote, E.-S.(2002). Inductive influence of related quantitative and conceptual problems. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (New Orleans, LA, April 6-10), ED 463978
  6. Gagne, E. D., Yekovish, C. W., & Yekovish, F. R.(1993). The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers
  7. Glaser, R.(1994). Learning theory and instruction. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.), International Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 2: The state of the art (pp. 341-357). Hove, UK: Larence Erlbaum Associates
  8. Heyworth, R. M.(1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195-211 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290787
  9. Kim, E. & Pak, S.-J.(2002). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 759-765 https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1484151
  10. Laurillard, D.(1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. New York: Routledge
  11. Nakhleh, M. B.(1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52-55 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p52
  12. Nakhleh, M. B., Lowrey, K. A., & Mitchell, R. C.(1996). Narrowing the gap between concepts and algorithms in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(8), 758-762 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed073p758
  13. Neto, A. & Valente, M. O.(1997). Problem solving in physics: Towards a metacognitively developed approach. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (70th, Oak Brook, IL, March 21-24), ED 405217
  14. Niaz, M.(1995). Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: A Lakatosian interpretation. Science Education, 79(1), 19-36 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790103
  15. Noh, T. & Scharmann, L. C.(1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199702)34:2<199::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-O
  16. Nurrenbem, S. C. & Pickering, M.(1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508-510 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed064p508
  17. Pushkin, D. B.(1998), Introductory students, conceptual understanding, and algorithmic success. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(7), 809-810 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed075p809
  18. Reid, N. & Yang, M.-J.(2002). The solving of problems in chemistry: The more open-ended problems. Research in science & Technological Education, 20(1), 83-98 https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140220130948
  19. Schrader, C. L.(1987). Using algorithms to teach problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 518-519 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed064p518
  20. Stewart, J.(1982). Two aspects of meaningful problem solving in science. Science Education, 66(7), 731-741 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660509
  21. Wolfer, A. J.(2000). Introductory college chemistry students' understanding of stoichiometry: Connections between conceptual and computational understandings and instruction. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University
  22. Zoller, U., Lubezky, A., Nakhleh, M. B., Tessier, B., & Dori, Y. J.(1995). Success on algorithmic and LOCS vs. conceptual chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(11), 987-989 https://doi.org/10.1021/ed072p987