Effect of embossed new dental pick on periodontitis

Embossed new dental pick이 치주염에 미치는 영향

  • Suk, Hun-Joo (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 석헌주 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 구강과학연구소)
  • Published : 2004.09.30

Abstract

Since bacterial plaque is known as the major cause of every oral disease, it is necessary to control plaque to maintain periodontal health. Although tooth brushing has been the typical method of plaque control, additional use of plaque control devices are necessary for cleansing interdental areas. Dental floss has been used for a long time as the additional plaque control device and proved to be effective. The newly developed embossed new dental pick is composed of elastic plastic material in form with its tip longer than other toothpick. In addition, as thickness of the tip gradually increases, it can be adapted easily with minimal trauma to interdental gingiva. The embossed tip can remove dental plaque easily, and the opposite end can approach lingual and palatal areas through triple angulation. Therefore, the authors studied the effect of embossed new dental pick and dental floss on periodontally involved 15 patient. The following results were obtained. 1. For embossed new dental pick, probing depth at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks were $3.6{\pm}0.6mm$, $3.4{\pm}0.5mm$, $3.2{\pm}0.5mm$, respectively, and $4.2{\pm}0.9mm$, $4.1{\pm}0.9mm$, $4.0{\pm}0.9mm$, respectivly for clinical attachment level. 2. In case of embossed new dental pick, bleeding on probing at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks were $43.0{\pm}4.4%$, $28.5{\pm}5.1%$, $22.2{\pm}5.6%$, respectively, and, at 1 week and 4 weeks, they were significantly different from that of dental floss. 3. Gingival index of toαhpick at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks were $1.7{\pm}0.5$, $1.0{\pm}0.3$, $0.9{\pm}0.2$, respectively, and, $1.7{\pm}0.5$, $1.1{\pm}0.4$, $1.0{\pm}0.4$, respectively for plaque index, and $3.0{\pm}0.5$, $1.7{\pm}0.5$, $1.4{\pm}0.4$, respectively for proximal plaque index. proximal plaque index at 4 weeks was significantly different from that of dental floss. 4. The result of questionnaire showed that the two types of device were both satisfactory, however, embossed new dental pick had higher preference as well as satisfaction. As a result, embossed new dental pick is thought to be clinically effective for its simplicity and good accessibility.

Keywords

References

  1. Ainamo J.: Control of plaque by chemical agent, J. Clin. Periodontol., 4: 23, 1977
  2. Theilade J.: Dental plaque & Dental calculus; In Lindhe J., Textbook of periodontology, 1983., Cophenhagen: Munksgaard
  3. Grossman E., Reiter G., Sturzenberger O. P., Six month study of the effects of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on gingivitis in adult, J. Periodont. Res. (Suppl), 16:33, 1986
  4. Berodn J. K., Hornbrook H. H., Hayduk S. E.: An evaluation of 6 manual toothbrushes comparing their effectiveness in plaque removal, J. Periodontol., 45: 496, 1974
  5. Burgett F. G., Ash M. M., Comparative study of the pressure of brushing with three types of toothbrushes, J. Periodontol., 45:410, 1974
  6. 정예진, 김창성, 서종진, 조규성, 채중규, 김종관, 최성호.: 치태제거 및 치은염증에 대한 실리콘 칫솔의 효과, 대한치주과학회지, 30 : 911-921, 2000
  7. Hine M. K.: The use of toothbrush in the treat-ment of periodontitis, J. A. D. A., 41: 158, 1950
  8. Hansen F., Gjermo P,. The plaque removing effect of Four toothbrushing methods, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 79: 502-506, 1971
  9. Sangnes G. B., Zachrisson B., Gjermo P.: Effectiveness of vertical and horizontal brushing in plaque removal, Journal of Dentistry for Children. 39: 94-97, 1972
  10. Wolffe G. N.: An evaluation of proximal surface cleansing agents, J. Clin. Periodontol., 3: 148-156, 1976
  11. Bergenholtz A., Brithon J.: Plaque removal by dental floss or toothpick, J. Clin. Periodontol., 7: 516-524, 1980
  12. Max O. S., Oreste P. B., Ulrich P. S.: Plaque-removing effect of a toothbrush, dental floss, and a toothpick, J. Clin. Periodontol., 3: 157-165, 1976
  13. Vassiliki C., Mark F. T., Ubele V., Fridus A. W.: Comparision of different approaches of inter-dental oral hygiene : Interdental brush versus dental floss, J. Periodontol., 69: 759-764, 1998
  14. Ong G.: The effectiveness of 3 types of dental floss for interdental plaque removal, J. Clin. Periodontol., 17:463-466, 1990
  15. Kiger R. D., Nylund K., Feller R. P.: A compari-sion of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes, J. Clin. Periodontol., 18: 681-684, 1991
  16. Carter H. C., Gadbury A. C., Killoy W.: Comparision of the plaque removal efficacy of a new flossing aid(Quik $Floss^{\circledR}$) to finger flossing, J. Clin. Periodontol., 23:873-878, 1996
  17. Gjermo P., Flotra L.: The Effect of different methods of interdental cleaning, J. Periodontal Res., 5: 230-236, 1970
  18. Schmid M., Balmelli O., Saxer U.: Plaque-removing effect of a toothbrush, dental floss and a toothpick, J. Clin. Periodontol., 3: 157-165, 1976
  19. Loe H.: The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index system, J. Periodontol., 38: 610, 1967
  20. Meitner S. W., Zander I. I., Polson A.: Identification of inflamed gingival surface, J. Clin. Periodontol., 6: 93-97, 1979