The Effect of Passive Joint Mobilization and Massge on subacute Lateral Ankle Ligament Injuroes

아급성기의 발목 외측 염좌 환자에게 수동적 관절가동기법과 마사지가 미치는 영향

  • Koo, Chang-Hoi (Department of Sport & Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, In-Hak (Department of Sport & Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Park, Kyoung-Lee (Department of Sport & Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapy Graduate School of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University) ;
  • Bae, Sung-Soo (Department of Physical therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University)
  • 구창회 (대구대학교 재활과학과 스포츠.정형물리치료) ;
  • 이인학 (대구대학교 재활과학과 스포츠.정형물리치료) ;
  • 박경리 (대구대학교 재활과학과 스포츠.정형물리치료) ;
  • 배성수 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Published : 2005.12.24

Abstract

Physiotherapyists frequently use manipulative therapy technique to treat dysfunctionand pain resulting from ankle sprain. Despite the high prevalence of lateral ankle ligament injuries, few studies are available indicating any physical associations with the development of lateral ankle ligament injuries, or information of treatment for lateral ankle ligament injuries. To investigate the effect of passive joint mobilization, the anteroposterior glide on the talus, on increasing weight-bearing dorsiflexion, single support time and VAS. Sixty lateral ankle ligament injuries (grade I and grade II) aged between 17 and 27 years (mean age 21) were recruited. Subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. The control group received a protocol of rest, ice, compression, and elevation (RICE) and massage. The experimental group received the anteroposterior mobilization, using a force that avoided incurring any increase in pain, in addition to the RICE protocol. Subjects in both groups were treated every second day for a maximum of 2 weeks or until the discharge criteria were met, and all subjects were given a home program of continued RICE application. Outcomes were measured after each treatment. The results showed that the experimental group than the control group. Weight-bearing dorsiflexion (F=7.640, P<0.05), single support time (F=85.532, P<0.05) and VAS (F=10.610, P<0.050). Between-groups differences were observed as; experimental group is increased weight-bearing dorsiflexion, single support time and reduced VAS.

Keywords