Designing a Supply Chain Coordinating Returns Policies for a Risk Sensitive Manufacturer

  • Lee, Chang-Hwan (Ajou University, School of Business Administration.) ;
  • Lim, Jay-Ick (Ajou University, School of Business Administration.)
  • Published : 2005.11.01

Abstract

In this article we consider a supply chain consisting of a risk-sensitive manufacturer and a riskneutral retailer. The manufacturer maximizes her individual expected profit by designing a supply chain coordinating returns contract (SCRC) that consists of (i) a channel coordinating returns policy that maximizes the supply chain joint expected profit, and (ii) a profit sharing arrangement that gives the retailer an expected profit only slightly higher than that in the no returns case so that it is just enough to induce the retailer to accept the SCRC. Thus, the manufacturer captures as high a percentage as possible of the jointly maximum supply chain profit. However, this contract can sometimes lead to the manufacturer's resulting realized profit being lower than that in the no returns case when demand is lower than expected. In this context, even though profit is sufficiently attractive on average, will the risk-sensitive manufacturer ever consider applying a SCRC? Our research raises this question and focuses on designing a SCRC that can significantly increase the probability of the manufacturer's resulting realized profit being at least higher than that in the no returns case.

Keywords

References

  1. Emmons, H. and S. M. Gilbert, 'The Role of Returns Policies in Pricing and Inventory Decision for Catalogue Goods,' Management Science 44,2 (1998), 276-283 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.2.276
  2. Kandel, E., 'The Right to Return,' Journal of Law and Economics 39, 1 (1996), 329-356 https://doi.org/10.1086/467351
  3. Khouja, M., 'The Single-period (News Vendor) Problem: Literature Review And Suggestions For Future Research,' OMEGA 27 (1999),537-553 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00017-1
  4. Lariviere, M. A., 'Supply Chain Contracting and Coordination with Stochastic Demand,' In: S. Tayur R. Ganeshan, and M. Magazine (eds.), Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management, Kluwer's Academic Publisher, Norwell, MA. 1999
  5. Lau, H. S., 'The News Boy Problem Under Alternative Optimization Objectives,' Journal of the Operational Research Society 31, 6 (1980), 525-535 https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1980.96
  6. Lau, H. S. and H. L. Lau, 'Manufacturer's Pricing Strategy and Return Policy for a Single-period Commodity,' European Journal of Operational Research 116 (1999), 291-304 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00123-4
  7. Lee, C. H., 'Coordinated Stocking, Clearance Sale, and Return Policies for a Supply Chain,' European Journal of Operational Research 131 (2001), 491-513 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00088-6
  8. Marval, H. P. and J. Peck, 'Demand Uncertainty and Return Policies,' International Economic Review 36,3 (1995), 691-714 https://doi.org/10.2307/2527367
  9. Pasternack, B. A., 'Optimal Pricing and Return Policies for Perishable Commodities,' Marketing Science 4,2 (1985), 166-176 https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.2.166
  10. Porteus, E. L., 'Stochastic Inventory Theory,' In D. Heyman, and M. Sobel (eds.), Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 2 (1990), Stochastic Models, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands
  11. Sankarasubramanian, E. and S. Kumaraswamy, 'Note on Optimal Ordering Quantity to Realize a Pre-determined Level of Profit,' Management Science 29 (1983), 512-514 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.4.512
  12. Tsay, A., 'Managing Retail Channel Overstock: Markdown Money and Returns Policy,' Journal of Retailing 77 (2001), 457-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00055-0
  13. Tsay, A., Risk Sensitivity In distribution Channel Partnership: Implications For Manufacturer Return Policies, Working Paper, Leavy School of Business, Santa Clara University, CA. 2002
  14. Webster, S. and Z. K. Weng, 'A Risk-Free Perishable Item Return Policy,' Manufacturing and Service Operations Management 2, 1 (2000), 100-106 https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2.1.100.23270