Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multi Trait Selection with Restriction for Cutup Carcass Value in Broiler Chicken: Genetic Relatedness of Lines Involved Based on Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA

  • Khosravinia, Heshmatollah (Dept. of Technology of Animal Products, Agriculture Faculty, Lorestan University) ;
  • Murthy, H.N.N. (Veterinary College, University of Agricultural Science) ;
  • Ramesha, K.P. (National Research Center on Yok) ;
  • Govindaiah, M.G. (Veterinary College, University of Agricultural Science)
  • Received : 2004.12.28
  • Accepted : 2005.05.11
  • Published : 2005.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Five broiler chicken lines, namely HC, BPB2, CPB2, PB2 and UM1, involving in a selection program and differing in selection intensity and genetic background, were screened for randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) polymorphism using 10 selected decamer primers. Nine primers amplified the genomic DNA, generating 200 to 2,500 bp and all detected polymorphism between lines. Out of 74 bands scored using these primers, 34 (50.0%) were found to be polymorphic. The number of polymorphic loci ranged from 3 to 6 with an average of 4.33. Lines differed considerably for within-population genetic similarity estimated by band frequency (WS = 93.55 to 99.25). Between-line genetic similarity estimates based on band sharing as well as on band frequency ranged from 71.35 to 86.45 and from 73.38 to 87.68, respectively. Lines HC and PB2 were the most closely related to the other, while BPB2 and CPB2 appeared to be more distant from each other. The between-line genetic distance based on both band sharing and band frequency revealed the similar trends as for Between-line genetic similarity. Based on BS and BF criteria, BPB2 and CPB2 as well as PB2 and UM1 lines can be merged to launch a new genetic group for further progress in biometrical objectives. A phylogenetic tree, derived using Nei's coefficient of similarity revealed the different pattern of genetic distance between lines.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahlawat, S. P. S., J. Sunder, A. Kundu, R. N. Chatterjee and R. B. Rai. 2004. Use of RAPD-PCR for genetic analysis of Nicobari fowl of Andamans. Br. Poult. Sci. 45:194-200.
  2. Ali, B. A., M. M. M. Ahmed and O. M. Ali. 2003. Relationship between genetic similarity and some productive traits in local chicken lines. African J. Biotech. 2:46-47.
  3. Bossak, N., T. Furukawa, A. Dmitriyev Smirnov and T. Mitsuhashi. 2001. Random amplified polymorphism DNA assay for detecting genetic variations in chicken subjected to long-term selection. IX Plant and Animal Genome Conference. San Diege, CA.
  4. Caetano-Anolles, G., B. J. Bassam and P. M. Gresshoff. 1991. DNA amplification fingerprinting using very short arbitrary oligonucleotide primers. Biotechnology 9:553-557.
  5. Dunnington, E. A., O. Gal, P. B. Siegel, A. Haberfeld, A. Cahaner, U. Lavi, Y. Plotsky and J. Hillel. 1991. Deoxyribonucleic acid fingerprint comparisons between selected populations of chickens. Poult. Sci. 70:463-467.
  6. Lynch, M. 1991. Analysis of population genetics structure by DNA fingerprinting, In: (Ed. T. Burke, G. Dolf, A. J. Jeffreys and R. Wolff) DNA fingerprinting: Approuches and applications, pp. 113-126 (Basel, Swizerland, Birkhauser Verlag AG).
  7. Nei, P. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583-590.
  8. Okimotto, R. and J. Dodgson. 1996. Improved PCR amplification of multiple specific alleles using internally mismatched primers. Biotechniques, 21:20-26.
  9. Plotsky, Y., M. G. Kaisar and S. J. Lamont. 1995. Genetic characterization of highly inbred chicken lines by two DNA methods: DNA fingerprinting and polymerase chain reaction using arbitrary primers. Anim. Genet. 26:163-170.
  10. Saifi, H. W., B. Bhushan, S. Kumar, P. Kumar, B. N. Patra and A. Sharma. 2004. Genetic identity between Bhadawari and Murrah breeds of Indian buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis) using RAPD-PCR. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(5):603-607.
  11. Sharma, D., K. B. Appa Rao, R. V. Singh and S. M. Totey. 1998. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for evaluating genetic relationship among guinea fowl varieties. Genetical analysis: Biomolecular engineering.
  12. Sharma, D., K. B. Appa Rao, R. V. Singh and S. M. Totey. 2001. Genetic diversity among chicken breeds estimated through randomly amplified polymorphisc DNA. Anim. Biothechnol. 12:111-120.
  13. Sharma, D. and R. V. Singh. 2001. Random amplified polymorphic DNA polymorphism in Rhode Island Red chicken. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 36:1-4.
  14. Sharma, A. K., R. K. Singh, S. Kumar and S. Sharma. 2001. Genetic differentiation of selected and control lines of White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red using DNA markers. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 36:5-8.
  15. Shivaraman, G. K., D. Sharma, S. Haunshi and A. K. Sharma. 2001. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA polymorphism among native and exotic chicken breeds. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 36:141-146.
  16. Singh, R. V. and D. Sharma. 2002. Within and between strain genetic variability in White Leghorn population detected through RAPD markers. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:33-37.
  17. Smith, E. J., C. P. Jones, J. Bartelett and K. E. Nestor. 1996. Use of Randomly Amplified polymorphic DNA markers for the genetic analysis of related ness and diversity in chickens and turkey. Poult. Sci. 75:579-584.
  18. Tercic, D., A. Holcman and P. Dovc. 1998. Three RAPD markers for growth performance in chicken. The VI Plant and Animal Genome Conference. San Diege, CA.
  19. Welsh, J. and M. McClelland. 1990. Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:7213-7218.
  20. Williams, J. G. K., A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski and S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA Polymorphism amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 14:4605-4616.
  21. Yoon, J. M. and J. Y. Kim. 2004. Genetic differences within and between populations of Korean Catfish (S. asotus) and Bullhead (P. fulvidraco) analysed by RAPD-PCR. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(8):1053-1061.
  22. Zhang, X., G. R. Mcdaniel and J. J. Giambrone. 1995. Random Amplified polymorphic DNA comparisons among broiler lines selected for incidence of tibial dyschondroplasia. Poult. Sci. 74:1253-1258.