Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

Prevalence of fimA Genotypes of Porphyromonas gingivalis Strains in peri-implantitis patients

임플란트주위염시 Porphyromonas gingivalis 섬모유전형의 출현율

  • 신승일 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권영혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박준봉 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 허익 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정종혁 (경희대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Fimbriae (fimA) of Porphyromonas gingivalis are filamentous components on the cell surface and are thought to play an important role in the colonization and invasion of periodontal tissue. P. gnigivalis fimA gene encoding fimbrillin, a subunit of fimbriae, has been classified into 5 genotypes (types I to V) based on the nucleotide sequences. In the present study, we examined the prevalence of these fimA genotypes in patients with dental implant and the relationship between prevalence of these genotypes and peri-implantitis. Dental plaque specimens obtained from 80 peri-implant sulci of 50 patients with dental implants were analyzed by 16S rRNA fimA gene-directed PCR assay. P. gingivalis were detected in 74.4% of the samples of the control group (healthy peri- implant sulci; probing depth<5mm) and in 92.0% of the samples of the test group (peri-implant sulci with peri-iimplantitis; probing $depth{\geqq}5mm$). Among the P. gingivalis-positive samples of the control group, the most prevalent fimA type was type I (29.3%), followed by type II (26.8%). In contrast, a majority among the P. gingivalis-positive samples of the test group was type II (56.S%), followed by type I (43.5%). TypeII fimA genotype organisms were detected more frequently in the test group and a significant difference in the occurrence of type II was observed between test and the control groups. A correlation between specific fimA types and peri-implant health status was found in type II (OR 3.545) and only a weak relationship was revealed in typeIV(OR 3.807). These findings indicate that P. gingivalis strains that possess type II fimA are predominant in peri-implant sulci with peri-implantitis and are closely associated with peri-implant health status. P. gingivalis with type II fimA may be involved in peri-implantitis.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Leckholm U, Rockler B, Br emark PI. A IS-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Jemt T, Leckholm U, Adell R Osseointe- grated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4: 211-217
  3. Jemt T, Leckholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635-640
  4. Leckholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Linden U, Bergstrom C, van Steen- berghe D. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:639-45
  5. Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1964 implants over 16 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:748-755
  6. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Leckholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. ( I )Successful criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-551 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
  7. Quirynen M, de Soete M, van Steen- berghe D. Infectious risks for oral im- plants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:1-19 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130101.x
  8. Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of periimplantitis. Per- iodontol 2000 1998;17:63-76 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00124.x
  9. Paster BJ, Boches SK, Galvin JL, Ericson RE, Lau CN, Levanos VA, Sahasrabudhe A, Dewhirst FE. Bacterial diversity in human subgingival plaque. J Bacterial 2001;183:3770-3783 https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.12.3770-3783.2001
  10. Heydenrijk K, Meijer HJ, van der Reijden WA, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Stegenga B. Microbiota around root- form endosseous implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:829-838
  11. Sumida S, Ishihara K, Kishi M, Okuda K. Transmission of periodontal disease- associated bacteria from teeth to osseointegrated implant region. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:696-702
  12. van Winkelhoff AJ, Goene R, Benshop C, Folmer T. Early colonization of dental implants by putative periodontal pathogens in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000;11:511-520 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006511.x
  13. Lee KH, Tanner AC, Maiden MF, Weber HP. Pre- and post-implantation microbiota of the tongue, teeth, and newly placed implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999;26:822-832 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1999.tb02527.x
  14. Listgarten MA, Lai CH. Comparative microbiological characteristics of failing implants and periodontally diseased teeth. J Periodontal 1999;70:431-437
  15. Amano A, Sojar HT, Lee JY, Sharma A, Levin MJ, Genco RJ. Salivary receptors for recombinant fimbrillin of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun 1994;62:3372-3380
  16. Golden, N.J., Acheson, D.W. Iden- tification of mobility and autoagglutina- tion Campylobater jejuni mutans by random transposon mutagenesis. Infect Immun 2002;70:1761-1771 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.4.1761-1771.2002
  17. Chiang SL, Taylor RK, Koomey M, MekalanosJJ. Single amino acid sub- stitutions in the N-terminus of Vibrio cholerae TcpA affect colonization, auto- agglutination, and serum resistance. Mol Microbiol 1995;17:1133-1142 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.mmi_17061133.x
  18. Lee JY, Sojar HT, Bedi GS, Genco RJ. Porphyromonas(Bacteroides) gingivalis fimbrillin: size, amino-terminal sequence, and antigenic heterogenecity. Infect Immun 1991;59:383-389
  19. Lee JY, Sojar HT, Amano A, Genco RJ. Purification of major fimbria I proteins of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Protein Expr Purif 1995;6:496-500 https://doi.org/10.1006/prep.1995.1066
  20. Amano A, Nakagawa I, Kataoka K, Morisaki I, Hamada S. Distribution of Porphyromonas gingivalis strains with fimA genotypes in periodontitis patients. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:1426-1430
  21. Nakagawa I, Amano A, Kimura RK, Nakamura T, Kawabata S, Hamada S. Distribution and molecular characteriza- tion of Porphyromonas gingivalis carry- ing a new type of funA gene. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:1909-1914
  22. Nakagawa I, Amano A, Ohara-Nemoto Y, Endoh N, Morisaki I, KImura S, Kawabata S, Hamada S. Identification of a new variant of fimA gene of Por- phyromonas gingivalis and its distribu- tion in adults and disabled population with periodontitis. J Periodontal Res 2002;37:425-432 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0765.2002.01637.x
  23. Amano A, Kuboniwa M, Nakagawa I, Akiyama S, Morisaki I, Hamada S. Prevalence of specific genotypes of Porphyromonas gingiva lis fimA and periodontal health status. J Dent Res 2000;79:1664-1668 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790090501
  24. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Bragger D, Hammerle CH, Lang, NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospec- tive cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:329-339 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x
  25. Mombelli A, van Oosten MAC, Schurch E, Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-151 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  26. Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical par- ameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:81-86 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00008.x
  27. Bragger D, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hammerle HFC, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial denture (FPD) on implant') and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:26-34 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x
  28. Hamada S, Amano A, Kimura RK, Nakagawa I, Kawabata S, Morisaki I. The importance of the fimbriae in the virulence and etiology of some oral bacteria. Oral Microbial Immunol 1998;13:129-138 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1998.tb00724.x
  29. Hamada S, Fujiwara T, Morishima T, Takahashi I, Nakagawa I, Kimura S, Ogawa T. Molecular and immunolocial charaterization of the fimbriae of Por- phyromonas gingivalis. Microbiol Immunol 1994;38:921-930
  30. Chen PB, Neiders ME, Millas SJ, Reynolds HS, Zambon JJ. Effect of immunization on experimental Bac- teroides gingivalis infection in a murine model, Infect Immun 1987;55:2534-2537
  31. Neiders NE, Chen PB, Suido H, Rey- nolds HS, Zambon JJ, Shlossman M, Genco RJ, Heterogeneity of virulence among strains of Bacteroides gingivalis. J Periodont Res 1989;24:192-198 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1989.tb02005.x
  32. Amana A, Shizukuish S. Plaque for- mation: involvement of salivary protein molecules. Dent Outlook 1996;87:217-227
  33. Naito Y, Tohda H, Okuda K, Takazoe I. Adherence and hydrophobicity of invasive and noninvasive strains of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Oral MIcrobiol Immunol 1993;8:195-202 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1993.tb00559.x
  34. Naito Y, Gibbons RJ. Attachment of Bacteroides gingivalis to collagenous substrata. J Dent Res 1988;67:1075-1080 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670080301
  35. Nakagawa I, Amana A, Kuboniwa M, Nakamura T, Kawabata S, Hamada S. Functional differences among fimA variants of Porphyromonas gingivalis and their effects on adhesion to and invasion of human epithelial cells. Infect Immun 2002;70:277-285 https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.70.1.277-285.2002
  36. van Steenbergen TJM, Kastelein P, Touw JJ, de Graaff J. Virulence of black-pigmented Bacteroides strains from periodontal pockets and other sites in experimentally induced skin lesions in mice. J Periodont Res 1982;17:41-49 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1982.tb01129.x