Full-Scale SBR 공법을 이용한 처리특성

Treatment Characteristics Using Full-Scale SBR System

  • 추태호 (부산대학교 산업토목과) ;
  • 이용두 (부산대학교 지역환경시스템학과) ;
  • 조용현 (동아대학교 토목공학과 상.하수도시스템연구실)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.28

초록

본 연구에서 연속회분식반응기(SBR)를 이용한 유기물질과 영양염류(N, P)처리가 수행되었다. 이 연구 결과들을 요약하면 다음과 같다. BOD는 $19.6{\sim}40.0mg/L$의 범위로 유입되고, 처리수는 $3.0{\sim}14.8mg/L$로 실험기간의 경과에 따라 점차 안정적으로 처리되었다. 이때의 제거율은 $47.9{\sim}88.4%$로 평균 80.0%로 안정적인 제거율을 보였다. 그리고 COD는 $12.2{\sim}32.0mg/L$의 범위로 유입되었으며, 처리수는 $3.3{\sim}18.6mg/L$로 제거율은 $19.2{\sim}78.6%$로 평균 57.3%의 제거율을 보였다. 하지만 79일 이후의 평균 COD 제거율은 70.2%로 안정적인 제거율은 보였다. T-N의 경우 유입농도는 $7.53{\sim}14.99mg/L$, 처리수는 초기 79일까지는 평균 6.59mg/L로 제거율이 평균 40.3%로 낮았지만 시스템이 정상화된 80일 이후는 평균 4.44mg/L로 처리되어 그 제거율이 56.4%로 나타났다. 또한 T-P의 경우는 유입수의 농도는 $0.77{\sim}1.91mg/L$, 처리수는 $0.26{\sim}1.53mg/L$으로 제거율이 $5.3{\sim}71.7%$로 상당히 큰 변화를 보였으며, 평균제거율은 42.6%로 나타났다. 이는 MLSS 증가를 위해 슬러지 인발을 하지 않았기 때문으로 판단된다.

In this study, the treatment of organic matters and nutrients like Nitrogen and Phosphorus with sequencing batch reactors (SBR) was conducted. The following conclusions can be summarized from the study. The influent BOD concentration was varied 19.6 to 40.0mg/L and the effluent was 3.0 to 14.8mg/L. The variations of BOD removal efficiency during the experimental period was $47.9{\sim}88.4%$ and the average was 80.8%. The average removal efficiency was stabilized with the passage of time. Also the COD concentration was flowed into as $12.2{\sim}32.0mg/L$ and the effluent concentration was varied 3.3 to 18.6 mg/L, and then the average COD removal efficiency was 57.3%(minimun 19.2% and maximum 78.6%). But fortunately, the COD removal efficiency was also stabilized as 70.2% after 79days. In the case of T-N, the influent concentration range was $7.53{\sim}14.99mg/L$ and the effluent concentration was 6.59mg/L(the average removal efficiency was 40.3%) until the first experiment time 79days. But after normalizing the system, it was 4.44mg/L (the average removal efficiency was 56.4%). Also the influent T-P concentration was varied from 0.77 to 1.91mg/L and the effluent concentration was $0.26{\sim}1.53mg/L$. The removal efficiency was varied from 5.3 to 71.7%. considerably, therefore the average removal efficiency was 42.6%. The reason was concluded that the sludge wasn't discharged for increasing MLSS concentration.

키워드