Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering (산업경영시스템학회지)

Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering (한국산업경영시스템학회)
권호 표지

Overlapping Design-Build-Test Cycles in Vehicle Development Process : System Dynamics Approach

시스템 다이나믹스를 이용한 자동차 개발 단계에서 Design-Build-Test Cycle의 중복에 대한 연구

  • 이상돈 (미국 미시간주 제너럴 모터스 기술센터) ;
  • 임익성 (남서울대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Published : 2006.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

자동차 개발 단계는, 본질적으로, 수차례의 개발 단계를 거치면서 설계 그룹들 간의 정보 전달과 교환이 여러 차례 반복적으로 발생하게 된다. 이러한 복잡한 상호 정보 교환 과정을 정확하게 이해하여 업무가 수행되지 못하면 불필요한 재작업을 야기시킬 수 있으며, 이는 비용 낭비 및 계획에 차질이 발생할 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 시스템 다이나믹 모델을 개발하여 빈번한 design-built-test 싸이클이 자동차 개발 단계에 미치는 영향 및 이점들을 고찰하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Blackburn, J. D.; New product development: the new time wars, In : Time-based competition,Business One Irwin, Homewood, IL., 1991
  2. Clark, K. B. and Fujimoto, T.; Product development performance: strategy, organization, and management in world auto industry, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA., 1991
  3. Clark, D. W.; 'Bugs are good: a problem-oriented approach to the management of design engineering,' Research Technology Management, pp. 23-27, May-Jun. 1990
  4. Cooper, K. G.; 'Naval ship production: a claim settled and a framework built,' Interfaces, 10(6) : 20-36, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.10.6.20
  5. Cooper,K. G.; 'Benchmarks for the project manager,' Project Management Journal, 1993
  6. Cooper, K. G.; 'The rework cycle: why projects are mismanaged,' PMNETwork, 1993
  7. Cooper, K. G.; 'How it really works and reworks,' PMNETwork, 1993
  8. Cooper, K. G.; 'The $2,000 hour: how managers influence project performance through the rework cycle,' Project Management Journal, 15(1) 11-24, 1994
  9. Eppinger, S. D.; 'Model-based approaches to managing concurrent engineerin g,' Journal of Engineering Design, 2(4), 1991
  10. Ford,D. N.; The dynamics of project management, Ph.D. thesis, MIT, 1995
  11. Ha,A. Y. and Porteus,E. L.; 'Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability,' Management Science, 41(9) : 1431-1447, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.41.9.1431
  12. Krishnan,V., Eppinger, S. D., and Whitney, D. E.; 'Accelerating product development by the exchange of preliminary product design information,' J Mechanical Design, 117 : 491-497, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2826709
  13. Krishnan,V.; 'Managing the simultaneous execution of coupled phases in concurrent product development,' IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43(2), 1996
  14. Kusiak, A. and Wang, J.; 'Efficient organizing of design activities,' International Journal of Production Research, 31(4) : 753-769, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207549308956755
  15. Paul,M.; 'Moving from blame to accountability,' The System Thinker, 8(1), 1997
  16. Robers,E. B.; The dynamics of research and development,New York : Harper & Row,1964
  17. Robers, E. B.; 'A simple model of R&D project dynamics, R&D Management, 5(1), 1974
  18. Richardson, G. P. and Pugh, A. L.; Introduction to system dynamics modeling with Dynamo,MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1981
  19. Rodrigues A. and Bowers, J.; 'System dynamics in project management: a comparative analysis with traditional methods,' System Dynamics Review, 12(2) : 121-139, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199622)12:2<121::AID-SDR99>3.0.CO;2-X
  20. Steward,D. V.; 'The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems,' IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 28(3) : 71-74, 1981
  21. Smith, P. R. and Eppinger, S. D.; 'Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration,' Management Science, 43(3) : 276-293, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.3.276
  22. Smith,P. R. and Eppinger,S. D.,'A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design,' Managemenl Science,43(8) : 1104-1120,1997 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.8.1104