Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investment Ranking Decision Using MCDA in Dam Projects

MCDA 기법을 이용한 댐사업의 투자우선순위 결정

  • 김우구 (한국수자원공사 기획조정실) ;
  • 이광만 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원) ;
  • 박두호 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원)
  • Published : 2006.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In empirical evaluations of public projects and public provided goods, MCDA(multicriteria decision-making analysis) has helped decision makers with an adequate policy decision-making tool since it allows taking into account a wide range of assessment criteria. As a tool for decision-making of conflict management, MCDA has demonstrated its usefulness in many public projects such as road, dam and harbor construction. In this study, to use this merit of MCDA, dam project assessment indicators from points of social, economic, environmental and practical views are developed based on sustainable development of water resources, and weighting factors are also estimated by means of questionnaire survey. In order to decide project investment rank, developed evaluation indicators are applied to 6 existing dams under investigation for a rehabilitation project. In addition to, it is recognized that the project practicability has become more important indicator as well as environmental and social issues. This is because cooperation and support from a local government and people are regarded as one of the most important problems in public projects recently.

공공사업이나 공공의 목적으로 제공되는 재화의 경험적 평가에 있어 다기준의사결정기법은 광범위한 평가기준을 고려할 수 있기 때문에 의사결정권자에게 적절한 의사결정 도구를 제공하였다. 대립관계문제의 의사결정 방법으로 다기준의사결정기법은 도로, 댐 및 항만건설 등 공공사업 분야에서 이의 유용성을 입증하였다. 본 연구에서는 다기준의사결정기법의 장점을 활용하기 위하여 사회, 경제, 환경 및 사업실현성 측면에서 댐 사업 평가지표를 수자원의 지속가능성에 바탕을 두고 개발하고, 설문조사를 통하여 지표의 중요도를 도출하였다. 사업투자우선순위결정을 위하여 개발된 평가지표를 실제 재개발을 위하여 조사중인 6개의 기존 댐에 적용하였다. 아울러 근래 공공사업의 추진과정에서 문제점으로 나타나고 있는 지자체 및 지역주민의 동의와 협조가 사업시행의 핵심인 점을 고려하여 사업실현성이 경제성, 환경성 및 사회성과 마찬가지로 중요한 요소임을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강민구, 이광만, 강신욱 (2004). '지속가능한 수자원 개발과 관리를 위한 수자원 평가 기법 연구', 한국수자원공사
  2. 건설교통부/한국수자원공사 (2001). 댐 건설지역 경제 활성화 및 투자우선순위 결정방안 연구
  3. 고석구, 이광만, 고익환 (1992). '다기준 의사결정기법에 의한 다목적 저수지의 운영율 평가', 한국수문학회, 제25권, pp. 75-82
  4. 곽승준, 유승훈, 허재용, Clifford Rl. (2003). '퍼지다기준 의사결정기법을 이용한 댐 건설영향에 대한 지역주민들의 의견평가.' 국토연구, 제38권, pp. 107-121
  5. 국토개발연구원 (2002). SOC 투자지표개발에 관한 연구-AHP 기법을 통한 투자지표설정방향을 중심으로
  6. 박태선 (2002). '계층화 분석법을 이용한 하천의 중요도 평가 기법', 한국수자원학회, 제35권, 제6호, pp. 685-692
  7. 서현교 (1998). 환경압력지수개발 및 그 적용에 관한 연구-서울과 전국의 비교를 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 서울대학교
  8. 이상신, 이상일 (2004). '지표수-지하수 연계운영을 위한 적지 분석시스템 개발', 한국수자원학회 학술발표회
  9. 이상일, 김병찬 (2003). '계층분석 과정을 이용한 지하 댐 적지 분석,' 한국지하수 토양환경학회, 제8권, 제4호, pp. 36-44
  10. 이현재, 심명필 (2002). '계층분석과정에 의한 가뭄시 용수배분 우선순위 의사결정', 한국수자원학회, 제35권, 제6호, pp. 703-714
  11. 한국건설기술연구원 (2004). 유역통합 물수지 분석 및 수자원 계획기술의 개발
  12. 한국수자원공사 (2002). 댐 건설이 사회.경제.문화에 미치는 영향 및 대책연구
  13. 한국수자원공사 (2003). 댐의 편익산정 개선방안 연구
  14. 國土交通省 河川局 (2003). 2003年度國士交通省河川局 河川事業評価昭硏究會
  15. 國土交通省河川局 (1999). 1999年度國土交通省河川局 關係事業評價
  16. 宮城縣士木部砂防水資源課 (2002). 2002年度事業個所評價に係る評價書
  17. Abigranem, G., L. Duckstein, and L. Hekman (1978). 'Multi objective analysis of vegetation management problems using ELECFRE II', Working Paper 78-19, Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson
  18. Benayoun, R., B. Roy, and B. Sussman (1966). 'ELECTRE: Une Methode Pour Guider le Choix en Presence de Points de Vue Multiples', SEMA (Metra International), Direction Scientifique, Note de Travail, No. 49. Paris, France
  19. Brans, J.P., P. Vincke, and B. Mareschal (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method
  20. Bruen, M. (2002). 'Multiple criteria and decision support systems in water resources planning and river basin management', National Hydrology Seminar
  21. Burrell, G., and G. Morgan (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Heinemann, London
  22. Cai, X. M., Lasdon, L., and A.M. Michelsen (2004). 'Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis', Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 130, No. 1. pp. 4-14 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:1(4)
  23. Charnes A, and W.W. Cooper (1961). Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming New York: Wiley
  24. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
  25. David, L., and L, Duckstein (1976). 'Multi-criterion ranking of Alternative Long-range Water Resources Systems', Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 12. pp. 731-754
  26. Duckstein, L., and S. Opricovic (1980). 'Multiobjective Optimization in River Basin Development', Water Resources Research, Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 14-20 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i001p00014
  27. Eder, G., Duckstein, L., and H.P. Nachtnebel (1997). 'Ranking Water Resource Projects and Evaluating Criteria by Multicriterion Q-Analysis: An Austrian Case Study', Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 6. pp. 259-271 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199709)6:5<259::AID-MCDA158>3.0.CO;2-7
  28. French, S. (1984). 'Interactive Multi-objective Programming: Its Aims, Applications and Demands', Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 35, No.9. pp. 827-834 https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.1984.165
  29. Ganoulis, J. (2003). 'Evaluating alternative strategies for wastewater recycling and reuse in the Mediterranean area', Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, Vol. 3, No.4. pp. 11-19
  30. Gershon, M., L. Duckstein, and R. McAniff (1982). 'Multi-objective river basin planning with qualitative criteria.' Water Resources Research, Vol. 18, No.2. pp. 193-202 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i002p00193
  31. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., and Duckstein, L. (1982). 'Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Application,' John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY., pp. 519
  32. Gregory, R., and R.L. Keeney (1994). 'Creating policy alternatives using stakeholder values', Management Science, Vol. 40, No.8. pp. 1035-1048 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.8.1035
  33. Harsanyi, J. C. (1977). 'Rational Behaviour and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations', Cambridge University Press, London
  34. Hostmann, M., H- J. Mosler, P. Reichert, and M. Borsuk (2004). 'Stakeholder values in decision support for river rehabilitation', Submitted to the Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis (JMCDA), September 15. 2004
  35. Howard, R. (1992). Value Focused Thinking, Harvard University Press
  36. Hyde, K.M., H.R. Maier, and C.B. Dolby (2004). 'Reliability-Based Approach to Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Water Resources', Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 130, No.6. pp. 429-438 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(429)
  37. Joubert, A., T.J. Stewart, and R. Eberhard (2004). 'Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the city of Cape town', Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 12. No. 1. pp. 17-25 https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.342
  38. Kangas J., and A. Kangas (2005). 'Multiple criteria decision support in forest management-the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained', Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 207. pp. 133-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.023
  39. Keeney, D.S. (1999). 'Historical and sociopolitical context of the western watershed movement', J. Am Wat. Re. Ass., Vol. 35, No.3. pp. 493-503 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb03606.x
  40. Keeney, R.L., and H. Raiffa (1976). Decisions with Multiple objective, preferences and Value Trade Offs: Wiley
  41. Marttunen, M., and M. Suomalainen (2004). Participatory and multiobjective development of water regulation-creation of regulation alternatives from stake -holders' preferences. Manuscript 1. 10
  42. Marttunen, M., and R.P. Hamalainen (1995). 'Decision analysis interviews in environmental impact assessment', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 87, No.3. pp. 551-563 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00229-4
  43. Nash, J. (1953). 'Two Person Cooperative Games', Econometrica, Vol. 21, No.1, pp. 128-140 https://doi.org/10.2307/1906951
  44. Raj, P.A. (1995). 'Multicriteria methods in river basin planning - a case study', Water Science and Technology, Vol. 31, No.8. pp, 261-272
  45. Raj, P.A., and D.N. Kumar (1996). Ranking multicriteria river basin planning and development alternatives using ELECTRE and RANFUW, West Aengal, India: Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology
  46. Roy, B. (1971). Problems and methods with multiple objective Fuctions, Math. Prog., Vol. 1, No.2. pp, 239-266 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01584088
  47. Roy, B., and B. Bertier, (1971). 'La Methode ELECTRE II: Une Methode de Classment en Presence de Criteres Multiples', Direction Scientifique, Groupe Metra, Note de Travail, No. 142. Paris, France
  48. Saaty, T. L., (1977). 'A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures', Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No.3, pp. 234-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  49. Simonovic, S.P. (1989). 'Application of water resources systems concept to the formulation of a water master plan.' water international, Vol. 14. pp. 37-50 https://doi.org/10.1080/02508068908692032
  50. Steuer, R. and Na, P. (2003). 'Multiple criteria decision making combines with Finance: A categorized bibliographic study', European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 150. No.3. pp
  51. Stewart, T. J. (1992). Three basic conceptions underlying multiple criteria interactive procedures, MCDM at the interface of Government and Society, in A. Goicochea, L. Duckstein and S. zionts (eds.), Proceedings, Fairfax. 1990, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Spring-Verlag, New York, pp 441-448
  52. Zeleny, M. (1982). Multiple criteria decision making, New York: McGraw-Hill
  53. Zopounidis, C., and M. Doumpos (2002). 'Multicriteria Classification and Sorting Methods: A Literature Review', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 138, No.2. pp. 229-246 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00243-0

Cited by

  1. Application of Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making Techniques for Robust Prioritization vol.33, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.917