The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Identification of bacteria from the peri-implant sulcus of orthodontic mini-implants using 16S rDNA clone library

16S rDNA 클론 library 제작 및 핵산염기서열 결정을 통한 교정용 미니임플랜트 주위 열구의 세균 동정

  • Lim, Sung-Hoon (Department of Orthodoniics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Kwang-Won (Department of Orthodoniics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Yoo, So-Young (Department of Oral Chemistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kook, Joong-Ki (Department of Oral Chemistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Chang, Young-Il (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 임성훈 (조선대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 김광원 (조선대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 유소영 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강생화학교실) ;
  • 국중기 (조선대학교 치과대학 구강생화학교실) ;
  • 장영일 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2006.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the bacterial flora at the peri-implant sulcus of the orthodontic mini-implant placed in the alveolar mucosa with the bacterial flora at the adjacent healthy gingival sulcus. Methods: Two plaque samples from 7 patients were collected by inserting paper points into the sulcus between the mini-implant and ligature wire connected to the mini-implant head and inflamed alveolar mucosa, and from the gingival sulcus of a healthy tooth adjacent to the mini-implant. Results: Using 16S rDNA clone library, the 24 kinds of bacteria including Haemophilus aphrophilus, Sphingomonas species, Capnocytophaga species, Prevotella melaninogenica, Lachnospiraceae species, Porphyromonas species, Neisseria flava were identified only from the sulcus around the mini-implant. These bacteria constituted only 9.2% of total clones, and the bacteria identified from both the sulcus around mini-implants and the gingival sulcus constituted 80.4% of total clones. Of these bacteria, clones of Prevotella species, Atopobium rimae, Veillonella species, Streptococcus intermedius/constellatus, Streptococcus salivarius were more frequently isolated from the peri-implant sulcus. Conclusion: This study suggests that a broad epidemiological study is needed to find causative bacteria which induce inflammation from the peri-implant sulcus.

교정치료 시 고정원으로 사용되는 교정용 미니임플랜트는 가동성 점막인 치조점막 부위에 식립해야 하는 경우가 많은데, 이때 미니임플랜트 주위 연조직의 증식을 동반한 염증이 빈번히 발생한다. 본 연구에서는 치조점막에 식립하여 연조직 증식이 발생된 미니임플랜트 주위의 세균총과 동일 환자의 인접한 건강한 치은 열구의 세균총을 비교하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 7명의 환자를 대상으로 하악 구치부의 치조점막에 식립하여 연조직 증식이 발생한 미니임플랜트 및 이에 연결된 결찰선 주위 열구의 세균막과 미니임플랜트에 인접한, 치은 염증이 없는 제2대구치의 치은열구의 세균막을 멸균된 paper point로 채취한 후, 16S rDNA 클론 library 제작 및 핵산염기서열 분석법을 이용하여 세균을 동정하여 비교하였다. 실험 결과 미니임플랜트 주위 열구로부터 304개의 16S rDNA 클론을 얻었으며, 치은열구로부터 238개의 16S rDNA 클론을 얻었다. 클론의 9.2%에 해당하는 24종의 세균들은 미니임플랜트 주위 열구에서만 검출되었고, 이들은 Haemophilus aphrophilus, Sphingomonas species, Capnocytophaga species, Prevotella melaninogenica, Lachnospiraceae species, Porphyromonas species, Neisseria flava 등이었다. 전체 클론의 80.4%에 해당하는 29종의 세균들은 미니임플랜트 주위 열구 및 건강한 치은 열구 모두에서 검출되었다. 이들 중 특히 미니임플랜트 주위에서 더 많은 클론이 분리된 세균들은 Prevotella species, Atopobium rimae, Veillonella species, Streptococcus intermedius/constellatus, Streptococcus salivarius 등이었다. 향후 연구에서는 본 연구에서 치조점막에 식립한 미니임플랜트 주위에서 검출된 세균들이 염증을 일으키거나 악화시킬 수 있는지를 밝히는 것이 필요하며, 이를 바탕으로 치조점막에 식립한 미니임플랜트 주위의 연조직 염증을 줄일 수 있는 방법을 찾는 것이 바람직하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lavelle CL. Mucosal seal around endosseous dental implants. J Oral Implant 1981;9:357-71
  2. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:15-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0503(81)80007-0
  3. Listgarten MA, Lang NP, Schroeder HE, Schroeder A. Periodontal tissue and their counterparts around endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:1-19 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020309.x
  4. Yoon BS, Choi BH, Lee WY, Kim KN, Shim HB, Park JH. A study on titanium miniscrew as orthodontic anchorage; an experimental investigation in dogs. Korea J Orthod 2001;31:517-23
  5. Kyung SH, Lim JK, Park YC. The use of miniscrew as an anchorage for the orthodontic tooth movement. Korean J Orthod 2001;31:415-24
  6. Melsen B. Mini-Implants: Where are we- J Clin Orthod 2005;39:539-47
  7. Mah J, Bergstrand F. Temporary anchorage devices: A status report. J Clin Orthod 2005;39:132-6
  8. Kyung SH, Choi JH, Park YC. Miniscrew anchorage used to protract lower second molars into first molar extraction sites. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:575-9
  9. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region f or orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-1
  10. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, K ok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used f or orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-6
  11. Wennstrom JL. Lack of association between width of attached gingiva and development of soft tissue recession. A 5-year longitudinal study. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:181-4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00964.x
  12. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four year report. J Periodontol 1982;53: 349-52 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1982.53.6.349
  13. Kennedy JE, Bird WC, Palcanis KG, Dorfman HS. A longitudinal evaluation of varying widths of attached gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1985;12:667-75 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1985.tb00938.x
  14. Karring T, Ostergaard E, Loe H. Conservation of tissue specificity after heterotopic transplantation of gingiva and alveolar mucosa. J Periodontal Res 1971;6:282-93 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1971.tb00619.x
  15. Strub JR, Gaberthuel TW, Grunder U. The role of attached gingiva in the health of peri-implant tissue in dogs. I. Clinical findings. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991;11:317-33
  16. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implant in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  17. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington DP, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
  18. Warrer K, Buser D, Lang NP, Karring T. Plaque-induced peri- implantitis in the presence or absence of keratinized mucosa. An experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:131-8 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060301.x
  19. Kawamura Y, H ou XG, Sultana F, Miura H, Ezaki T. Determination of 16S rRNA sequences of Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus gordonii and phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Streptococcus. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995;45:406-8. Erratum in: Int J Syst Bacteriol 1995;45:882 https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-45-2-406
  20. van Winkelhoff AJ, Goene RJ, Benschop C, Folmer T. Early colonization of dental implants by putative periodontal pathogens in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implnats Res 2000;11:511-20 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011006511.x
  21. Mombelli A, Marxer M, Gaberthuel T, Grunder U, Lang NP. The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:124-30 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb00123.x