Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Motor Evoked Potential Parameters in Intramedullary Myelopathy

수내 척수병증에서 자기운동유발전위 지표의 진단적 가치

  • Seo, Sang Hyeok (Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Yong Bum (Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Moon, Heui Soo (Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Chung, Pil Wook (Department of Neurology, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • An, Jae Young (Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Bae, Jong Seok (Department of Neurology, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Minky (Department of Neurology, Seoul Medical Center) ;
  • Shin, Kyong Jin (Department of Neurology, Hanmaeum General Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Byoung Joon (Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center)
  • 서상혁 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원, 신경과학교실) ;
  • 김용범 (강북삼성병원, 신경과학교실) ;
  • 문희수 (강북삼성병원, 신경과학교실) ;
  • 정필욱 (강북삼성병원, 신경과학교실) ;
  • 안재영 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원, 신경과학교실) ;
  • 배종석 (서울의료원 신경과) ;
  • 김민기 (서울의료원 신경과) ;
  • 신경진 (한마음병원 신경과) ;
  • 김병준 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원, 신경과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.06.30

Abstract

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive diagnostic method particularly suited to investigation the long motor tracts. The clinical value of TMS in most spinal cord diseases has still to be made. Diagnostic value of magnetic motor evoked potential (MEP) parameters in intramedullary spinal cord lesions was investigated. Methods: MEP elicited by TMS was recorded in 57 patients with clinically and radiologically defined intramedullary myelopathy. Twenty five patients with cervical myelopathy (CM) and 32 thoracic myelopathy (TM) were included. Recordings were performed during resting and minimal voluntary contraction at both abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles. Stimulation threshold(ST), amplitude, and central motor conduction time (CCT) were measured at resting and facilitated conditions. CCT was calculated by two means; central motor latency (CML)-M using magnetic transcranial and root stimulation, and CML-F using electrical F-wave study. The results were compared between patient groups and 10 normal control group. Results: Facilitated mean ST recorded at TA was elevated in both CM and TM compared with control group. Resting mean CML-M at TA was significantly prolonged in both CM and TM, and CML-M was absent or delayed in 37.1% of CM and 8% of TM at APB with facilitation. Facilitated mean MEP amplitude at ABP was lower in CM than in TM, while MEP/M ratios were not different significantly between groups. Conclusions: Magnetic motor evoked potential has diagnostic value in intramedullary myelopathy and localizing value in differentiating between CM and TM by recording at APB and TA. It is a noninvasive way to investigate the functional status of motor tracts of spinal cord.

Keywords