Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제19권10호
  • /
  • Pages.1369-1378
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Genetic Variability and Relationships of Japanese and Foreign Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Profiling

  • Osman, S.A.M. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Sekino, M. (Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute) ;
  • Nishihata, A. (Hyogo Station, National Livestock Breeding Center) ;
  • Kobayashi, Y. (Hyogo Station, National Livestock Breeding Center) ;
  • Takenaka, W. (Hyogo Station, National Livestock Breeding Center) ;
  • Kinoshita, K. (The United Graduate School of Agricultural Sciences, Kagoshima University) ;
  • Kuwayama, T. (Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Department of Animal Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture) ;
  • Nishibori, M. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Yamamoto, Y. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Tsudzuki, M. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University)
  • 투고 : 2005.11.29
  • 심사 : 2006.03.11
  • 발행 : 2006.10.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This is the first study in which genetic variability and relationships of a large number of Japanese chicken breeds were revealed along with those of several foreign breeds by using microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. Twenty-eight breeds (34 populations) of native Japanese chickens and seven foreign breeds or varieties were analyzed. The mean number of alleles per locus, the proportion of the polymorphic loci, and the expected average heterozygosity ranged from 1.75 to 4.70, from 0.55 to 1.00, and from 0.21 to 0.67, respectively. Microsatellite alleles being unique to a particular population were detected in some populations. The $D_A$ genetic distance between populations was obtained from allele frequency for every pair of the populations to construct a neighbor-joining tree. According to the phylogenetic tree, excluding a few exceptions, native Japanese chicken breeds and foreign breeds were clearly separated from each other. Furthermore, the tree topology divided native Japanese chickens into four main classes, which was almost in accordance with the classification based on body morphology; that is, (1) Cochin type, (2) Malay type, (3) layer type, and (4) intermediate type between Malay and layer types. This is the first finding for native Japanese chickens.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buchanan, F. C., L. J. Adams, R. P. Littlejohn, J. F. Maddox and A. M. Crawford. 1994. Determination of evolutionary relationships among sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genom. 22:397-403 https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1401
  2. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:233-257
  3. Cheng, H. H., I. Levin, R. L. Vallejo, H. Khatib, J. B. Dodgson, L. B. Crittenden and J. Hillel. 1995. Development of a genetic map of the chicken with markers of high utility. Poult. Sci. 74:1855-1874 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0741855
  4. Cheng, G. H., X. S. Wu, D. Q. Wang, J. Qin, S. L. Wu, Q. L. Zhou, F. Xie, R. Cheng, Q. Xu, B. Liu, X. Y. Zhang and O. Olowofeso. 2004. Cluster analysis of 12 Chinese native chicken populations using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1047-1052 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1047
  5. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. B. F. Groen, A. J. A. van Kampen, Van der S. Beek, J. J. van Der Poel and M. A. M. Groenen. 1996. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poult. Sci. 75:904-909 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750904
  6. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. J. A. van Kampen, J. J. van der Poel and M. A. M Groenen. 1993. Highly polymorphic microsatellite markers in poultry. Anim. Genet. 24:441-443 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1993.tb00360.x
  7. Dorji, T., O. Hanotte, M. Arbenz, J. E. O. Rege and W. Roder. 2003. Genetic diversity of indigenous cattle populations in Bhutan: Implications for conservation. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:946-951 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.946
  8. Emara, M. G., H. Kim, J. J. Zhu, R. R. Lapierre, N. Lakshmanan and H. S. Lillehoj. 2002. Genetic diversity at the major histocompatibility complex (B) and microsatellite loci in three commercial broiler pure lines. Poult. Sci. 81:1609-1617 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.11.1609
  9. Goldstein, D. B. and D. D. Pollock. 1997. Launching microsatellites: A review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Hered. 88:335-342 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023114
  10. Goldstein, D. B., L. A. Ruiz, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza and M. W. Feldman. 1995. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6723-6727
  11. Groenen, M. A. M., H. H. Cheng, N. Bumstead, B. F. Benkel, W. E. Briles, T. Burke, D. W. Burt, L. B. Crittenden, J. Dodgson, J. Hillel, S. Lamont, A. P. de Leon, M. Soller, H. Takahashi and A. Vignal. 2000. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 10:137-147
  12. Hashiguchi, T., M. Tsuneyoshi, T. Nishida, H. Higashiuwatoko and E. Hiraoka. 1981. Phylogenetic relationships determined by the blood protein types of fowls (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 52:713-729
  13. Hillel, J., M. A. Groenen, M. Tixier-Boichard, A. B. Korol, L. David, V. M. Kirzhner, T. Burke, A. Barre-Dirie, R. P. Crooijmans, K. Elo, M. W. Feldman, P. J. Freidlin, A. Maki- Tanila, M. Oortwijn, P. Thomson, A. Vignal, K. Wimmers and S. Weigend. 2003. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35:533-557 https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-35-6-533
  14. Japan Chicken Association. 2003. The guidebook of special meattype chickens (in Japanese). Zenkoku-Shokuchou-Shinbun Co. Ltd., Tokyo
  15. Kuroda, N. and T. Yamaguchi. 1987. Japanese Chickens as Natural Monuments (in Japanese). Kyoikusha, Tokyo
  16. Lewontin, R. C. and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genetic heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseduobscura. Genet. 54:595-609
  17. MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, D. G. Barley, P. M. Sharp and P. Cunningham. 1994. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among European cattle breeds. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Series B. 256:25-31
  18. Martinez, A. M., J. V. Delgado, A. Rodero and J. L. Vega-pla. 2000. Genetic structure of the Iberian pig breed using microsatellite. Anim. Genet. 31:295-301 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00645.x
  19. Milligan, B. G., J. Leebens-Mack and A. E. Strand. 1994. Conservation genetics: Beyond the maintenance of marker diversity. Mol. Ecol. 3:423-435 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00082.x
  20. Mitsui, T. 1979. General View of Japanese Native Chickens (in Japanese). Petlife-Sha, Tokyo
  21. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583- 590
  22. Nei, M., F. Tajima and Y. Tateno. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data: 2. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300753
  23. Nishida, T., Y. Hayashi, T. Fujioka, I. Tsugiyama and K. Mochizuki. 1985a. Osteometric studies on the phylogenetic relationships of Japanese native fowls. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 47:25- 37 https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms1939.47.25
  24. Nishida, T., Y. Hayashi and T. Hashiguchi. 1985b. Somatometrical studies on the morphological relationships of Japanese native fowls. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 56:645-657
  25. Oana, H. 1951. The Histories of Japanese Native Chickens (in Japanese). Nihonkei-Kenkyusha, Tokyo
  26. Okabayashi, H., S. Kamiya and Y. Tanabe. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among Japanese native chicken breeds based on blood protein polymorphism (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 35:173-181 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.35.173
  27. Okada, I. 1991. The native chicken of Japan. In Catalogue of the Native Poultry of Southeast Asia. (Ed. J. Bay-Petersen). Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Tainan, pp. 3-35
  28. Okada, I., K. Toyokawa and I. Takayasu. 1980. Genetic relationships of some native chicken breeds in the northern Tohoku district of Japan (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 17:337-343 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.17.337
  29. Okada, I., Y. Yamamoto, T. Hashiguchi and S. Ito. 1984. Phylogenetic studies on the Japanese native breeds of chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 21:318-329 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.21.318
  30. Okada, I., Y. Yamamoto, A. Shinjo, S. Kimura and H. Hiraoka. 1989. Studies of genetic differentiation within breeds of Japanese indigenous chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 26:207-215 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.26.207
  31. Osman, A.-M. S., M. Sekino, M. Nishibori, Y. Kawamoto, K. Kinoshita, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2004. Genetic variability and relationships of Japanese native chickens assessed by means of microsatellite profiling approach - Focusing on the Oh-Shamo (Japanese Large Game) and its related breeds. J. Poult. Sci. 41:94-109 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.41.94
  32. Osman, S. A. M., M. Sekino, M. Nishibori, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2005. Genetic variability and relationships of native Japanese chickens assessed by microsatellite DNA profiling- Focusing on the breeds established in Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:755-761 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2005.755
  33. Osman, S. A. M., M. Sekino, T. Kuwayama, K. Kinoshita, M. Nishibori, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2006. Genetic variability and relationships of native Japanese chickens based on microsatellite DNA polymorphisms -Focusing on the Natural Monuments of Japan. J. Poult. Sci. 43:12-22 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.12
  34. Ota, T. 2001. DISPAN: Genetic distance and phylogenetic analysis (last modified May 19, 2001) http://www.bio.psu.edu/people/ faculty/nei/lab/programs.html
  35. Page, R. D. M. 2001. TREEVIEW (last modified Sept 3, 2001) http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod
  36. Pandey, A. K., M. S. Tantia, D. Kumar, B. Misra, P. Choudhary and R. K. Vijh. 2002. Microsatellite analysis of three poultry breeds of India. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1536-1542 https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2002.1536
  37. Park, S. D. E. 2005. The Excel Microsatellite Toolkit (last modified May 5, 2005). http://oscar.gen.tcd.ie/~sdepark/mstoolkit/
  38. Paszek, A. A., G. H. Flickinger, L. Fontanesi, C. W. Beattie, G. A. Rohrer, A. L. Alexander and L. B. Schook. 1998. Evolutionary divergence with microsatellites. J. Mol. Evol. 46:121-126 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006279
  39. Petit, E., S. Aulagnier, D. Vaiman, C. Bouissou and B. Crouauroy. 1997. Microsatellite variation in a introduced mouflon population. J. Hered. 88:517-520 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023147
  40. Ponsuksili, S., K. Wimmers and P. Horst. 1996. Genetic variability in chickens using polymorphic microsatellite markers. Thai J. Agr. Sci. 29:571-580
  41. Roberts, V. 1997. British Pultry Standards. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford
  42. Saitou, N. and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425
  43. Sawada, Y. 1978. My grandfather, I, and Miyadi-dori (in Japanese). Nippon-no-Aigankei 55:8-9
  44. Schmid, M., I. Nanda, M. Guttenbach, C. Steinlein, M. Hoehn, M. Schartl, T. Haaf, S. Weigend, R. Fries, J. M. Buerstedde, K. Wimmers, D. W. Burt, J. Smith, S. A'Hara, A. Law, D. K. Griffin, N. Bumstead, J. Kaufman, P. A. Thomson, T. Burke, M. A. Groenen, R. P. Crooijmans, A. Vignal, V. Fillon, M. Morisson, F. Pitel, M. Tixier-Boichard, K. Ladjali-Mohammedi, J. Hillel, A. Maki-Tanila, H. H. Cheng, M. E. Delany, J. Burnside and S. Mizuno. 2000. First report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2000. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 90:169-218 https://doi.org/10.1159/000056772
  45. Shriver, M. D., L. Jin, E. Boerwinkle, R. Deka and R. E. Ferrell. 1995. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:914-920
  46. Takezaki, N. and M. Nei. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genet. 144:389-399
  47. Tanabe, Y. and M. Mizutani. 1980. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds: 3. Genetic distances among the 16 breeds based on 16 loci, and their dendrogram (in Japanese with English sumarry). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 17:116-121 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.17.116
  48. Tanabe, Y., T. Iida, H. Yoshino, A. Shinjo and S. Muramatsu. 1991. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds: 5. The comparisons among native fowl breeds in Japan and its adjacent areas and European and American fowl breeds (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 28:266-277 https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.28.266
  49. Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:6463-6471 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/17.16.6463
  50. Tsudzuki, M. 2003. Japanese native chickens. In The Relationship between Indigenous Animals and Humans in APEC Region. (Ed. H. L. Chang and Y. C. Huang). The Chinese Society of Animal Science, Taiwan, Tainan. pp. 91-116
  51. Vanhala, T., M. Tuiskula-Haavisto, K. Elo, J. Vilkki and A. A. Mäki-Tanil. 1998. Evaluation of genetic variability and genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers. Poult. Sci. 77:783-790 https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.6.783
  52. van Marle-Koster, E. and L. H. Nel. 2000. Genetic characterization of native southern African chicken populations: Evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. South Afrc. J. Anim. Sci. 30:1-6

피인용 문헌

  1. High genetic divergence in miniature breeds of Japanese native chickens compared to Red Junglefowl, as revealed by microsatellite analysis vol.39, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01690.x
  2. Genetic structure and differentiation of the Japanese extremely long-tailed chicken breed (Onagadori), associated with plumage colour variation: suggestions for its management and conservation vol.40, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01955.x
  3. Characteristics of PCR fragments amplified using five microsatellite markers for identifying the Nagoya breed vol.81, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00754.x
  4. Mapping quantitative trait loci for egg production traits in an F2 intercross of Oh-Shamo and White Leghorn chickens vol.42, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2011.02190.x
  5. Analysis of Genetic Characteristics and Probability of Individual Discrimination in Korean Indigenous Chicken Brands by Microsatellite Marker vol.55, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2013.55.3.185
  6. Genetic Diversity and Relationships of Korean Chicken Breeds Based on 30 Microsatellite Markers vol.27, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14016
  7. Genetic Diversity and Structure of the Ryujin-Jidori, a Critically Endangered Native Japanese Chicken Breed, Based on Microsatellite DNA Analysis pp.1349-0486, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0130234
  8. Mapping of Main-Effect and Epistatic Quantitative Trait Loci for Internal Egg Traits in an F2 Resource Population of Chickens pp.1349-0486, 2014, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0140030
  9. Characteristics of Egg-related Traits in the Onagadori (Japanese Extremely Long Tail) Breed of Chickens vol.52, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0140109
  10. Genetic Differentiation among Populations of the Kurokashiwa Breed of Indigenous Japanese Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Polymorphisms vol.52, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0140063
  11. Genetic Mapping of Quantitative Trait Loci for Egg Production and Egg Quality Traits in Chickens: a Review vol.54, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0160121
  12. Genetic diversity of Saudi native chicken breeds segregating for naked neck and frizzle genes using microsatellite markers vol.31, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0041
  13. Quantitative trait loci mapping for the shear force value in breast muscle of F2 chickens vol.98, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey493
  14. Genetic Diversity and Differentiation of the Nagoya Breed Inferred from Microsatellite DNA Polymorphisms vol.44, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.44.135
  15. Assessing Genetic Diversity and Population Structure for Commercial Chicken Lines Based on Forty Microsatellite Analyses vol.86, pp.11, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00233
  16. Genetic Diversity of Wild Quail in China Ascertained with Microsatellite DNA Markers vol.20, pp.12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1783
  17. Production of Kids from In vitro Fertilized Goat Embryos and Their Parentage Assessment Using Microsatellite Markers vol.20, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.842
  18. Genetic Relationship in Chicken Breeds Using Molecular Co-ancestry Information vol.21, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.60610
  19. Population Structure and Biodiversity of Chinese Indigenous Duck Breeds Revealed by 15 Microsatellite Markers vol.21, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70100
  20. Study on Genetic Diversity of Six Duck Populations with Microsatellite DNA vol.21, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70367
  21. Genomic Heterogeneity of Chicken Populations in India vol.21, pp.12, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.80299
  22. The Genetic Diversity of Eight Chicken Populations Assessed by 102 Indels Markers vol.50, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0120088
  23. Characteristics of free amino acids and fatty acids composition in the marketing meat of Aizu Jidori vol.24, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2740/jisdh.24.177
  24. Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping for External Egg Traits in F2 Chickens vol.51, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0130100
  25. Characterization of Growth, Fat Deposition, and Lipid Metabolism-Related Gene Expression in Lean and Obese Meat-Type Chickens vol.56, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0180064
  26. Rapid behavioral assay using handling test provides breed and sex differences in tameness of chickens vol.9, pp.10, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1394
  27. Causal phenotypic networks for egg traits in an F2 chicken population vol.294, pp.6, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-019-01588-2
  28. Tonic Immobility and Open Field Responses in Nagoya, White Leghorn, and White Plymouth Rock Chicks vol.57, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0190085
  29. Geographic Origin and Genetic Characteristics of Japanese Indigenous Chickens Inferred from Mitochondrial D-Loop Region and Microsatellite DNA Markers vol.10, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112074
  30. QTL analysis for early growth in an intercross between native Japanese Nagoya and White Plymouth Rock chicken breeds using RAD sequencing‐based SNP markers vol.52, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1111/age.13039
  31. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of Tosa-Jidori sheds light on the origin and evolution of Japanese native chickens vol.34, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0932
  32. Mapping QTLs for Breast Muscle Weight in an F2 Intercross between Native Japanese Nagoya and White Plymouth Rock Chicken Breeds vol.11, pp.8, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3390/life11080754
  33. Genotype affects free amino acids of egg yolk and albumen in Japanese indigenous breeds and commercial Brown layer chickens vol.101, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101582