Comparison of Expression Pattern of Housekeeping Genes in Mice fed Genetically Modified Rice

유전자 이입에 따른 GM쌀 섭취 마우스의 Housekeeping Gene 발현 패턴 비교

  • Lee, Dong-Yeob (Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Heo, Jin-Chul (Food & Bio-industry Research Institute, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Hyun (Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Ho (Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • U, Sang-Uk (Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Suk (National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Han (Department of Food Science & Biotechnology, Kyungpook National University)
  • 이동엽 (경북대학교 생명식품공학부) ;
  • 허진철 (경북대학교 식품생물산업연구소) ;
  • 이규현 (경북대학교 생명식품공학부) ;
  • 김동호 (경북대학교 생명식품공학부) ;
  • 우상욱 (경북대학교 생명식품공학부) ;
  • 조현석 (농업생명공학연구원 생물안전성과) ;
  • 이상한 (경북대학교 생명식품공학부)
  • Published : 2007.12.31

Abstract

To evaluate the human risk of long-term intake of genetically modified (GM) rice, we carried out RT-PCR of housekeeping genes. Housekeeping genes, which show highly uniform expression in living organisms during various stages of development and under different environmental conditions, were normalized by RT-PCR. We assessed the expression of 10 common housekeeping genes (18s rRNA, 25S rRNA, UBC, UBQ5, UBQ10, ACT11, GAPDH, eEF-$1{\alpha}$, ${\beta}$-TUB, GAPDH, ${\beta}$-actin, B2m, G6pd2, Gyk, Gus, Hprt, Cyclophlin A, Tfrc, ${\alpha}$-tubulin and RPL13A) in the liver, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, kidney and spleen of mice fed GM or non-GM rice. We found no significant differences in the expression of housekeeping genes between the two groups of mice.

Keywords

References

  1. Jank, B., Rath, J. and Gaugitsch, H. (2006) Co-existence of agricultural production systems. Trends Biotechnol., 24, 198-200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.03.001
  2. Monastra, G. and Rossi, L. (2003) Transgenic foods as a tool for malnutrition elimination and their impact on agricultural systems. Riv. Biol., 96, 363-84
  3. Gujar, G.T., Kalia, V., Kumari, A., Singh, B.P., Mittal, A., Nair, R. and Mohan, M. (2007) Helicoverpa armigera baseline susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins and resistance management for Bt cotton in India. J. Invertebr. Pathol., 95, 214-219 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2007.03.011
  4. Deaville, E.R. and Maddison, B.C. (2005) Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA fragments in the blood, tissues, and digesta of broilers. J. Agr. Food Chem., 53, 10268-10275 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf051652f
  5. Margulis, C. (2006) The hazards of genetically engineered foods. Environ. Health Perspect., 114, A146-A147 https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.114-a146
  6. Kinney, A.J. (2006) Metabolic engineering in plants for human health and nutrition. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 17, 130-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.006
  7. Paparini, A. and Romano-Spica, V. (2004) Public health issues related with the consumption of food obtained from genetically modified organisms. Biotechnol. Ann. 10, 85-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-2656(04)10004-5
  8. Moseley, B.E. (2002) Safety assessment and public concern for genetically modified food products: the European view. Toxicol. Pathol., 30, 129-131 https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230252824824
  9. Budatha, M., Meur, G. and Dutta-Gupta, A. (2007) A novel aminopeptidase in the fat body of the moth Achaea janata as a receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins and its comparison with midgut aminopeptidase. Biochem. J., 405, 287-297 https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20070054
  10. Filby, A.L. and Tyler, C.R. (2007) Appropriate 'housekeeping' genes for use in expression profiling the effects of environmental estrogens in fish. BMC Mol Biol., 8, 8-10 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2199-8-8
  11. Jain, M., Nijhawan, A., Tyagi, A.K. and Khurana, J.P. (2006) Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 345, 646-551 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.04.140
  12. Rodriguez-Mulero, S. and Montanya, E. (2005) Selection of a suitable internal control gene for expression studies in pancreatic islet grafts. Transplantation, 80, 650-552 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.tp.0000173790.12227.7b
  13. Mazza, R., Soave, M., Morlacchini, M., Piva, G. and Marocco, A. (2005) Assessing the transfer of genetically modified DNA from feed to animal tissues. Transgenic Res., 14, 775-784 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-005-0009-5
  14. Guerrero, G.G., Russell, W.M. and Moreno-Fierros, L. (2007) Analysis of the cellular immune response induced by Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1A toxins in mice: effect of the hydrophobic motif from diphtheria toxin. Mol. Immunol., 44, 1209-1217 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2006.06.007
  15. Reis, L.F., Van Sluys, M.A., Garratt, R.C., Pereira, H.M. and Teixeira, M.M. (2006) GMOs: building the future on the basis of past experience. Ann. Acad. Bras. Cienc., 78, 667-686 https://doi.org/10.1590/S0001-37652006000400005