DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Compressive Strength Development of Briquette Ash by Alkali Activated Reaction

알칼리 활성반응에 의한 Briquette ash의 강도 발현 특성

  • Published : 2008.09.27

Abstract

Non-sintering cement was manufactured with briquette ash. Alkali activator for compression bodies used a NaOH solution. In order to apply alkali-activated briquette ash and the non-sintering cement to concrete, several experimental studies were performed. It was necessary to study the binder obtained by means of a substitute for the cement. This study concentrated on strength development according to the concentration of NaOH solution, the curing temperature, and the curing time. The highest compressive strength of compression bodies appeared as $353kgf/cm^2$ cured at $80^{\circ}C$ for 28 days. This result indicates that a higher curing temperature is needed to get a higher strength body. Also, geopolymerization was examined by SEM and XRD analysis after the curing of compression bodies. According to SEM and XRD, the main reaction product in the alkali activated briquette ash is aluminosilicate crystal.

Keywords

References

  1. Z. P. Guo, Z.W.Zhao, H. K. Liu and S.X.Dou, Carbon, 43, 1392 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.008
  2. W. Jiang and D. M. Roy, Ceram. Bull., 71, 642 (1985)
  3. P. K. Mehta and O. E. Gjory, Cem. Concr. Res., 12, 587 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(82)90019-9
  4. Y. S. Kim, J. H. Rim, B. H. Kim and B. S. Shin, J. Miner. Eng., 34, 227 (1997)
  5. F. Puertas, S. Martinez-Ramirez, S. Alonse and T. Vazquez, Cem. Concr. Res., 30, 1625 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2
  6. A. Palomo, M. W. Grutzeck and M. T. Blanco, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1323 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9
  7. B. V. Rangan, D. Hardjito, S. E. Wallah and D. M. J. Sumajouw, J. Mater. Sci., 42, 3124, (2007) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0523-8
  8. F. Jirasit, L. Lohaus, In Proceedings of the World Congress Geopolymer (Saint Quentin, France, June 2005). p107-111
  9. J. Davidovits, 15th ed., Melbourne, Australia, (2002)
  10. J. Davidovits, In Proceedings of the world Congress Geopolymer (Saint Quentin, France, June 2005). p9-15
  11. A. F. Ross, J. D. Kenneth, MacKenzie, L. Catherine, Nicholson and S. Shimada, J. Europ. Ceram. Soc., 25, 1471 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.06.001
  12. J. G. S.van jaarsveld, J. S. J. van Deventer and L. Lorenzen, Miner. Eng. 10, 659 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00046-0
  13. J. Davidovits, J. Therm. Anal., 37, 1633 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193
  14. P. Duxson, J. L. Provis, G. C. Lukey, S. J. Jannie and V. Deventer, Cem. Concr. Res., 37, 1590 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018