Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회논문집)

Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea (한국전산구조공학회)
권호 표지

Regularization Method by Subset Selection for Structural Damage Detection

구조손상 탐색을 위한 부 집합 선택에 의한 정규화 방법

  • 윤군진 (Washington University 기계항공구조공학과) ;
  • 한봉구 (서울산업대학교 건설공학부)
  • Published : 2008.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a new regularization method by parameter subset selection method is proposed based on the residual force vector for damage localization. Although subset selection using the fundamental modal characteristics as a residual function has been successful in detecting a single damage location, this method seems to have limited capabilities in the detection of multiple damage locations and typically requires cumbersome weighting values. The method is presented herein and considers cases in which damage detection must be achieved using incomplete measurements of the structural responses. Model expansion is incorporated to deal with this challenge. The unique advantage of employing the new regularization method is that it can reliably identify multiple damage locations. Through an illustrative example, the proposed damage detection method is demonstrated to be a reliable tool for identifying multiple damage locations for a planar truss structure.

본 논문에서는 구조손상 탐색을 위해 매개변수 부 집합 선택에 의한 새로운 정규화 방법을 제안하였다. Residual function을 위해 동적 residual force 벡터를 이용하였다. 과거에는 Residual function으로서 기본 동적 특성치(고유치와 고유모드)를 이용하여 단일구조손상은 탐색할 수 있었지만 다중구조손상 위치를 탐색하기에는 한계가 있었을 뿐 아니라 고유모드와 고유치의 상이한 기여도 때문에 가중치를 적용해야 하는 어려움이 있었다. 본 논문에서 제안된 방법은 고유모드의 불완전한 계측을 보완하기 위하여 모델 확장법을 적용하였다. 제안된 구조손상 탐색법은 다중구조손상 위치를 동시에 찾아 낼 수 있는 장점을 가지고 있다. 2차원 평면 트러스 구조를 이용하여 제안된 방법의 효용성을 검증하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baruch, M., Bar-Itzhack, I.Y. (1978) Optimum Weighted Orthogonalization of Measured Modes, AIAA Journal, 16, pp.346-351 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60896
  2. Berman, A., Nagy, E.J. (1983) Improvements of a Large Analytical Model Using Test Data, AIAA Journal, 21, pp.1168-1173 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60140
  3. Doebling, S.W. (1996) Minimum-rank optimal update of elemental stiffness parameters for structural damage identification, AIAA Journal, 34, pp.2615-2621 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.13447
  4. Doebling, S.W., Farrar, C.R., Prime, M.B. (1998) A Summary Review of Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods, The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30, pp.91-105 https://doi.org/10.1177/058310249803000201
  5. Efroymson, M.A. (1960) Multiple Regression Analysis, in Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers. John Wiley: New York
  6. Fox, R.L., Kapoop, M.P. (1968) Rates of Change of Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors, AIAA Journal, 6, pp.2426-2429 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.5008
  7. Fregolent, A., D'Amcrogio, W., Salvini, P., Sestieri, A. (1996) Regularization Techniques for Dynamic Model Updating Using Input Residuals, Inverse Problems in Engineering, 2, pp.171-200 https://doi.org/10.1080/174159796088027601
  8. Friswell, M.I., Penny, J.E.T. (1997) Is Damage Location using Vibration Measurement Practical? EUROMECH 365 International Workshop: DAMAS 97, Structural Assessment using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures Sheffield, UK
  9. Friswell, M.I., Penny, J.E.T., Garvey, S.D. (1997) Parameter Subset Selection in Damage Location, Inverse Problems in Engineering, 5, pp.189-215 https://doi.org/10.1080/174159797088027660
  10. Kaouk, M., Zimmerman, D.C. (1994) Structural Damage Assessment Using a Generalized Minimum Rank Perturbation-Theory. AIAA Journal, 32, pp. 836-842 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12061
  11. Koh, B.H., Dyke, S.J. (2007) Structural health monitoring for flexible bridge structures using correlation and sensitivity of modal data, Computers & Structures, 85, pp.117-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.09.005
  12. Lallement, G., Piranda, J. (1990) Localization Methods for Parameter Updating of Finite Element Models in Elastodynamics. 8th International Modal Analysis Conference Orlando, Florida, pp.579-585
  13. Messina, A., Jones, I.A., Williams, E.J. (1996) Damage Detection and Localisation Using Natural Frequency Changes, Proceedings Conference Identification in Engineering Systems Swansea, UK pp.67-76
  14. Messina, A., Williams, E.J., Contursi, T. (1998) Structural damage detection by a sensitivity and statistical-based method, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 216, pp.791-808 https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1998.1728
  15. Miller, A.J. (1996) The convergence of Efroymson's stepwise regression algorithm. American Statistician, 50, pp.180-181 https://doi.org/10.2307/2684436
  16. Rothwell, E., Drachman, B. (1989) A Unified Approach to Solving Ill-Conditioned Matrix Problems, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 28, pp.609-620 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620280309
  17. Song, W., Dyke, S.J., Yun, G.J., Harmon, T.G. (2007) Trust-region Optimization Based Model Updating with Subset Selection and Damage Functions for SHM. World Forum on Smart Materials and Smart Structures Technology(SMSST'07) Chongqing & Nanjing, China, May, 22-27
  18. Teughels, A., De Roeck, G. (2003) Damage assessment of the Z24 bridge by FE model updating, in Damage Assessment of Structures, Proceedings, pp.19-26
  19. Titurus, B., Friswell, M.I., Starek, L. (2003) Damage detection using generic elements: Part II. Damage detection, Computers & Structures, 81, pp.2287-2299 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00318-3
  20. Yun, G.J., Ogorzalek, K.A., Dyke, S.J. (2007) Structural Damage Detection using Genetic Algorithms: an Empirical Study of Genetic Operators, Engineering Optimization Submitted in 2007