A NOVEL METHOD FOR REFINING A META-MODEL BY PARETO FRONTIER

파레토 프론티어를 이용한 메타모델 정예화 기법 개발

  • 조성종 (부산대학교 대학원 항공우주공학과) ;
  • 채상현 (부산대학교 대학원 항공우주공학과) ;
  • 이관중 (부산대학교)
  • Published : 2009.12.31

Abstract

Although optimization by sequentially refining metamodels is known to be computationally very efficient, the metamodel that can be used for this purpose is limited to Kriging method due to the difficulties related with sample points selections. The present study suggests a novel method for sequentially refining metamodels using Pareto Frontiers, which can be used independent of the type of metamodels. It is shown from the examples that the present method yields more accurate metamodels compared with full-factorial optimization and also guarantees global optimum irrespective of the initial conditions. Finally, in order to prove the generality of the present method, it is applied to a 2D transonic airfoil optimization problem, and the successful design results are obtained.

Keywords

References

  1. 1989, Sack, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J. and Wynn, H.P., "Design and analysis of computer experiments(with discussion)," Statistical Science 4, pp.409-435 https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  2. 1963, Matheron, G., Principles of geostatistics, Economic Geology, Vol.58, pp.1246-1266 https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246
  3. 1998, Matthias, S., William, J.W. and Donald, R.J., "Global versus local search in constrained optimization of computer models," New Developments and Applications in Experimental Design, edited by N.Flournoy, W.F. Rosenberger, and W.K. Wong, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, California, Vol.34, pp.11-25 https://doi.org/10.1214/lnms/121545618210.1214/lnms/121545618210.1214/lnms/1215456182
  4. 2004, Jeong, S.K., Yamamoto, K. and Obayashi, S., "Kriging-based probabilistic method for constrained multi-objective optimization problem," AIAA 1st Intelligent Systems Technical Conference, AIAA-2004-6437
  5. 2001, Simpson, T.W., Poplinski, J.D., Koch, P.N. and Allen, J.K., "Metamodels for computer-based engineering design: Survey and recommendations," Engineering with Computers, Springer London, Vol.17(2), pp.129-150 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007198
  6. 2004, Jin, R., Chen, W. and Sudijianto., A., "Analytical metamodel-based global sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation for rubust design," paper 2004-01-0429. In SAE Transactions, SAE Congress, March 8-11, Detroit, USA
  7. 2003, Paul, K.D. and James, H.B., Motivated metamodels: synthesis of cause-effect reasoning and statistical metamodeling, Rand Corporation, USA
  8. 2007, Gorissen, D., "Heterogeneous evolution of surrogate models," Thesis submitted for master degree of Katholeieke Universiteit Leuven, Netherlands
  9. 2005, Queipo, N.V., Haftka, R.T., Shyy, W., Goel, T., Vaidyanathan, R. and Tucker, P.K., "Surrogate-based analysis and optimization," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol.41, pp.1-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.02.001
  10. 2008, Collins, K., Bain, J., Rajmohan, N., Sankar, L., Egolf, T. and Janakiram, R.D., "Toward a high-fidelity helicopter rotor redesign framework," AHS International 64th Annual Forum & Technology Display, Motreal, Canada
  11. 1994, Fausett, L., Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, algorithms and applications, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA
  12. 1979, McKay, M.D., Beckman, R.J. and Conover, W.J., "A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code," technometric, Vol.21, No.2, pp.239-245 https://doi.org/10.2307/1268522
  13. 2004, Arora, J.S., Introduction to optimum design, second edition, Elsevier academic press, pp.546-551
  14. 1989, Goldberg, D.E., Genetic algorithms in search, optimization & machine learnin, Addison-Wesley publishing, Inc., reading, Jan
  15. 1999, Sobieczky, H., "Parametric airfoils and wings," Recent development of aerodynamic design methodologies -Inverse Design and Otimization, pp.71-87