DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the Effect of Plant Growth for Ecological Sound Barrier Development

생태방음벽 개발을 위한 식물생장의 효과에 관한 연구

  • Bashyal, Sarita (Department of Environmental Engineering, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Cho, Hae-Yong (Department of Environmental Engineering, Sunmoon University) ;
  • Choi, Chang-Ha (Department of Hybrid Engineering, Sunmoon University)
  • 사리타 버셀 (선문대학교 공과대학 환경공학과) ;
  • 조해용 (선문대학교 공과대학 환경공학과) ;
  • 최창하 (선문대학교 공과대학 하이브리드공학과)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

Abstract

For the development of ecological sound proof wall, successful seed germination and growth of plants are very important. In our present study, we observed germination of thirty five different seed species in growth chamber at $24^{\circ}C$, humidity 60% and alternation of 12 hours photoperiods. Germination of same seeds were carried out at room temperature on 6:4, 7:3, 8:2, and 9:1 proportion of pure and mineral soils respectively. Out of studied species, maximum germination was recorded for Perennial penant (92%), followed by Brassica napus (86%), and Silene armeria (82%). The measurement of root/shoot length showed, maximum root/shoot length for Perennial penant, followed by perennial sonata and Rebolsentri sp. Based on germination percentage and root/shoot length of germinating seeds, we considered Perennial penant, perennial sonata and Rebolsentri sp. were proper species for the construction of ecological sound proof walls

생태방음벽에 있어서 구조도 중요하지만, 식물종자의 발아와 생장율을 고려한 선택도 매우 중요하다. 재래종과 외래종 35종을 선발하여 온도 $24^{\circ}C$, 습도 60%, 그리고 12시간 주기로 낮과 밤을 조절하였고, 식생기반재로 일반토양과 유기물 토양의 비율을 6:4, 7:3, 8:2, 9:1로 하여 실험하였다. 실험한 종 중 8종은 2주 동안 발아하지 않았지만 그 외 나머지 종들은 시간차를 두고 모두 발아하였다. 가장 발아율이 좋은 종은 Perennial penant(92 %)이고 다음은 Brassica napus(86%), 그리고 Silene armeria(82 %) 순으로 나타났다. 본 연구에서는 발아한 종의 뿌리 및 줄기의 길이를 측정하여 분석하였다. 이번 연구에서 뿌리의 생장이 가장 좋은 3종 Perennial penant, Perennial sonata Rebolsentri가 생태방음벽 개발에 가장 적합한 종으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Labrecque, and T. Teodorescu. Preliminary Evaluation of a Living Willow (Salix spp) Sound Barrier Along a highway in Quebec, Canada. Journal of Arboriculture March 31 (2), 95-98, 2005.
  2. H. Bendtsen. Visual principles for the design of noise barriers. Sci Total Environ 67-71, 1997.
  3. Z. Maekawa. Noise reduction by screens. Appl Acoust 1, 157-73, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-682X(68)90020-0
  4. J.P.Arenas. Use of barriers. In: Crocker MJ, editor. Handbook of noise and vibration control. New Yark: John Wiley and Sons,pp 714-24, 2007a.
  5. J.P.Arenas., A.M. Monsalve. Modification of the different sound field by some noise barrier edge design. Int J Acoust Vib 6, 76-82, 2001.
  6. B.Kotzen.and C. English. Environmental noise barriers­A guide to their acoustic and visual design. E and FN Spon, London; pp.165, 1999.
  7. P. JorgeArenas. Potential problems with environmental sound barriers when used in mitigating surface transportation noise. Journal of Science of the Total Environments 405, 173-3-179, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.049
  8. J.L.Harper. Population Biology of plants. Academic Press, London, 892, 1997.
  9. J. Silvertown, and D. Charlesworth. Introduction to plant population biology, 4th ed.,Blackweli, Oxford, 2001.
  10. A.M.Mayer and A. Poljakoff Mayber. The germination of seeds, 4th ed;pergamon Press, Oxford, 1989.