The Effect of Three Surface Sealants on Microleakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations

복합레진으로 수복한 5급 와동의 미세누출에 대한 3종의 레진 표면 전색제의 효과

  • Lee, Won-Cheol (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University) ;
  • Ryu, Jae-Jun (Department of Esthetic Restorative Dentistry, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University)
  • 이원철 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 심미수복학과) ;
  • 류재준 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 심미수복학과)
  • Published : 2009.04.30

Abstract

Statement of problem: Microleakage at the occlusal and gingival margin of Class V cavities restored with composite resin has traditionally been considered an obstacle to successful restoration. Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of three different surface sealants(Fortify, Permaseal and Biscover LV) on the marginal sealing of Class V light-activated composite resin restorations(Z250). Material and methods: Forty noncarious human premolars and molars extracted within a three-month period were selected. Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and gingival margin in cementum were prepared in both buccal and lingual surfaces. The teeth, randomly assigned in four groups with twenty cavities in each group, were restored with composite resin after applying an adhesive system(Clearfil SE bond). After the finishing and polishing procedures, the restorations were covered with a specific surface sealants, except for the control samples, which were not sealed. After placing restorations, the specimens were thermocycled, and immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for twenty four hours and sectioned longitudinally. The marginal microleakage was evaluated at the occlusal and gingival interfaces using a microscope and compared among the four groups using ANOVA test and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test($\alpha$=0.05). Results: Statistical analysis showed that there was significantly less leakage when the surface sealants were used than there was in control group(P<.05). There were no significant differences of microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins among groups. There were no significant differences between microleakage of occlusal and gingival margins in each group. Fortify was not statistically different from control group at the gingival margin(P>.05). Conclusion: Application of surface sealants was an effective method of surface coating in reducing microleakage at occlusal and gingival margins of Class V composite resin restorations. However, it is certain that some microleakage still occurred despite the application of surface sealants, especially gingival margins.

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 복합 레진(Z250)으로 수복한 5급 와동에서 변연부 미세누출에 대한 3종의 레진 표면 전색제(Fortify, Permaseal, Biscover LV)의 효과를 평가하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 3개월 이내에 발거된 건전한 40개의 소구치와 대구치에 백악-법랑 경계를 중심으로 교합측 변연은 법랑질에, 치은측 변연은 백악질에 위치하도록 5급 와동을 협면과 설면에 각각 형성하였다. Clearfil SE bond와 복합 레진으로 충전한 치아를 무작위로 4개의 군으로 분류한 후 대조군을 제외한 실험군은 각각 20개의 와동에 레진 표면 전색제 3가지 제품을 각각 적용하고 24시간동안 생리식염수에 보관하였다. 보관한 시편을 열순환시킨 후 24시간 동안 2% methylene blue 염색 용액에 담가 두었다가 투명 레진에 매몰하였다. 매몰한 시편을 협설면의 충전물 중앙을 지나도록 절단한 후 현미경을 사용하여 교합면측과 치은측 변연부의 염색 용액의 침투도를 관찰함으로써 미세누출 여부와 정도를 분석하였다. 결과: 복합레진으로만 수복한 대조군은 실험군에 비해 교합면측과 치은측에서 미세누출이 컸으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있었다(P<0.05). 레진 표면 전색제를 적용한 실험군들 사이에는 교합면측과 치은측 모두 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다(P>0.05). 각 군의 교합면측과 치은측의 변연 미세누출을 비교 시 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. Fortify는 대조군과 비교시 치은측에서는 통계적으로 유의한 미세누출 감소 효과가 없었다. 결론: 복합레진으로 충전한 5급 와동 변연에 레진 표면 전색제를 적용한 경우 교합면측과 치은측 변연에서 미세누출 감소 효과가 있었다. 그러나 치은측 변연은 레진 표면 전색제의 적용 후에도 미세누출을 보이므로 각별히 주의를 요해야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:203-8
  2. Tjan AH, Tan DE. Microleakage at gingival margins of class V composite resin restorations rebonded with various low viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 1991;22:565-73
  3. Erhardt MC, Magalhães CS, Serra MC. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:396-402
  4. Pameijer CH, Wendt SL Jr. Microleakage of' surface-sealing' materials. Am J Dent 1995;8:43-6
  5. May KN Jr, Swift EJ Jr, Wilder AD Jr, Futrell SC. Effect of a surface sealant on microleakage of Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1996;9:133-6
  6. Torstenson B, Oden A. Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composite. Dent Mater 1989;5:218-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90064-X
  7. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. In vitro marginal microleakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light-cured glass-ionomer. Oper Dent 1992;17:7-12
  8. Kubo S, Yokota H, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Effect of low viscosity resin based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16:244-8
  9. Goracci G, Mori G, Martinis LC. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996;27:355-62
  10. Ramos RP,Chimello DT, Chinelatti MA, Dibb RGP, Mondelli J. Effect of three surface sealant on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25:448-53
  11. Reid JS, Saunders WP, Chen YY. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1991;22:295-8
  12. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M, Mattsson B. A new method for sealing composite resin contraction gaps in lined cavities. J Dent Res 1985;64:450-3 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640031201
  13. Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:552-9
  14. Owens BM, Johnson WW. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:481-8 https://doi.org/10.2341/05-77
  15. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on composite wear. Dent Mater 1993;9:108-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90085-5
  16. Ramos RP, Chinelatti MA, Chimello DT, Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low?viscosity resin systems. Quintessence Int 2002;33:450-6
  17. McCourt JW, Eick JD. Penetration of fissure sealants into contraction gaps of bulk packed auto-cured composite resin. J Pedod 1988;12:167-75
  18. Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, Kondamani J. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent 2000;48:78-80
  19. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:68-72
  20. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJ, Stark MM. Microleakage of several tooth-colored restorative materials in cervical cavities. A comparative study in vitro. Dent Mater 1986;2:228-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80019-7
  21. Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Self-bonding polymers as surface coatings of restorative resins to prevent staining. J Clin Dent 2006;17:134-7
  22. Hakimeh S, Vaidyanathan J, Houpt ML, Microleakage of compomer Class V restorations: effect of load cycling, thermal cycling, and cavity shape differences. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:194-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80012-8
  23. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk S, Ural C, Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:33-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.04.012
  24. Yang JS, Kim MH, Her S, Kim JG, Baik BJ. The effect of low-viscosity resin systems on marginal leakage of composite resin restorations. Korean J pedodontics 1997;24: 460-74
  25. Hegdahl T, Gjerdet NR. Contraction stresses of composite resin filling materials. Acta Odontol Scand 1977;35:191-5 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357709004654
  26. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of posterior resins: Effect of dentin-bonding agent and hygroscopic expansion. Dent Mater 1989;5:122-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90142-5
  27. Shortall AC. Microleakage, marginal adaptation and composite resin restorations. Br Dent J 1982;153:223-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804895
  28. Smith LA, O'Brien JA, Retief DH, Bradley EL. Microleakage of two dentinal bonding restorative systems. J Dent Res 1988;67:309-12
  29. Mandras RS, Retief DH, Russell CM. The effect of thermal and occlusal stresses of the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater 1991;7:63-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90030-3
  30. Rossomando KJ, Wendt SL Jr. Thermocycling and dwell times in microleakage evaluation for bonded restorations. Dent Mater 1995;11:47-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80008-5
  31. Wendt SL, Mclnnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90079-R
  32. Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the result of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater 1996;12:342-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80044-3
  33. Takeuchi CY, Orbegoso Flores VH, Palma Dibb RG, Panzeri H, Lara EH, Dinelli W. Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing. Oper Dent 2003;28:281-6
  34. Dickinson GL, Leinfelder KF. Mazer RB, Russell CM. Effect of a surface penetrating sealant on wear rate of posterior composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;121:251-5
  35. Kim SW, Cho YB, Hong CU. Effect of surface penetrating sealant on the microleakage of cervical restorations. Korean J Conser Dent 2001;26:64-76
  36. Cho YG, Choi HY. Effect of Biscover on the microleakage of composite resin restorations. Korean J Conser Dent 2005;30:355-62 https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.5.355
  37. Harper RH, Schnell RJ, Swartz ML, Phillips RW. In vivo measurements of thermal diffusion through restorations of various materials. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:180-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90185-7
  38. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16:316-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x