Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Workplace Smoking Ban Policy and Smoking Behavior

  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives : To evaluate the impact of the workplace smoking ban in South Korea, where the male smoking rate is high (57%), on smoking behavior and secondhand smoke exposure. Methods : A workplace smoking ban legislation implemented in April 2003 requires offices, meeting rooms, and lobbies located in larger than 3,000 square meter buildings (or 2,000 square meter multipurpose buildings) should be smoke free. A representative cross-sectional survey, the third wave (2005) of health supplements in the National Health Nutrition Survey of South Korea, was used to measure the impact of the 2003 workplace smoking ban implementation on smoking behavior. It contained 3,122 observations of adults 20 to 65 years old (excluding selfemployed and non-working populations). A multivariate statistical model was used. The self-reported workplace smoking ban policy (full workplace ban, partial workplace ban, and no workplace ban) was used as the key measure. Results : A full workplace smoking ban reduced the current smoking rate by 6.4 percentage points among all workers and also decreased the average daily consumption among smokers by 3.7 cigarettes relative to no smoking ban. Secondhand smoke showed a dramatic decrease of 86 percent (= -1.74/2.03)from the sample mean for full workplace ban. However, public anti-smoking campaign did not show any significant impact on smoking behavior. Conclusions : The full workplace ban policy is effective in South Korea. Male group showed bigger impact of smoking ban policy than female group. The public antismoking campaign did not show any effectiveness.

Keywords

References

  1. Yach D. Global threats demand global solutions: Tackling the tobacco epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000 [cited 2009 April 20 ]. Available from: URL:http://www.who.int/tobacco/dy_speeches5/en
  2. EPA designates passive smoking a class A or known human carcinogen. Washington, DC: U.S Environmental Protection Agency; 1993 [cited 2009 April 20]. Available from URL:http://www.epa.gov/history/topics/smoke/01.htm
  3. The NTP board of scientific counselors on carcinogens subcommittee meeting: A direct assault of key scientific principles. Commonwealth: Forces International; 1998 [cited 2009 April 20]. Available from URL:http://www.forces.org/ evidence/files/ntppref.htm
  4. The health consequences of involuntary smoking: A report of the surgeon general. Rockville; U.S. Public Health Service Office on Smoking and Health; 1986 [cited 2009 April 20]. Available from URL:http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/NN/B/C/P/M/_/nnbcpm.pdf
  5. Farrelly MC, Evans WN, Sfekas AE. The impact of workplace smoking bans: Results from a national survey. Tob Control 1999; 8(3): 272-277 https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.8.3.272
  6. National Health Enhancing Legislation. Seoul: Korea Ministry of Government Legislation; 2003 [cited 2009 April 20]. Available from URL:http://www.law.go.kr/LSW/HstLsTrmSc.do?menuId=1&p1=&query=#liBgcolor6
  7. OECD. OECD Health Data 2008: Statistics and Indicators for 30 Countries. Paris: OECD; 2008 [cited 2009 April 20]. Available from URL:http://www.oecd.org/health/healthdata
  8. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. Expenditure report for National Health Enhancing Fund. Seoul: Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs; 2009. (Korean)
  9. Biener L, Abrams DB, Follick MJ, Dean L. A comparative evaluation of a restrictive smoking policy in a general hospital. Am J Public Health 1989; 79(2): 192-195 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.2.192
  10. Petersen LR, Helgerson SD, Gibbons CM, Calhoun CR, Ciacco KH, Pitchford KC. Employee smoking behavior changes and attitudes following a restrictive policy on worksite smoking in a large company. Public Health Rep 1988; 103(2): 115-120
  11. Haw SJ, Gruer L. Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland: National cross sectional survey. Br Med J 2007; 335(7619): 549-552 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39315.670208.47
  12. Verdonk-Kleinjan WM, Knibbe RA, Tan FE, Willemsen MC, de Groot HN, de Vries H. Does the workplace-smoking ban eliminate differences in risk for environmental tobacco smoke exposure at work? Health Policy 2009; 92 (2-3): 197-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.03.009
  13. Bondy SJ, Zhang B, Kreiger N, Selby P, Benowitz N, Travis H, et al. Impact of an indoor smoking ban on bar workers exposure to secondhand smoke. J Occup Environ Med 2009; 51(5): 612-619 https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31819cb222
  14. Mullally BJ, Greiner BA, Allwright S, Paul G, Perry IJ, The effect of the Irish smoke-free workplace legislation on smoking among bar workers. Eur J Public Health 2009; 19(2): 206-211 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckp008
  15. Khang YH, Yun SC, Cho HJ, Jung-Choi K. The impacts of governmental antismoking policy on socioeconomic disparities in cigarette smoking in South Korea. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11(3): 262-269 https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntn036
  16. Evans WN, Farrelly MC, Montgomery E. Do workplace smoking bans reduce smoking? Am Econ Rev 1999; 89(5): 728-747 https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.4.728

Cited by

  1. Employee and Employer Support for Workplace-based Smoking Cessation: Results from an International Survey vol.52, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.l10075
  2. Secondhand smoke at work vol.10, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1097/aci.0b013e32833649b3
  3. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of India’s 2008 Prohibition of Smoking in Public Places in Gujarat vol.8, pp.12, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph8051271
  4. South Korean Military Service Promotes Smoking: A Quasi-Experimental Design vol.53, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.433
  5. Socio-demographic and clinical factors contributing to smoking cessation among men: a four-year follow up study of the Korean Health Panel Survey vol.16, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3583-y
  6. Effect of a smoke-free policy on staff attitudes and behaviours within an Australian metropolitan health service: a 3 year cross-sectional study vol.41, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1071/ah15159
  7. A social cognitive approach to understanding employee substance use: An example from the Philippines vol.34, pp.4, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2019.1646658
  8. Effects of work-related factors on self-reported smoking among female workers in call centers: a cross-sectional study vol.31, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-019-0286-8