A Study on Promoting Senior Citizens' Use of e-Government Services as an Effective Means for Reducing Digital Divide

정보격차 해소 차원에서의 전자정부 서비스 이용촉진 연구 : 장노년층 사례를 중심으로

  • Received : 2010.03.25
  • Accepted : 2010.06.11
  • Published : 2010.06.30

Abstract

E-government refers to the delivery of government information and services online through the Internet or other digital means. Unlike traditional structures, e-government systems are two-way, and available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The interactive aspects of e-government allow both citizens and bureaucrats to send and receive information. Criticism about the provision of e-Government services, however, has proposed a more user-oriented approach. The user needs to be placed at the center of the development and the provision of e-Government services. Furthermore, e-government literatures seldom explore acceptance issues among the aged. Attempting to address this gap, we take the approach based on a combination of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior, with data gathered via a questionnaire from service users over 50 years and older. The findings indicate that perceived usefulness, ease of use, subjective norms, trust, visibility, facilitating conditions and political efficacy are direct or indirect predictors of citizens‘ intention to use an e-government service. Implications of this study for research and practice are presented.

Keywords

References

  1. 강흥수, "정치효능감 개념에 대한 심리학적 재조명", 한국정치학회 연례학술대회, (1998), pp.245-267.
  2. 고경민, 김 혁, "시민중심적 전자정부 구현을 위한 정책 방향:서울시 전자정부 서비스에 대한 시민평가를 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 제9권, 제2호(2005), pp.119-148.
  3. 고정현, 이재웅, "정보격차 현황 분석과 제언, 정보격차 이슈리포트", 한국정보문화진흥원, 2005.
  4. 김미량, 김태웅, 김재현, "실버세대의 인터넷 활용 영향요인 연구", 한국인터넷정보학회논문지, 제10권, 제1호(2009), pp.145-158.
  5. 김은정, 박정철, 김태웅, "정보화 취약계층을 위한 인터넷 활용의도 결정요인 연구:장노년층 사례를 중심으로", Telecommunications Review, 제19권, 제6호(2009), pp.936-948.
  6. 김혜경, "노인의 정보화 촉진 및 정보격차 해소를 위한 통합방안, 정보격차이슈리포트", 통권 8호, 한국정보문화진흥원, 2004.
  7. 류혜연, "전자정부서비스 활용에 관한 실증적 연구:수요자를 중심으로", 한국행정연구, 제12권, 제3호2003, pp.274-301.
  8. 박선주, "전자정부 해외 동향:UN E-Government Survey 2008 결과 분석", 한국정보사회진흥원 전자정부 포커스, 08-01, 2008.
  9. 박선희, 시민적 관여가 컴퓨터 매개 정치커뮤니케이션에 미치는 영향, 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 1998.
  10. 변미리, "전자정부 성과평가방법:서울시 전자정부 추진실적 평가의 Pilot Sorvey를 중심으로", 한국행정학회 2004년도 춘계학술대회 발표논문집, (2004), pp.31-40.
  11. 안형기, 신범순, "정치참여 결정요인으로서의 인지적 효능감:네티즌의 투표행위를 중심으로", 한국정책과학회보, 제10권, 제1호(2006), pp.27-49.
  12. 정윤, 문정만, 김홍원, 전자정부 온라인 민원 서비스 품질과 성과에 관한 연구, 한국경영정보학회 추계학술대회, (2003), pp.680-687.
  13. 정철현, "전자정부 웹 사이트 이용의 영향요인에 관한 연구", 한국행정연구, 제13권, 제4호(2004), pp.122-148.
  14. 통계청, 2009년 통계자료, http://kostat.go.kr, 2009.
  15. 하영수, "전자정부 구현에 대한 주민수용태도에 관한 연구", 한국지방자치학회보, 제14권, 제2호(2002), pp.257-274.
  16. 한국경제신문, 2010년 1월 15일 기사, 2010.
  17. 한국인터넷진흥원, 2009 인터넷이용실태조사, 2009.
  18. Ajzen, I., "From Intentions to Actions:A Theory of Planned Behavior", in J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann(Eds), Action-Control: Form Cognition to Behavior, Heidelberg: Springer., 1985.
  19. Ash, J. S., "Factors Affecting the Diffusion of Online End User Literature Searching", Bull Med Libr Assoc., Vol.87, No.1(1999), pp.58-66.
  20. Australian Government, Australians' use of and satisfaction with E-Government services. Barton:Commonwealth of Australia, 2005.
  21. Bandura A., Self-efficacy:the Exercise of Control. New York, W. H. Freeman, 1997.
  22. Bearden, W. O., R. Netemeyer, and J. Teel, "Measurement of Consumer Susceptibility to Interpersonal Influence", Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15(1989), pp.473-481. https://doi.org/10.1086/209186
  23. Berner Fachhochschule and Unisys, E-Go vernment trendbarometer Thalwil:Unisys (Schweiz) AG, 2005.
  24. Bertot, J. C. and P. T. Jaeger, User-centered E-Government:Challenges and benefits for government web sites. Government Information Quarterly, Vol.23, No.2(2006), pp.163-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.02.001
  25. Bertot, J. C. and P. T. Jaeger, "The E-Government paradox:Better customer service doesn't necessarily cost less", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.25, No.2(2008), pp.149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.10.002
  26. Bucar, A., C. Renold, and M. Henke, "How do older netcitizens compare with their younger counterparts", Cyber Psychology and Behavior, Vol.2(1999), pp.505-513. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1999.2.505
  27. Carpenter, B. D. and S. Buday, "Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.23(2007), pp.3012-3024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.015
  28. Carter, L. and F. Belanger, "The Utilization of e-government services:citizen trust, innovation and acceptance", Information Systems Journal, Vol.15, No.1(2005), pp.5-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
  29. Chen, A. J., S. L. Pan, J. Zhang, W. W. Huang, and S. Zhu, "Managing e-government implementation in China:A process perspective", Information and Management, Vol.46, No.4(2009), pp.203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.02.002
  30. Cheung, W., M. K. Chang, and V. S. Lai, "Prediction of Internet and World Wide Web usage at work:a test of an extended Triandis model", Decision Support Systems, Vol.30, No.1(2000), pp.83-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00125-1
  31. Chin, W. W., "Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling", MIS Quarterly, Vol.22, No.1(1998), pp.7-16.
  32. Cody, M. and J. Michael, "Silver Surfers:Training and Evaluating Internet Use among Older Adult Learners", Communication of Education, Vol.48, No.4(1999), pp.269-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379178
  33. Cothey, V., "A longitudinal study of world wide web users' information searching behavior", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, No.2(2002), pp.67-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10011
  34. Coursey, D. and D. F. Norris, "Models of egovernment: Are they correct? An empirical assessment", Public Administration Review, Vol.68, No.3(2008), pp.523-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
  35. Davis, F. D. and V. Venkatesh, "A Critical Assessment of Potential Measurement Biases in the Technology Acceptance Model :Three Experiments", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.45, No.1 (1996), pp.19-45. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040
  36. Davis, F. D., "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol.13, No.3(1989), pp.319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  37. Dickinson, A., R. Eisma, and P. Gregor, Challenging interfaces/redesigning Users. In Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability, Vancouver, CA, (2003), pp.61-68.
  38. DiMaggio, P., E. Hargittai, W. R. Neuman, and J. P. Robinson, "Social Implications of the Internet", Annual Review of Sociology, Vol.27(2001), pp.307-336. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307
  39. Dodds, W. B., K. B. Monroe, and D. Grewal, "Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers' Product Evaluations", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.28(1991), pp.307-319. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172866
  40. Elsheikh, Y., A. Cullen, and D. Hobbs, "e- Government in Jordan:Challenges and opportunities, Transforming Government:People", Process and Policy, Vol.2, No.2(2008), pp.83-103.
  41. Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior:An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
  42. Fornell, C. and D. F. Larcker, "Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Errors", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.2(1981), pp. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  43. Fox, S. and M. Madden, Generations online :Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2006.
  44. Frissen, V., The myth of the digital divide. In A. Zerdick, A. Picot, and K. Schrape, et al.(Eds.), E-merging media:Communication and the media economy of the future, Berlin:Springer, (2005), pp.271-284
  45. Gardner C. and D. L. Amoroso, "Development of an instrument to measure the acceptance of internet technology by consumer", Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004.
  46. Gauld, R. and S. Goldfinch, Dangerous enthusiasms: e-Government, computer failure and information system development. Dunedin Otago University Press, 2006.
  47. Gauld, R., S. Goldfinch, and S. Horsburgh, "Do they want it? Do they use it? The Demand-Side of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.27(2010), pp.177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.12.002
  48. Gefen, D., E. Karahanna, and D. Straub, "Trust and TAM in online shopping:an integrated model", MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, No.1(2003), pp.51-90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  49. Heeks, R. and S. Bailur, "Analyzing E-Government research:Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.24, No. 2(2007), pp.243-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005
  50. Helbig, N., J. Gil-Garcia, and E. Ferro, "Understanding the complexity of electronic government:Implications from the digital divide literature", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.26, No.1(2009), pp.89-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.05.004
  51. Hill, C. W. L., "Cooperation, opportunism, and the Invisible Hand:Implications for Transaction Cost Theory", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.35(1990), pp.265-291.
  52. Horst, M., M. Kuttschreuter, and J. M. Gutteling, "Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands", Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.23, No.4(2007), pp. 1838-1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.11.003
  53. Howel, J. M. and C. A. Higgins, "Champion of Technological Innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.2(1990), pp.317-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393393
  54. Hung, S-Y., C-M. Chang, and T-J. Yu, "Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services:The case of online tax filing and payment system", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.23, No.1 (2006), pp.97-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005
  55. Jaeger, P. T. and C. A. Bowman, Understanding disability:Inclusion, access, diversity and civil rights. Westport, CT:Praeger, 2005.
  56. Joseph, R. C. and P. Jeffers, "e-Government in the Caribbean nations", Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Vol.12, No.1(2009), pp.52-70.
  57. Karahanna, E. and D. W. Straub, "The Psychological Orgins of Perceived Usefulness and Eace of Use", Information and Management, Vol.35(1999), pp.237-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2
  58. Karahasanovic, A., P. B. Brandtzg, J. Heim, M. Luders, L. Vermeir, J. Pierson, B. Lievens, J. Vanattenhoven, and G. Jans. "Cocreation and user-generated content-elderly people's user requirementsv Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.25(2009), pp.655-678.
  59. Kiel, J. M., "The digital divide:Internet and e-mail use by the elderly", Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, Vol. 30(2005), pp.19-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639230500066900
  60. Kluver, R. and Yang Chen, "The Internet in China:A Meta-Review of Research", The Information Society, Vol.21(2005), pp.301-308. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240591007616
  61. Kolsaker, A. and L. Lee-Kelley, "Citizens' attitudes towards e-government and e-governance: A UK study", International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol.21, No.7(2008), pp.723-738. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810904532
  62. Kubitschke, C., "The Demographic change :Impacts of New Technologies and Information Society", Executive Summary from europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/so cial_situation/docs/lot7_ict_summary_en.pdf, 2005.
  63. Lam, Jolie C. Y. and Lee, K. O. Matthew, "Digital Inclusiveness-Longitudinal Study of Internet Adoption by Older Adults", Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22, No.4(2006), pp.177-206. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222220407
  64. Layne, K. and J. Lee, "Developing fully functional e-government:A four stage model", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.18 (2001), pp.122-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1
  65. Perceived risks, counter-beliefs, and intentions to use anti-/counter-terrorism websites: An exploratory study of governmentcitizens online interactions in a turbulent environment
  66. Lee, J. and H. R. Rao, "Perceived risks, counter- beliefs, and intentions to use anti- /counter-terrorism websites:An exploratory study of government-citizens online interactions in a turbulent environment", Decision Support Systems, Vol.43, No.4(2007), pp.431-1449
  67. Millward, P., The Grey Digital Divide: Perception, Exclusion and Barriers of Access to the Internet for Older People, First Monday, http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/ issue8_7/millward/index.html.
  68. Moore, G. C. and T. Benbasat, "Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation", Information System Research, Vol.2(1991), pp.192-222. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192
  69. Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert, and M. Stansbury, Virtual Inequality:Beyond the Digital Divide. Washington, DC:Georgetown University Press, 2003.
  70. Norris, D. and M. Moon, "Advancing egovernment at the grassroots:Tortoise or hare?", Public Administration Review, Vol. 65, No.1(2005), pp.64-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x
  71. Oh, S. J., J. H. Ahn, and B.S. Kim, "Adoption of broadband Internet in Korea:the role of experience in building attitudes", Journal of Information Technology, Vol.18, No.4(2003), pp.267-280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268396032000150807
  72. Opalinski, L., "Older Adults and the Digital Divide:Assessing Results of a Web-based Survey", Journal of Technology Human Ser vice, Vol.18, No.3-4(2001), pp.203-221. https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v18n03_13
  73. Pankowska, M., "National frameworks' survey on standardization of e-government documents and processes for interoperability", Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.3, No.3(2008), pp.64-82.
  74. Parent, M., C. A. Vandebeek, and A. C. Gemino, "Building citizen trust through e-government", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.22(2005), pp.720-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2005.10.001
  75. Parka, N., R. Romanb, S. Leec, and J. E. Chung, User acceptance of a digital library system in developing countries:An application of the Technology Acceptance Model, International Journal of Information Management, Vol.29(2009), pp.196-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.07.001
  76. Phang, C. W., J. Sutanto, A. Kankanhalli, Y. Li, B. C. Y. Tan, and H.-H. Teo, "Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems :a study in the context of e-Government services", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol.53, No.4(2006), pp. 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.883710
  77. Rogers, E. M., Diffusion of innovation(4th Ed.), The Free Press New York, 1995.
  78. Roy, R., "E-service delivery and new governance capacities:'Service Canada' as a case study", International Journal of Services Technology and Management, Vol.7, No.3(2006), pp.253-271. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTM.2006.010050
  79. Ryu, M., S. Kim, and E. Lee, "Understanding the Factors Affecting Online Elderly User's Participation in Video UCC Services", Journal of Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.25, No.3(2009), pp.619-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.013
  80. Thomas, J. and G. Streib, "The new face of government:citizen-initiated contacts in the era of E-government", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 13(2003), pp.83-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpart/mug010
  81. Thong, J. Y. L., W. Hong, and K.-Y. Tam, "Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries:What are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences?", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.57 (2002), pp.215-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(02)91024-4
  82. Tolbert, C. J., K. Mossberger, and R. Mc- Neal, "Institutions, policy innovation, and egovernment in the American states", Public Administration Review, Vol.68, No.3(2008), pp.549-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00890.x
  83. Turner, P., S. Turner, and van de G. Walle, "How older people account for their experiences with interactive technology", Behaviou and Information Technology, Vol.26, No.3(2007), pp.287-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601173499
  84. van Dijk, J., O. Peters, and W. Ebbers. "Explaining the acceptance and use of government internet services:A multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the Netherlands", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.25, No.3(2008), pp.379-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.09.006
  85. Venkatesh, V., "Determinants of perceived ease of use:integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model", Information Systems Research, Vol.11(2000), pp.342-365. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  86. Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, F. D. Davis, "User acceptance of information technology:toward a unified view", MIS Quarterly, Vol.27, No.3(2003), pp.425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
  87. Verdegem, P. and G. Verleye, "User-centered e-government in practice:A compre hensive model for measuring user satisfaction", Government Information Quarterly, Vol.26, No.3(2009), pp.487-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2009.03.005
  88. Warkentin, M., D. Gefen, P. A. Pavlou, and G. M. Rose, "Encouraging Citizen Adoption of e-Government by Building Trust", Electronic Markets, Vol.12, No.3(2002), pp.157-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/101967802320245929
  89. West, D., "e-Government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes", Public Administration Review, Vol. 64, No.1(2004), pp.15-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00343.x
  90. Yang, K. and S. Rho, "e-Government for better performance:Promises, realities, and challenges", International Journal of Public Administration, Vol.30, No.11(2007), pp.1197-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701225556
  91. Zeithaml, V. A., "Consumer Perception of Price, Quality and Value:a Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence", Journal of Marketing, Vol.52, No.3(1988), pp.2-22. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446
  92. Zucker, L. G., "Production of Trust:Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840.1920", Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.8(1986), pp.53-111.