The Comparative Study on Age-associated Gait Analysis in Normal Korean

우리나라 연령별 보행분석 비교연구

  • Yoon, Na-Mi (Department of Physical Therapy, Mokpo Science College) ;
  • Yoon, Hee-Jong (Department of Physical Therapy, Mokpo Science College) ;
  • Park, Jang-Sung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, Seonam University) ;
  • Jeong, Hwa-Su (Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, Seonam University) ;
  • Kim, Geon (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health and Welfare, Dongshin University)
  • 윤나미 (목포과학대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 윤희종 (목포과학대학 물리치료과) ;
  • 박장성 (서남대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 정화수 (서남대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김건 (동신대학교 보건복지대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2010.01.10
  • Accepted : 2010.03.13
  • Published : 2010.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to establish reference data for temporo-spatial, kinematic and kinetic parameters for normal Koreans as they age. Methods: Normal adults and children without a previous history of musculoskeletal problems were enrolled in this study. The normal subjects were divided by age into three groups: Group I: children ($11.95{\pm}0.29$ years); Group II: young adults ($23.90{\pm}3.67$ years); Group III: older adults ($71.40{\pm}4.08$ years). The temporo-spatial and kinematic data were measured using 6 MX3 cameras while each subject walked through a 10 m walkway at a self-selected speed. The kinetic data were measured using 2 force plates and were calculated by inverse dynamics. Results: Motion patterns are typically associated with a specific phase of the gait cycle. Our results were as follows: 1. There were significant differences between the different age groups in temporo-spatial parameters such as cadence, double support, time of foot off, stride length, step length, and walking speed. 2. There were significant differences between the groups in kinematic parameters such as range of motion (ROM) of the hip, knee and ankle in the sagittal plane, ROM of the pelvis, hip and knee in the coronal plane and ROM of the pelvis, hip and ankle in the transverse plane. 3. There were significant differences between the groups in kinetic parameters such as joint moments of force, joint mechanical power generation or absorption and ground reaction forces. Conclusion: The results of this study can be utilized (a) as a reference for kinematic and kinetic data of gait analysis in normal Koreans, and (b) as an aide in evaluating and treating patients who have problems relating to gait.

Keywords

References

  1. Napier J. The antiquity of human walking. Sci Am. 1967;216(4):56-66. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0467-56
  2. Scott SH, Winter DA. Internal forces at chronic running injury sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;22(3):357-69.
  3. Harris GF, Wertsch JJ. Procedures for gait analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(2):216-25.
  4. Kang HG, Dingwell JB. Effects of walking speed, strength and range of motion on gait stability in healthy adults. J Biomech. 2008;41(14):2899-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.08.002
  5. Eckert HM. Motor development. Indianapolis, Brown & Benchmark, 1987.
  6. Sutherland DH, Olshen RA, Biden EN et al. The development of mature walking. London, England: Mac Keith Press, 1988.
  7. Nigg BM, Fisher V, Ronsky JL. Gait characteristics as a function of age and gender. Gait Posture. 1994;2(4):213-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(94)90106-6
  8. Kwon YS, Kang GC, Jung BO et al. Moment and power of lower extremities during hemiplegic gait. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 1999;11(1):55-61.
  9. Kim YS, Kim EJ, Seo CJ. The comparative analysis of EMG and gait patterns of lower extremities during going up stairs and down. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2006;45(4):535-45.
  10. Eun SD. An investigation of the effect of the height of wteps on the joint moment of lower extremities of the elderly while walking downstairs. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics. 2006;16(4):31-8. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2006.16.4.031
  11. Riener R, Rabuffetti M, Frigo C. Stair ascent and descent at different inclinations. Gait Posture. 2002;15(1):32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00162-X
  12. Kim YS. Assessment of the indoor enviornment in school buildings. Journal of Korean Society of School Health. 1991;4(1):3-6.
  13. Ericson MO, Nisell R, Arborelius UP et al. Muscular activity during ergometer cycling. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1985;17(2):53-61.
  14. Mynark RG, Koceja DM. Down training of the elderly soleus H reflex with the use of a spinally induced balance perturbation. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93(1):127-33. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00007.2001
  15. Garrett M, McElroy AM, Staines A. Locomotor milestones and babywalkers: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2002;324(7352):1494. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1494
  16. Sutherland DH. Dimensionless gait measurements and gait maturity. Gait Posture. 1996;4(3): 209-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(95)01056-4
  17. Rose J. Human walking. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1994.
  18. Kim K, Seo SK, Yoon HJ et al. Correlations between muscle strength of the ankle and balance and walking in the elderly. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2008;20(1):33-40.
  19. Park JS, Choi EY, Hwang TY. The effects of strengthening leg muscular strength on the elderly's walking and balance ability. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2002;14(2):133-44.
  20. Oberg T, Karsznia A, Oberg K. Basic gait parameters: reference data for normal subjects, 10-79 years of age. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1993;30(2):210-23.
  21. Kirtley C. Clinical Gait analysis: theory and practice. London, Churchill Livingstone, 2006.
  22. Chung CY, Park MS, Choi IH et al. Three dimensional gait analysis in normal Korean -a preliminary report-. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2005;40(1):83-8. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.2005.40.1.83
  23. Watelain E, Barbier F, Allard P et al. Gait pattern classification of healthy elderly men based on biomechanical data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(5):579-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90038-8
  24. Kim SB. Analysis of three dimensional kinematics and kinetics of the normal gait in Korean. Seoul National University. Dissertation of Master's Degree. 2004.
  25. Whittle MW. Gait analysis: an introduction. 4th ed. New York, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007.
  26. James G, Parker AW. Active and passive mobility of lower limb joints in elderly men and women. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;68(4):162-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-198908000-00002
  27. Winter DA. The biomechanical patterns in normal walking. J Mot Behav. 1983;15(4):302-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1983.10735302
  28. Perry J. Gait analysis: Normal and Pathological function. Thorofare, New Jersey, Slack, 1992.
  29. Giakas G, Baltzopoulos V. Time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces during walking: an investigation of variability and symmetry. Gait Posture. 1997;5(3):189-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(96)01083-1
  30. Riley PO, Paolini G, Della Croce U et al. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture. 2007;26(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003
  31. Moon GS, Choi JY, Kim RB. The kinetic analysis of the ankle joint and lower limbs muscle for the different walking speed. The Korean Journal of Physical Education. 2005;44(6):621-32.
  32. Patikas D, Wolf SI, Schuster W et al. Electromyographic patterns in children with cerebral palsy: do they change after surgery? Gait Posture. 2007;26(3):362-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.10.012
  33. Romkes K, Brunner R. An electromyographic analysis of obligatory (hemiplegic cerebral palsy) and voluntary (normal) unilateral toe-walking. Gait Posture. 2007;26(4):577-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.010