Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지)

Korean Society of Computer Information (한국컴퓨터정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Reconsideration on the Efficiency of the Extended Projection Principle

데이터분석을 통한 확대투사원리의 효율성 제고

  • 주치운 (인하공업전문대학 호텔경영과)
  • Received : 2011.10.18
  • Accepted : 2011.10.24
  • Published : 2011.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Main concern will be put at suggesting an alternative idea about the basic notion of the Extended Projection Principle (henceforth, ECP) which has been slightly changed since the initial appearance of the EPP. The EPP had been dependent on Case and theta-role under the era of the early generative grammar, whereas it was reduced only to the categorial feature [D] under the minimalism. Various data such as Locative Inversion constructions, there-expletive constructions, and sentences related to binding theory will be dealt with to suggest an plausible alternative idea. As a conclusion, it will be attested that the SPEC position of the inflectional clause should be filled with a maximally projected lexical item. This conclusion will be reached by analyzing lots of linguistic data.

본 연구는 다양한 언어 데이터 분석을 통해 최소주의에서의 확대투사원리에 대한 대안을 제시하는데 역점을 둔다. 확대투사원리는 두 가지 원리에서 도출되는데, 하나는 표준이론에서의 투사원리이고 다른 하나는 주어위치는 반드시 채워야 한다는 요건을 근거한다. 이 두 원리가 하나로 병합된 확대투사원리는 이후에 계속해서 그 개념이 변한다. 최소주의 출현 이전에는 격에 의존적이었으나, Chomsky(1995)의 최소주의 하에서는 범주자질 [D]의 특성으로 귀착된다. 그러나 본 연구에서는 위치 도치 구문, 허사 there 구문, 결속이론과 같은 구문에서의 다양한 언어 데이터를 분석하여 굴절어구의 지정어 위치는 최대로 투사된 어휘항목에 의해 반드시 채워져야 한다는 대안을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Belletti, A. (1988). "The Case of Unacussatives," Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1-34.
  2. Branigan, P. (2000). Binding Effects with Covert Movement, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 353-357.
  3. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Foris.
  4. Chomsky, N. (1993). A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory. The View from Building 29. K. Hale & S. Keyser (eds), MIT Press.
  5. Chomsky, Noam. (1994). "Bare phrase structure ." In MIT Working papers in Linguistics 5: 1-51. Cambridge Mass.
  6. Chomsky, N. (1995). Categories and transformations. In The minimalist program, 219-394. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
  7. Chomsky, N. (1999).Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  8. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed by Roger Martin, David Michael, and Juan Uriagreka, 89-155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  9. Chomsky, N & H. Lasnik.(1991). To appear in J. Jacobs, A. van Stechow, W. Sternefeld, and T. Vennemann (eds) Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
  10. Collins, C. (1996) Local Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  11. Jang Y.-J. (1997). Tense and Complementizer Feature-Checking. Hankuk Publisher.
  12. Jonas, D.(1996). "Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English," Doctoral Dissertation, Havard University, Cambridge.
  13. Joo, C.-W. (2003). A Study on Covert Moveme nt, STEM Journal 3 (2)
  14. Lasnik, H. (1992). "Case and Expletives: Notes toward a Parametric Account," Lingu istic Inquiry 23: 381-405.
  15. Lasnik, H. (1995). "Case and Expletives Revisited: On Greed and Other Human Failings," Linguistic Inquiry 27: 615-634.
  16. Lasnik, H. (1996). Levels of Representation and The Elements of Anaphora. To be presen ted at the workshop on "Binding and Atomism," Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics, Leiden. University of Connec ticut.
  17. Lasnik, H. (2001). A Note On the EPP. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 356-362. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2001.32.2.356
  18. Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistics Inquiry 20: 365-424.