DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influencing factors on the final color of laminate veneer restorations with various IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ ingots

다양한 IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ ingot으로 제작한 laminate veneer의 최종 색조에 대한 영향

  • Yang, Mi-Seon (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dental Science, The Catholic University of Korea) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Gyu (Department of Prosthodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 양미선 (가톨릭대학교 임상치과학대학원 치과보철학과) ;
  • 김석규 (성균관대학교 의과대학 삼성서울병원 치과진료부 보철과)
  • Received : 2011.10.03
  • Accepted : 2011.10.18
  • Published : 2011.10.31

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to colorimetrically evaluate the masking effect of different opacity of ingots on the final shade of IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ laminate veneer restorations using the CIE $L^*a^*b^*$ system. Materials and methods: Six porcelain disks of IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ system (translucency: E 01, E 03, E 0C-1, E TC-1, E TC-2, E TC-3) were fabricated with 7 mm in diameter and 0.6 mm in thickness. Six extracted human incisors (shade: A1, A3, A4, B2, B3, C3) were used as the abutment specimens. The incisors were prepared using a diamond wheel and made with a flat labial surface on the middle 1/3. For each combination of different shades of abutments and copings, the change in color was measured with a colorimeter. CIE $L^*a^*b^*$ coordinates were recorded for each specimen. Color differences (${\Delta}E$) were calculated. Descriptive statistical analysis was done. Results: ${\Delta}E$ values were significantly affected by coping translucency and abutment shade (P<.05). The color differences (${\Delta}E$) of laminate veneers among abutments with A3, B3, C3, and A4 shade were mostly below 2.7 which was within the clinically acceptable range, while color differences between A4 and B2, A3 and B2, and A1 and A4 showed more than 2.7. Conclusion: The final color of IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ laminate veneers were significantly influenced by translucency of the coping and shade of abutment teeth. The large value difference of abutment teeth limited the masking ability by laminate veneers.

연구 목적: IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ system의 ingot은 다양한 반투명도를 가지고 있지만, 실제 다양한 색조의 자연치를 배경으로 각각의 ingot을 laminate veneer로 제작했을 때 어느 정도의 차폐능력을 나타내는지 알 수 없다. 본 연구의 목적은 반투명도가 서로 다른 ingot으로 제작한 IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ laminate veneer 수복 시 다른 색상의 지대치상에서 최종 색조의 차이(color difference, ${\Delta}E$)를측정, 분석해서 그 차폐효과를 평가하고, 최종 색조에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: Laminate veneer 수복을 위해 삭제된 6가지 다른 색조(A1, A3, A4, B2, B3, C3)의 자연치아 위에 반투명도가 서로 다른 6가지 IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ ingot (E 01, E 03, E OC1, E TC1, E TC2, E TC3)으로 제작된 총 두께 0.6 mm의 도재 시편들을 translucent shade의 시적용 합착제로 시적한 뒤 각 시편 조합의 색조를 색채계(colorimeter)를 이용하여 측정하였다. 서로 다른 색조의 지대치아 위에서 측정된 도재시편들의 색차를 비교, 분석하였다. 결과: 지대치 색조 및 coping의 반투명도에 따라서 laminate veneer 수복물의 최종 색조가 다르게 나타났다(P<.05). 모든 도재 시편에서 A3, B3, 그리고 C3 shade를 가진 지대치들 사이의 평균 색차값(${\Delta}E$)이 2.7 이하로 나타났고, 지대치들 간의 색조가 A3 와 A4, B3 와 A4, 그리고 C3 와 A4 인 경우 평균 색차값은 몇 가지 도재 시편에서 2.7 이하를 나타내어 laminate veneer 수복물에 의한 지대치 색조의 차폐효과를 보여 주었다. 반면, A1 과 B2 shade의 지대치는 다른 지대치들과 비교하여 높은 색조 차이를 보였으며, 특히A4와 B2, A3 와 B2, 그리고 A1 과 A4 색조의 지대치들 사이에는 그 색조 차이가 컸다. 결론: IPS Empress Esthetic$^{(R)}$ coping으로 제작된 laminate veneer의 최종 색조는 지대치 색조 및 coping의 반투명도에 의해 영향을 받았다. 서로 다른 $a^*$$b^*$ 값을 나타내는 지대치들의 색상 차이는 어느 정도 차폐 되는 효과를 보여주고 있으나, 명도($L^*$)의 차이가 많이 나타나는 지대치 색조들을 차폐하는 것은 한계가 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Davis LG, Ashworth PD, Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent 1998;26:547-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00031-6
  2. Faunce FR, Myers DR. Laminate veneer restoration of permanent incisors. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:790-2. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1976.0055
  3. Helpin ML, Fleming JE. Laboratory technique for the laminate veneer restoration. Pediatr Dent 1982;4:48-50.
  4. Barreto MT, Shiu A, Renner RP. Anterior porcelain laminate veneers: clinical and laboratory procedures. Quintessence Dent Technol 1986;10:493-9.
  5. Garber DA, Goldstein RE, Feinman RA. Porcelain Laminate Veneers. Chicago, Quintessence Pub Co., 1988.
  6. Fradeani M. Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:216-25.
  7. Belser UC, Magne P, Magne M. Ceramic laminate veneers: continuous evolution of indications. J Esthet Dent 1997;9: 197-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00941.x
  8. Yaman P, Qazi SR, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME. Effect of adding opaque porcelain on the final color of porcelain laminates. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:136-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70226-9
  9. Antonson SA, Anusavice KJ. Contrast ratio of veneering and core ceramics as a function of thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14: 316-20.
  10. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Influence of ceramic and cement thickness on the masking of various types of opaque posts. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70035-7
  11. Davis BK, Aquilino SA, Lund PS, Diaz-Arnold AM, Denehy GE. Colorimetric evaluation of the effect of porcelain opacity on the resultant color of porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5: 130-6.
  12. Davis BK, Papcum LJ, Johnston WM. Effect of cement shade on final shade of porcelain veneers. J Dent Res 1991;70:297 Abstract 250.
  13. Davis BK, Scott JO, Johnston WM. Effect of porcelain shades on final shade of porcelain veneers. J Dent Res 1991;70:475 Abstract 1671.
  14. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain [abstract]. J Dent Res 1983;62:297 Abstract 1099.
  15. Calamia JR, Simonsen RJ, Effect of coupling agents on bond strength of etched porcelain[abstract]. J Dent Res 1984;63:179 Abstract 79.
  16. Hasegawa A, Ikeda I, Kawaguchi S. Color and translucency of in vivo natural central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:418-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70036-9
  17. Kim HE, Cho IH, Lim JH, Lim HS. Shade analysis of anterior teeth using digital shade analysis system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41:565-81.
  18. Shimada K, Kakehashi Y, Matsumura H, Tanoue N. In vivo quantitative evaluation of tooth color with hand-held colorimeter and custom template. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:389-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.006
  19. Bolt RA, Bosch JJ, Coops JC. Influence of window size in small-window colour measurement, particularly of teeth. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1133-42. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/39/7/006
  20. Wee AG, Monaghan P, Johnston WM. Variation in color between intended matched shade and fabricated shade of dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:657-66. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.125727
  21. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012
  22. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120801
  23. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ. Performance assessment of colorimetric devices on dental porcelains. J Dent Res 1989; 68:1755-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120701
  24. O Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM. A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shades. J Dent Res 1990;69:1762-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690111001
  25. Johnston WM, Kao EC. Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68: 819-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680051301
  26. Preston JD. Current status of shade selection and color matching. Quintessence Int 1985;16:47-58.
  27. Sorensen JA, Torres TJ. Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part I: A systematic method for shade determination. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90163-6
  28. Sorensen JA, Torres TJ. Improved color matching of metal ceramic restorations. Part II: Procedures for visual communication. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:669-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90417-3
  29. Saleski CG. Color, light, and shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:263-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90033-9
  30. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. I. The three-dimensional nature of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:416-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(73)80019-8
  31. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. II. Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:556-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90036-X
  32. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. 3. Color control. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:146-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90049-3
  33. Macentee M, Lakowski R. Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:203-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00494.x
  34. Tung FF, Goldstein GR, Jang S, Hittelman E. The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88: 585-90. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129803
  35. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Ha¨mmerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002; 81:578-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100815
  36. Johnston WM, Hesse NS, Davis BK, Seghi RR. Analysis of edgelosses in reflectance measurements of pigmented maxillofacial elastomer. J Dent Res 1996;75:752-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750020401
  37. van der Burgt TP, ten Bosch JJ, Borsboom PC, Kortsmit WJ. A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:155-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90099-X
  38. Brewer JD, Garlapo DA, Chipps EA, Tedesco LA. Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:631-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90284-J
  39. Kim IJ, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Effect of surface topography on the color of dental porcelain. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003;14:405-9. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023206716774
  40. Ruyter IE, Nilner K, Moller B. Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers. Dent Mater 1987; 3:246-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80081-7