DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study on the classroom life and the identity of the Elementary Mathematics Gifted Education

초등수학 영재교육원의 교실 생활과 정체성에 대한 사례연구

  • Lee, Hak-Ro (Daegu Dongho Elementary School) ;
  • Ryu, Sung-Rim (Department of Mathematics, Daegu National University of Education)
  • Received : 2010.12.27
  • Accepted : 2011.02.07
  • Published : 2011.02.15

Abstract

For this case study of gifted education, two classrooms in two locations, show life in general of the gifted educational system. And for this case study the identity of teachers and the gifted, help to activate the mathematically gifted education for these research questions, which are as followed: Firstly, how is the gifted education classroom life? Secondly, what kind of identity do the teachers and gifted students bring to mathematics, mathematics teaching and mathematics learning? Being selected in the gifted children's education center solves the research problem of characteristic and approach. Backed by the condition and the permission possibility, 2 selected classes and 2 people, which are coming and going. Gifted education classroom life, the identity of teachers and gifted students in mathematics and mathematics teaching and mathematic learning. It will be for 3 months, with various recordings and vocal instruction between teacher and students. Collected observations and interviews will be analyzed over the course of instruction. The results analyzed include, social participation, structure, and the formation of the gifted education classroom life. The organization of classes were analyzed by the classes conscious levels to collect and retain data. The classes verification levels depended on the program's first class incentive, teaching and learning levels and understanding of gifted math. A performance assessment will be applied after the final lesson and a consultation with parents and students after the final class. The six kinds of social participation structure come out of the type of the most important roles in gifted education accounts, for these types of group discussions and interactions, students must have an interaction or individual activity that students can use, such as a work product through the real materials, which release teachers and other students for that type of questions to evaluate. In order for the development of meaningful mathematical concepts to formulate, mathematical principles require problem solving among all students, which will appear in the resolution or it will be impossible to map the meaning of the instruction from which it was formed. These results show the analysis of the mathematics, mathematics teaching, mathematics learning and about the identity of the teachers and gifted. Gifted education teachers are defined by gifted math, which is more difficult and requires more differentiated learning, suitable for gifted students. Gifted was defined when higher level math was created and challenged students to deeper thinking. Gifted students think that gifted math is creative learning and they are forward or passive to one-way according to the education atmosphere.

본 연구는 영재교육원의 일반적인 교실 생활과 영재교육원의 수업에서 지도교사와 영재학생들의 정체성을 알아보기 위한 목적으로 영재교육원 두 반과 2명의 영재담임강사를 약 3개월에 걸쳐 관찰 및 면접한 결과를 분석한 사례연구이다. 본 연구에서는 영재교육원의 교실 생활에 대해 수업의 조직과 사회적 참여구조, 의미 형성 세 가지 측면으로 나누어 분석하고, 영재교육원 지도교사와 영재학생들의 정체성에 대해 영재수학 및 수학 교수, 학습 측면으로 나누어 분석하여 기술하고 있다. 본 논문을 통해 영재교육원에 입학하고자 하는 학생들과 영재교육원 강사가 되고자 하는 교사에게는 영재교육원 교실 생활에 대한 올바른 가치관을 심어주고, 지도교사에게는 학생들의 영재수학에 대한 정체성과 수학학습에 대한 정체성을 이해하여 어떻게 영재수업을 준비해야할 지에 대한 시사점을 주게 된다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김미숙 (2009). 영재교육 정책 방향과 실천 방안. 청람수학교육 20집. 한국교원대학교 수학교육연구소.
  2. 김영천 (1997). 네 학교 이야기(한국초등학교의 교실 생활과 수업). 서울: 문음사.
  3. 김지원 (2003). 한 수학 영재아의 수학적 사고 특성에 관한 사례연구. 경인교육대학교 교육대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 권점례 (2004). 초등학교 수학교실에서 사회적 관행과 정체성에 대한 연구. 한국교원대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
  5. 조영달 (2001). 한국 중등학교 교실수업의 이해. 서울: 교육과학사.
  6. Creswell, J. W. (1994). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. 조흥식.정선욱.김진숙.권지성 공역(2005). 질적연구방법론; 다섯 가지 전통. 서울: 학지사.
  7. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (2nd), pp. 119-165. NY: Macmillan publishing company.
  8. Johnson, S. K. (2003). Definitions, Models, and Characteristics of Gifted Students. Identifying Gifted Students-a Practical Guide. Prufrock Press, Inc.
  9. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Cited by

  1. 초등 수학 영재교육에서 개별화 수업의 가능성 탐색 vol.14, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2011.14.2.207