Correction of Prominent Alar Lobule by Resecting Dilator Naris Muscles-A Pilot Study

콧구멍 확대근의 절제를 통한 넓은 콧방울의 교정-예비 보고

  • Shin, Soo-Hye (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Hyun (Park Hyun Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery Clinics) ;
  • Han, Seung-Kyu (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Kyung (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 신수혜 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 박현 (박현 성형외과) ;
  • 한승규 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김우경 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.11.16
  • Accepted : 2011.07.13
  • Published : 2011.09.10

Abstract

Purpose: The authors have conducted a series of anatomic studies on the factors affecting shape of a lower vault in Asian noses. The results of the studies showed that prominence of alar lobule is mainly affected by the volumes of the dilator naris anterior and posterior muscles and the insertions of the dilator naris posterior muscles. However, information on its clinical availability is yet insufficient. The present study was undertaken for clinical purpose to find out the effect of dilator naris muscle resection on the correction of prominent alar lobule. Methods: Six patients who were treated by dilator naris muscle resection with a long-term follow-up of more than 1 year were involved in this study. Rhinoplasties were performed via endonasal approaches with resecting dilator naris anterior and posterior muscles by sharp scissor. The effect of the dilator naris muscle resection on alar prominence was investigated by measuring ratio of the short axis to the long axis of a nostril (SA/LA) pre-and postoperatively. The visual analog scale (VAS) was also used to evaluate satisfaction of patients. An average follow-up time was $15.6{\pm}3.7$ months. Results: Having lost the dilating and lateral pulling effects of the dilator naris muscles, the alar lobule shifted medially and alar lobule shapes improved. SA/LA significantly improved (preoperatively $0.71{\pm}0.11$ and postoperatively $0.58{\pm}0.08$; $p$ <0.05). The VAS score was also increased postoperatively (preoperatively $3.2{\pm}1.8$ and postoperatively $8.7{\pm}1.2$; $p$ <0.05). A mild degree of hyperpigmented scar was noted in one alar lobule. Otherwise, there was no case of postoperative complication. Conclusion: Our results suggest that prominent alar lobule could be modified by resecting the attachment of the dilator naris muscles. This maneuver removes the function of dilator naris muscles, then may produce a more aesthetically acceptable alar lobule shape.

Keywords

References

  1. Han SK, Woo HS, Kim WK: Extended incision in open-approach rhinoplasty for asians. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 2087, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200205000-00047
  2. Ducut EG, Han SK, Kim SB, Kim YS, Kim WK: Factors affecting nostril shape in Asian noses. Plast Reconstr Surg 118: 1613, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000242498.43915.93
  3. Matory WE Jr, Falces E: Non-Caucasian rhinoplasty: a 16-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 77: 239, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198602000-00011
  4. Leong SC, White PS: A comparison of aesthetic proportions between the Oriental and Caucasian nose. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 29: 672, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00891.x
  5. Han SK, Ko HW, Kim WK: Advantages of adding a footplate incision in Asian rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 53: 65, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000106427.50863.b3
  6. Chun KW, Kang HJ, Han SK, Lee ES, Chang H, Kim SB, Kim WK: Anatomy of the alar lobule in the Asian nose. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61: 400, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.029
  7. Han SK, Lee DG, Kim JB, Kim WK: An anatomic study of nasal tip supporting structures. Ann Plast Surg 52: 134, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000095439.98488.e6
  8. Oh SH, Kim DA, Jeong JY: Nasal base modification in Asian patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68: 686, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.128
  9. Watanabe K: New ideas to improve the shape of the ala of the Oriental nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg 18: 337, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00451338
  10. Rohrich RJ, Huynh B, Muzaffar AR, Adams WP Jr, Robinson JB Jr: Importance of the depressor septi nasi muscle in rhinoplasty: anatomic study and clinical application. Plast Reconstr Surg 105: 376, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200001000-00059
  11. Letourneau A, Daniel RK: The superficial musculoaponeurotic system of the nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 82: 48, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198882010-00010
  12. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Adams WP: Dallas rhinoplasty: nasal surgery by the masters. 2nd ed, St. Louis, Mo., Quality Medical Pub., 2007, p 32
  13. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Deutsch CK: Objective assessment of standard nostril types-a morphometric study. Ann Plast Surg 11: 381, 1983
  14. Goto M, Katsuki T: Numerical analysis of the human nostril by the Fourier series. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 18: 74, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(05)80202-1
  15. Hwang TS, Kang HS: Morphometry of nasal bases and nostrils in Koreans. Ann Anat 185: 189, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0940-9602(03)80088-2
  16. Aung SC, Foo CL, Lee ST: Three dimensional laser scan assessment of the Oriental nose with a new classification of Oriental nasal types. Br J Plast Surg 53: 109, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3229