Park-Weir Excision for Flaring Alar Correction

넓어진 콧방울의 교정을 위한 Park-Weir 절제술

  • Han, Sung-Bum (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Beyoung-Yun (Institute for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 한승범 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실.인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 박병윤 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실.인체조직복원연구소)
  • Received : 2011.04.04
  • Accepted : 2011.06.27
  • Published : 2011.09.10

Abstract

Purpose: Straight closure line of classic Weir excision leaves visible scars and makes it difficult to precisely approximate resection margins. Hence this study introduces Park-Weir excision that effectively reduces alar width with minimal alar rim scar by 3-dimensional zigzag incision and properly controls the approximation of edges. Methods: From 2008 to 2010, 14 patients underwent Park-Weir excision, crossed wedge excision on alar rim not exceeding 5 mm in width. Each patient was photographed in the same position. Alar width and columellar height against intercanthal distance was compared preoperatively and postoperatively, using image analysis software. Results: Five patients were female and nine were male. Average follow up period was 8 month. Alar width was reduced by 50.50% to 45.96%, original alar width reduced by 8.98% without significant changes in columellar height which was reduced by 0.39%. No visible scar was reported during outpatient follow-up. Conclusion: Park-Weir excision effectively reduces alar width and corrects the flaring of alar without affecting the columellar height. Zigzag incision of Park-Weir excision leaves aesthetically more pleasant scar than straight single incision of classical Weir excision.

Keywords

References

  1. Weir RF: On restoring sunken noses without scarring the face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 12: 203, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01572678
  2. Aufricht DG: A few hints and surgical details in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 317, 1943
  3. Kridel RW, Castellano RD: A simplified approach to alar base reduction: a review of 124 patients over 20 years. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7: 81, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.2.81
  4. Foda HM: Nasal base narrowing: the combined alar base excision technique. Arch Facial Plast Surg 9: 30, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.9.1.30
  5. Warner JP, Chauhan N, Adamson PA: Alar soft-tissue techniques in rhinoplasty: algorithmic approach, quantifiable guidelines, and scar outcomes from a single surgeon experience. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12: 149, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfacial.2010.30
  6. Galdino GM, DaSilva And D, Gunter JP: Digital photography for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 1421, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200204010-00035
  7. Cheon YW, Park BY: Long-term evaluation of elongating columella using conchal composite graft in bilateral secondary cleft lip and nose deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 126: 543, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e0969a
  8. Bennett GH, Lessow A, Song P, Constantinides M: The long-term effects of alar base reduction. Arch Facial Plast Surg 7: 94, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.7.2.94
  9. Ju DM: The physical basis of scar contraction. Plast Reconstr Surg (1946) 7: 343, 1951 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195105000-00001
  10. Borges AF: Zigzag incisions for improved exposure and scarring. Clin Orthop Relat Res Nov-Dec: 202, 1979