Prevention of Cheek Drooping in Intraoral Reduction Malarplasty without Internal Fixation

볼처짐 최소화를 위한 최소절개 및 박리 관골 축소 성형술

  • Park, Dong-Kwon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Jae-Hoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Hyo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul Paik Hospital, Inje University Medical Center) ;
  • You, Young-June (Bone Plastic Surgery Clinics)
  • 박동권 (인제대학교 서울백병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 최재훈 (인제대학교 서울백병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이진효 (인제대학교 서울백병원 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 유영준 (본 성형외과 의원)
  • Received : 2011.08.23
  • Accepted : 2011.10.10
  • Published : 2011.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: In general, orientals including Korean, have a mesocephalic face whereas Caucasians, among the western, have a dolichocephalic face. Unlike the western, in orientals including Korean, prominent malar bones are recognized as stubborn and unattractive appearance. That is why reduction malarplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic surgical procedure in Korea. Many surgical methods to reposition prominent malar bones have been performed by means of a coronal incision or a combined incisions, using both the intraoral and the external incision. Bicoronal approach has advantage such as wide operative field, easy to maintain symmetry and possibility of combining facial lift but has shortcoming, such as external scars, long operative time, and the possibility of facial nerve or artery injury. Intraoral approach has advantages of short operative time, simplicity of procedure and no external scar. But this approach is associated with problems of cheek drooping, limited exposure and difficulty in making symmetry. Methods: During 8 years, we performed a reduction malarplasty without internal fixation through an minimal intraoral incision and dissection in 39 patients. Results: The patients were followed for 46 months, with satisfactory results and no cheek drooping. There was no patient who want to revise the inappropriate operative result such as asymmetry and incomplete correction. Conclusion: We conclude that minimal intraoral incision and dissection could acquire satisfactory result of reduction malarplasty along with prevention of cheek drooping.

Keywords

References

  1. Onizuka T, Watanabe K, Takasu K, Keyama A : Reduction malarplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 7: 121, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01571117
  2. Lee JH, Cho BC: Clinical review of reduction malarplasty using various incision techniques. J Korean Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg 7: 128, 2001
  3. Yang DB, Park CG: Infracture technique for the zygomatic body and arch reduction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 16: 355, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01570700
  4. Baek SM, Chung YD, Kim SS: Reduction malarplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 88: 53, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199107000-00009
  5. Yang DB: Zygomatic reduction using infracture technique through intraoral and short preauricular incision. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 29: 157, 2002
  6. Woo SS, Kim MJ, Min BI: Reduction malarplasty through intraoral approach. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 15: 3, 1993
  7. Choi HY, Lee SW, Lew JM: True intraoral reduction malarplasty with a minimally invasive technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 23: 354, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002669900298
  8. Lee HY, Yang HJ, Cho YN: Minimally invasive zygoma reduction. Plast Reconstr Surg 117: 1972, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000210066.51480.3f