Fashion & Textile Research Journal (한국의류산업학회지)

The Society of Fashion and Textile Industry (한국의류산업학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Study of Symbolic Images in Modern Fashion Design adopting the Dualistic Meanings of Uniform

유니폼의 양면성을 도입한 현대 패션디자인의 상징적 이미지에 대한 연구

  • Kwon, Gi-Young (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Kyungpook National University/Center for Beautiful Aging)
  • 권기영 (경북대학교 의류학과/장수생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2011.07.18
  • Accepted : 2011.08.23
  • Published : 2011.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to analyze the symbolic images appeared in modern fashion design adopted dualistic meanings in uniforms. Uniforms signify order, conformity and discipline in public life. The dualistic meanings in uniforms appeared modern times are as follows: public authority vs individual non-authority, heterosexual identity vs homosexual identity, time-space uniformity vs mixed diversity. The symbolic images appeared in modern fashion design adopted dualistic meanings in uniforms such as military uniforms, school uniforms, nurses' uniforms, sports uniforms and etc. are erotic image, hybrid image, and kitsch image.

Keywords

References

  1. 김상민, 김연희. (2001). 메사 유니폼에 관한 연구. 한국패션디자인학회지, 1(1), 127-145.
  2. 김홍탁. (2002, 5. 9). [광고속의 에로티시즘] 聖과 性의 위험한 만남 '베네통-시베어'. 동아일보. 자료검색일 2009, 12. 12, 자료출처 http://www.donga.com
  3. 김홍탁. (2003). 광고. 리비도를 만나다. 서울: 동아출판사.
  4. 박세은. (2005, 10. 17). [패션] 밀리터리 룩. 한국일보. 자료검색일 2010, 7. 8, 자료출처 http://weekly.hankooki.com
  5. 이의정, 양숙희. (1998). 페티시즘. 서울: 경춘사.
  6. 임은안, 채금석. (2002). 현대스포츠 패션에 관한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 26(9/10), 1308-1319.
  7. 한연희, 박명희. (2005). 유니폼 디자인의 조형성 (제1보). 한국의류학회지, 29(5), 649-661.
  8. Boehn, M. (2000). 패션의 역사 (이재원 역). 서울: 한길아트. (원저 1913 출판)
  9. Craik, J. (2005). Uniform Exposed: From conformity to Transgression. Oxford New York: BERG.
  10. Hilfiger, T. & DeCurtis, A. (1999). Rock Style. NY: UNIVERSE.
  11. Hirschfeld, M. (1991). Transvestites: The erotic drive to cross dress. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
  12. Joseph, N. (1986). Uniforms and Nonuniforms. Communication Through Clothing. New York: Greenwood.
  13. Langner, L. (1965). "Clothes and Government." In Mary Ellen Roach and Joanne Eicher (Eds.), Dress, Adornment, and the Social Order (pp. 124-127). New York and Londen: John Wiley.
  14. Polhemus, T. (1996). Style surfing. London: Thames and Hudson.
  15. Steele, V. (1989) 'Dressing for work' in C. Kidwell and V. Steele (Eds.), Men and Women: Dressing the Part, Washington (pp. 64-91). DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
  16. Stone, G. (1970). "Appearance and the self." In Gregory Stone and Harvey Farberman (Eds.), Social Psychology Through Symbolic Interaction (pp. 394-414). Waltham, MA and London: Ginn-Blaisdell.
  17. Wilson, E. (2008). Exhibition Review: Camouflage and Sailor Chic. Fashion Theory, 12(2), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174108X300247

Cited by

  1. A Study of Effects of Characteristics of Cosmetics Manufacturers' Uniform Design on Perception of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction: Focusing on Women in Their 20s vol.18, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2014.18.4.125
  2. Aesthetic Characteristics of Glocalism in Flight Attendants' Uniform Design vol.17, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.1.42