A Study on Controversial Issues related to Stages of Concern

CBAM의 관심단계에 관한 쟁점 연구

  • Received : 2011.02.07
  • Accepted : 2011.04.10
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to reveal controversial issues on Stages of Concern(SoC), which is one of the dimensions of Concerns Based Adoption Model(CBAM). To achieve the purpose, documental analysis was employed. The theoretical framework to analyze literature consisted of three categories including stages, measurements, and applications. Based on the framework, controversial issues on SoC were discussed regarding arguments of CBAM developers and critics. The researchers of this study suggested their own opinions on the issues after thorough examination of CBAM developer's arguments and oppositions against them. Finally, suggestions for further studies on issues of SoC and studies measuring SoC were made.

Keywords

References

  1. 김민환(2009). 2007년 개정 교육과정에 관한 초등학교 교사의 관심수준 분석, 학습자중심교과교육연구, 9(3), 87-107.
  2. 김분순. 강현석(2010). 학교 교육과정 컨설팅 모형의 시론적 개발, 水産海洋敎育硏究, 22(4), 537-552.
  3. 김석우(2010). 교육평가의 이해. 서울: 학지사.
  4. 김영천 외(2006). After Tyler: 교육과정 이론화 1970년-2000년, 서울: 문음사.
  5. 김은주.양무열.김대현(2010). 2007 개정교육과정 통합교과의 통합단원 실행에 관한 교사들의 관심도 분석, 水産海洋敎育硏究, 22(2), 287-302.
  6. 김재광(1999). 교사의 관심에 기초한 실천적 추론 가정과 수업의 실행 과정에 대한 연구, 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문.
  7. 명전옥.박승재(1995). 대학수학능력시험 도입에 따른 과학적 탐구사고력 평가에 대한 과학 교사들의 관심과 필요 사항, 한국과학교육학회지, 15(4), 417-428.
  8. 서경혜(1992). 교사의 관심에 따른 통합교육과정 실행 형태. 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  9. 이경순(2009). '교육과학기술부 u-러닝 연구학교' 교원의 관심도 분석, 교과교육학연구, 13(4), 820-850.
  10. 이경진.최진영(2007). 교사의 교육과정 실행에 대한 종단적 사례 연구, 교육과정 연구, 25(3), 215-245.
  11. 이현옥.김지영.김학수.김선희(2000). 유치원과 초등학교의 연계성에 대한 교사의 관심도 향상 방안 연구, 韓國教師教育, 17(1), 263-277.
  12. 정홍선(2000). 협동학습에 대한 교사의 관심도 및 활용실태에 관한 연구: 초등사회과를 중심으로, 서울교육대학교 석사학위논문.
  13. 조덕주(2003). 교육과정 운영 지원을 위한 기초로서의 교사의 개인적 관심과 개인적 지식 탐구, 교육과정연구, 21(4), 51-76.
  14. 한승연(1998). 인터넷 수업에 대한 관심유형과 지원책 선정에 관한 연구: 시범 및 실험 가상대학 교수들을 중심으로, 이화여자대학교 석사학위논문.
  15. AL-Rawajfth, K., Fong, S. & Syed, S. (2010). Stages of Concern in Integrating E-Learning in Discovery Schools, Asian Social Science, 6(8), 54-63.
  16. Anderson, S. E. (1991). Principal's Management Style and Patterns of Teacher Implementation across Multiple Innovations, School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(4), 286-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345910020403
  17. Anderson, S. E. (1997). Understanding Teacher Change: Revisiting the Concerns Based Adoption Model, Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 331-367. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00057
  18. Bailey, D. & Palsha, S. (1992). Qualities of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire and Implications for Educational Innovations, Journal of Educational Research, 85(4), 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1992.9941120
  19. Cheung, D., Hattie, J., & Ng, D. (2001). Reexamining the Stages of Concern Questionnaire: A Test of Alternative Models, Journal of Educational Research, 94(4), 225-236.
  20. Christou, C., Eliophotou-Menon, M., & Philippou, G. (2004), Teachers' Concerns Regarding the Adoption of a New Mathematics Curriculum: An Application of CBAM, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 57(2), 157-176.
  21. Crawford, A. R., et al. (1996). Professional development: Supporting the construction of new beliefs and practices through reflective journals, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North Carolina Association for Research in Education, Chapel Hill, NC.
  22. Dass, P. M. (2001). Implementation of Instructional Innovations in K-8 Science Classes: Perspectives of Inservice Teachers, International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 969-984. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010025021
  23. Dobbs, R. L. (2004). Impact of Training on Faculty and Administrators in an Interactive Television Environment, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(3), 183-194.
  24. Domingues, D. & Tunmer, W. E. (1979). Staff Development in Bilingual Schooling, Austin, TX: SEDL.
  25. Evans, M. & Hopkins, D. (1988). School Climate and the Psychological State of the Individual Teacher as Factors Affecting the Utilisation of Educational Ideas Following an Inservice Course, British Educational Research Journal, 14(3), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192880140301
  26. Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation, Review of Educational Research, 50(1), 121-183.
  27. Fuller, F. F. (1969). Concerns of Teachers: A Developmental Conceptualization, American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207, 226. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312006002207
  28. George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring Implementation in Schools: The Stages of Concern Questionnaire, Austin, TX: SEDL.
  29. Hall, G. E. (1978). Implications for planned dissemination, implementation, and evaluation revealed in the SRI/NDN evaluation and Levels of Use of the innovation studies, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Ecucational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  30. Hall, G. E. & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing Change, 2nd Edition, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  31. Hargreaves, L., et al. (2003). How Do Primary School Teachers Define and Implement 'Interactive Teaching' in the National Literacy Strategy in England? Research Papers in Education, 18(3), 217-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152032000107301
  32. Hollingshead, B. (2009). The Concerns-Based Adoption Model: A Framework for Examining Implementation of a Chracter Education Program, Arbara, Nassp Bulletin, 93(3), 166-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636509357932
  33. Holmes, M. (1997). Changing school programs, Curriculum Inquiry, 27(3), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/0362-6784.00054
  34. Hord, S. M., et al. (1987). Taking Charge of Change. Alexandria, VA: Assocation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  35. Kember, D. & Mezger, R. (1990). The Instructional Designer as a Staff Developer: A Course Team Approach Consistent with a Caoncerns-Based Adoption Model, Distance Education, 11(1), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791900110105
  36. Larson, R. (1983). A Study of Curricular and Instructional Change Processes in Rural High Schools, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  37. Loucks, S. F. (1976). An exploration of levels of use of an innovation and the relationship to student achievement, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
  38. Loucks- Horsley, S. & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). Using knowledge of change to guide staff development, In Lieberman, A. & Miller, L.(Eds.), Staff development for education in the '90s. New York: Teachers College Press.
  39. Marsh, C. J. (1987). Implementation of a Social Studies Curriculum in an Australian Elementary School, Elementary School Journal, 87(4), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.1086/461510
  40. Marsh, D. & Penn, D. (1988). Engaging students in innovative instruction: An application of the Stages of Concern framework to studying student engagement, Journal of Classroom Interaction, 23(1), 8-14.
  41. Newhouse, C. P. (2001). Applying the Concerns-Based Adoption Model to Research on Computers in Classrooms, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(5), 1-21.
  42. Osborne, B. (1993). Understanding Change in a time of Change, Paper presented at the annual conference on creating the quality school, Oklahoma City, OK.
  43. Pedron, N. A. & Evans, S. B. (1990). Modifying Classroom Teachers' Acceptance of the Consulting Teacher Model, Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 1(2), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532768xjepc0102_6
  44. Sanders, M. & Ngxola, N. (2009). Addressing Teachers' Concerns about Teaching Evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 43(3), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656166
  45. Shotsberger, P. G. & Crawford, A. R. (1996). An Analysis of the Validity and Reliability of the Concerns Based Adoption Model for Teacher Concerns in Education Reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  46. Snyder, J., Bolin, F., & Zumwalt, K. (1992). Curriculum Implementation. In Jackson, P. W(Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum.
  47. Tunks, J. & Weller, K. (2009). Changing Practice, Changing Minds from Arithmetical to Algebraic Thinking: An Application of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9189-x
  48. Vandenberghe, R. (1983) Studying change in primary and secondary schools in Belgium and the Netherlands. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  49. Yuling, L. & Huang, C. (2005). Concerns of Teachers about Technology Integration in the USA. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760500039928