Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society

The Korean Data and Information Science Society (한국데이터정보과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The change of relative importance in athletes self management test through AHP

계층구조분석을 활용한 운동선수 자기관리 검사지의 상대적 중요도 변화

  • Yu, Kwang-Kil (Sport Science Industry Research Institute, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Chung, Sung-Suk (Department of Statistics, Chonbuk National University)
  • 유광길 (전북대학교 스포츠과학산업연구소) ;
  • 정성석 (전북대학교 통계학과)
  • Received : 2012.08.26
  • Accepted : 2012.10.15
  • Published : 2012.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research was to count and quantify relative importance through analytic hierarchy process on checkups items in order to solve the questions raised by uniformalized numbering in the established athletes self management test. This study has the following results. The relative importance in priority factors of the test is in following order of training management, mental care, body care and interpersonal management. It was also confirmed that relative importance varied according to every checkup item in the lower factors. Consequently, the new result from this study, as an initial research for the relative importance of athletes self management test, supplied the possibility in which the sports-field expert's opinion was reflected. It was expected that this study would be helpful for enhancing athletes' competence in the sports field.

본 연구는 기존 운동선수 자기관리 검사지의 획일화 된 점수 부여 방법에서 발생하는 의문점을 해결하기 위해서 검사 항목에 대한 계층구조 분석을 통해 상대적 중요도를 계산하여 이를 계량화하였다. 이에 대한 결과는 다음과 같다. 운동선수 자기관리 검사지의 상위요인에 대한 상대적 중요도는 훈련관리, 정신관리, 몸 관리, 대인관리의 순으로 평가되었고, 하위요인에서도 상대적 중요도가 모든 검사항목에서 다르게 부여된다는 것을 확인하였다. 결론적으로 본 연구는 운동선수 자기관리 검사 도구의 상대적 중요도를 고려한 초기연구로써 스포츠현장과 전문가의 요구를 반영한 사용가능성도 제시하고 있다. 이를 통해 스포츠현장에서 선수들의 경기력 향상에 작은 단서가 되길 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho, K. T., Cho, Y. G. and Kang, H. S. (2003). The analytical hierarchy process, Donghyunsa, Seoul.
  2. Huh, J. H. and Yoo, J. (2004). The self management strategies of Korean national athletes: Qualitative research. Korean Journal of Sports Psychology, 15, 27-52.
  3. Huh, J. H., Kim, B. J. and Yoo, J. (2001). Korean athletes self-management strategies in practice and competition. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 40, 187-198.
  4. Jones, R. T., Nelson, R. E. and Kazdin, A. E. (1977). The role of external variables in self reinforcement: A review. Behavior Modification, 1, 147-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/014544557712001
  5. Lee, J. T. (2010). A study on the performance pattern in the elite decathlon. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Society, 6, 1071-1079.
  6. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Physiological Review, 13, 27-34.
  7. Orlick, T. and Partington, J. (1988). Mental links to excellence. The Sport Psychologist, 2, 105-130. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2.2.105
  8. Saaty, T. L. (1982). The analytic hierarchy process: A new approach to deal with fuzziness in architecture. Architect Science Review, 25, 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.1982.9696499
  9. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  10. Triantaphyllou, E., Kovalerchuk, B., Mann, L. and Knapp, J. (1997). Determining the most important criteria in maintenance decision making. Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 3, 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552519710161517
  11. Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal Operational Research, 48, 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  12. Yu, K. K. (2010). Analysis on priority of success factors in the provincial sports event through AHP method. Korean Journal of Sport Management, 15, 91-102.