The Korean Journal of Mycology (한국균학회지)

The Korean Society of Mycology (한국균학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biocontrol of Anthracnose of Chili Pepper by Bacillus sp. NAAS-1

Bacillus sp. NAAS-1을 이용한 고추 탄저병 생물학적 방제

  • Yoo, Jae Hong (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Park, In Cheol (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Wan Gyu (Agricultural Microbiology Division, National Academy of Agricultural Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 유재홍 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업미생물과) ;
  • 박인철 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업미생물과) ;
  • 김완규 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농업미생물과)
  • Received : 2012.11.12
  • Accepted : 2012.12.11
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Bacillus sp. NAAS-1 isolated from the field of Chili pepper was tested for biocontrol activity against anthracnose pathogen of Chili pepper caused by Colletotrichum acutatum. The antifungal activity of Bacillus sp. NAAS-1 culture broth was compared with synthetic fungicide containing carbendazim (40%) and kasugamycin (3.45%). Bacillus sp. NAAS-1 showed a similar fungicidal activity against the anthracnose pathogen at the concentration of 50 ${\mu}L/mL$ in comparison to the fungicide containing carbendazim (40%) and kasugamycin (3.45%) using a cup method. Bacillus sp. NAAS-1 also exhibited its potent fungicidal activity against the anthracnose in vivo test at the concentration of 50 ${\mu}L/mL$ when compared to the fungicide containing carbendazim (40%) and kasugamycin (3.45%).

고추포장의 토양에서 분리한 Bacillus sp. NAAS-1 Colletotrichum acutatum에 대한 생물학적 방제 활성을 검정 하였다 이 분리균주를 일종의 작물보호제인 카밴다짐 가스가마이신 수화제와 비교하여 검정한 결과, 기준사용량 농도(50 ${\mu}L/mL$)와 비슷한 항진균 활성을 나타냈다. 또한 생물 검정 결과, 공시 작물보호제의 기준사용량 농도(50 ${\mu}L/mL$)에서 보다 고추 탄저병균의 발병억제효과가 높게 나타나내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buchanan, R. E. and Gibbson N. E. 1974. Bergey,s manual of determinative bacteriology, pp. 529-550. 8th ed. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
  2. Collins, C. H. and Lyne P. M. 1976. Microbiological methods. pp. 169-180. Butterworths, London.
  3. Gutterson, N. 1990. Microbial fungicides: recent approaches to elucidating mechanisms. Critical reviews in biotechnology 10:69-91. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559009038205
  4. Kang, B. K., Min, J. Y., Kim, Y. S., Park, S. W., Bach, N. V. and Kim, H. T. 2005. Semi-selective medium for monitoring Colletotrichum acutatum causing pepper anthracnose in the field. Research in Plant Disease 11:21-27. https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2005.11.1.021
  5. Kim, H. S., Park, J., Choi, S. W., Choi, K. H., Lee, G. P., Ban, S. J., Lee, C. H. and Kim, C. S. 2003. Isolation and characterization of Bacillus strains for biological control. Journal of microbiology 41:196-201.
  6. Kim, K. D., Oh, B. J. and Yang, J. 1999. Differential interactions of a Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolate with green and red pepper fruits. Phytoparasitica 27:97-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03015074
  7. Klich, M. A., Arthur, K. S., Lax, A. R., and Bland, J. M. 1994. Iturin A: A potential new fungicide for stored grains. Mycopathologia 127:123-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103068
  8. Korsten, L. and De Jager, E. S. 1995. Mode of action of Bacillus subtilis for control of avocado postharvest pathogens. South Africa Avocado Grower's Association Yearbook. 18:124-130.
  9. Lim, T. H., and Choi, Y. H. 2006. Response of several fungicides of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides isolates obtained from persimmons in Sangju. Research in Plant Disease 12:99-102. https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2006.12.2.099
  10. Park, H. G. 2001. Breeding of anthracnose-resistant lines by interspecific hybridization in chile pepper (Capsicum spp.). Research in Agriculture and Life Science. 5:40-42.
  11. Park, K. S. and Kim, C. H. 1992. Identification, distribution and etiological characterization of anthracnose fungi of red pepper in Korea. Korean Journal of Plant Pathology 8:61-69.
  12. Park, K. S., Kim J. C., Choi, S. Y., Park, S. D. and Lee, S. G. 2004. Plant diseases of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius) and their chemical control. Research in Plant Disease 10:159-166. https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2004.10.3.159
  13. Shin, H. J., Chen, Z. J., Hwang, J. M. and Lee, S. G. 1999. Comparison of pepper anthracnose pathogens from Korea and China. The plant pathology journal 15:323-329.
  14. Sneath, P. H. A., N. S. Mair, M. E. Sharpe and J. G. Holt. Bergey,s manual of systematic bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

Cited by

  1. Antagonistic Activities of Bacillus spp. Strains Isolated from Tidal Flat Sediment Towards Anthracnose Pathogens Colletotrichum acutatum and C. gloeosporioides in South Korea vol.31, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.03.2015.0036
  2. Development of Biofungicide Using Bacillus sp. KBC1004 for the Control of Anthracnose of Red Pepper vol.21, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2015.21.3.208
  3. Biological Control of Fusarium Stalk Rot of Maize Using Bacillus spp. vol.21, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2015.21.4.280
  4. Selection of Antifungal Bacteria Burkholderia lata CAB13001 for Control on Red Pepper Anthracnose and Its Control Efficacy in Field vol.26, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2018.26.4.649