The Effect of Veneering Techniques on the Color Parameters of Y-TZP Based All Ceramic Restoration of Varying Ceramic Core Thickness

지르코니아 코어 두께에 따른 전부도재관의 상부도재 축성방법이 보철물 색조에 미치는 영향

  • Huh, Sung-Yoon (Department of Dental Hygiene, Shingu college) ;
  • Son, Ho-Jung (Medi-ocean) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Hong (Department of Health Science Specialized in Dental Lab. Science & Engineering, Graduate School, Korea University)
  • 허성윤 (신구대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 손호정 ((주)메디오션) ;
  • 김혜영 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공) ;
  • 김재홍 (고려대학교 대학원 보건과학과 치의기공전공)
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

The aim of study was to compare the color parameters and mean color difference of porcelain specimens by different veneering technique in order to examine the effect of veneering technique on esthetics of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline(Y-TZP) all ceramic restoration. Three groups of square-shaped core ceramic specimens(14mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 mm) and two groups of veneering ceramic specimen were prepared for analysis. Color parameter($L^*,a^*,b^*$) and color difference of zirconia core squares and core-veneer specimens were measured with ShadeEye $NCC^{(R)}$ spectrophotometer, respectively. Mean color difference(${\Delta}E^*$)were calculated using color difference formula. Two-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) combined with a Tukey multiple-range test were used to analysis the data(${\alpha}=0.05$). ${\Delta}E^*$ values were not significantly affected by core thickness and veneering porcelain(p=0.083). The color differences(${\Delta}E^*$) of core-veneer specimens with 0.5, 0.7 mm-A1,A2,A3.5 shade were mostly below 3.7 which was within the clinically acceptable range, while color differences between 0.3 mm-A1,A2 showed more than 3.7. All-ceramic system has color characteristics that clinicians have to consider when selecting materials. Also, manufacturers of different porcelain systems must make every effort to achieve color reproducibility.

이 연구에서는 지르코니아 코어의 두께를 달리 제작하여 동일한 색조의 상부도재를 축성함에 있어 제작방법을 다르게 하여 두 상반된 시편을 각각 분광측색장치를 이용하여 CIE $L^*,a^*,b^*$ 색체계로 산출하여 객관적으로 색차를 비교, 분석하여 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 지르코니아 코어의 두께가 두꺼워 지고 상부도재의 두께가 얇아지면서 $L^*$ 값의 수치는 높아지며 $a^*,b^*$ 값은 낮아지는 경향을 띠었다. 상부도재 축성방법을 다르게 제작한 시편에서도 같은 결과를 보였다. 동일한 색조 시편에서 HP군은 PST군에 비해 $L^*$ 값의 수치는 낮게 측색되어 어두운 경향을 보였으며 $a^*,b^*$ 값도 낮은 수치를 보여 황색의 경향을 띠었다. 2. HP군, PST군 모두 동일한 색조에서 지르코니아 코어 두께와 상부도재 제작방법 간에 교호작용은 없었다(P=.083). 지르코니아 코어의 두께에 따라서는 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 존재하였으며(P=.001), 두께가 0.3 mm의 시편 A1, A2 색조에서 색차 값($E^*$)은 3.7 이상으로 나타났고, 그 이외 시편에서는 3.7 이하로 분석되어 임상가능 허용치로 나타났다. 이상의 결과로 볼 때 지르코니아를 이용한 전부 도재관 제작 시 같은 색조의 재료 일지라도 제작방식과 상부도재의 재료에 따라 색차 값이 존재하므로 이를 감안하여 보철물 제작에 사용해야 할 것으로 사료되며, 특히 코어의 두께가 얇은 보철물에서는 임상 허용치 이상의 색차 값을 보이므로 코어의 두께를 좀 더 추가하여 설계한 보철물이 바람직하다고 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Preston JD: Current status of shade selection and color matching. Quintessence Int 16(1): 47-58, 1985.
  2. Alma Dozic et al.: The influence of porcelain layer thickness on the final shade of ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 90(1): 563-70, 2003.
  3. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O'Brien WJ: Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 56(3): 35-40, 1986.
  4. O'Brien WJ et al.: Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. Dent Mater 7(4): 170-173, 1991.
  5. Garber DA, Goldstein RE: The quest for all ceramic restoration. Quintessense Dent Tech 25(6): 13-19, 2000.
  6. Guazzato M et al.: Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of all-ceramic materials. Part II: zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 20(1): 449-456, 2004.
  7. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Daronch M: Influence of time and adhesive system on the extrusion shear strength between feldspathic porcelain and bovine dentin. Dent Mater 16(2): 303-310, 2000.
  8. Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ: Effect of zirconia type on its bond strength with different veneer ceramics. J Prosthodont 17(1): 401-408, 2008.
  9. Hochman N, Zalkind M: New all ceramic indirect post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 18(1): 625-629, 1999.
  10. Douglas RD, Przybylska M: Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. J Prosthet Dent 82(3): 143-149, 1999.
  11. Heffernan MJ et al.: Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 88(4): 4-9, 2003.
  12. O' Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM: A new, small-color-difference equation for dental shade. J Dent Res 69(2): 1762-1764, 1990.
  13. Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG: Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 97(3): 200-208, 2007.
  14. Preston JD: Current status of shade selection and color matching. Quint Int 16(1): 47-58, 1985.
  15. Clark EB: An analysis of tooth color. J Am Dent Assoc 18(6): 2093-2103, 1931.
  16. Chu SJ, Tarnow DP: Digital shade analysis and verification. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 13(2): 129-136, 2001.
  17. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD: Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 75(1): 18-32, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90413-8
  18. Knispel G: Factors affecting the process of color matching restorative materials to nature teeth. Quintessence Int 22(1): 525-531, 1991.
  19. Sorensen JA et al.: Status of clinical trial on empress crown. J Dent Res 74(1): 159-168, 1995.
  20. Tidehag P, Gunne J: A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlay. Int J Prosthodont 8(2): 456-460, 1995.
  21. Xiao Ping Luo, Lei Zhang: Effect of veneering techniques on color and translucency of Y-TZP. J Prosthodont 19(6): 465-470, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00610.x
  22. Lee YK, Cha HS, Ahn JS: Layered color of all-ceramic core and veneer ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 97(5): 279-286, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.03.010