A Study on the Correlation between Static, Dynamic Standing Balance Symmetry and Walking Function in Stroke

뇌졸중 환자의 정적, 동적 선자세 균형 대칭성과 보행 기능의 상관관계 연구

  • Kim, Joong-Hwi (Department of Physical Therapy, Collage of Medical Science, Catholic University of Daegu)
  • 김중휘 (대구가톨릭대학교 의료과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.03.16
  • Accepted : 2012.04.09
  • Published : 2012.04.25

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to measure the standing balance symmetry of stroke patients using a force-plate with computer system, and to investigate the correlation between the standing balance symmetry and that of the walking function in stroke patients. Methods: 48 patients with stroke (34 men, 14 women, $56.8{\pm}11.72$ years old) participated in this study. Static standing balance was evaluated by the weight distribution on the affected and the nonaffected lower limbs, sway path, sway velocity, and sway frequency, which reflected the characteristic of body sway in quiet standing. Dynamic standing balance was evaluated by anteroposterior and mediolateral sway angle, which revealed the limit of stability during voluntary weight displacement. Symmetry index of static standing balance, (SI-SSB) calculated by the ratio of the affected weight distribution for the nonaffected weight distribution, and symmetric index of dynamic standing balance (SI-SDB) by the ratio of the affected sway angle for the nonaffected sway angle. Functional balance assessed by a Berg balance scale (BBS), and the functional walking by 10m walking velocity, as well as the modified motor assessment scale (mMAS). Results: Static balance scales and SI-SSB was the only correlation with BBS (p<0.05). Dynamic balance scales and SI-DSB, not only was correlated with BBS, but also with 10m walking velocity and mMAS (p<0.01). Additionally, there was a significant difference between SI-SSB and that of SI-DSB (p<0.01). Conclusion: The balance and the walking function relate to real life in the stroke showed strong relationships with the dynamic standing balance symmetry in the frontal plane and the ability of anterior voluntary weight displacement in sagittal plane.

Keywords

References

  1. Hochstenbach J, Donders R, Mulder T et al. Long-term outcome after stroke: a disability-orientated approach. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 1996;19(3):189-200. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-199609000-00001
  2. Nichols DS. Balance retraining after stroke using force platform biofeedback. Phys Ther. 1997;77(5):553-8.
  3. Nardone A, Godi M, Artuso A et al. Balance rehabilitation by moving platform and exercises in patients with neuropathy or vestibular deficit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1869-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.011
  4. Yu E, Abe M, Masani K et al. Evaluation of postural control in quiet standing using center of mass acceleration: comparison among the young, the elderly, and people with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(6):1133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.047
  5. Mansfield A, Danells CJ, Inness E et al. Between-limb synchronization for control of standing balance in individuals with stroke. Clin Biomech. 2011;26(3):312-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.10.001
  6. Januario F, Campos I, Amaral C. Rehabilitation of postural stability in ataxic/hemiplegic patients after stroke. Disability & Rehabilitation. 2010;32(21):1775-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638281003734433
  7. Srivastava A, Taly AB, Gupta A et al. Post-stroke balance training: role of force platform with visual feedback technique. J Neurol Sci. 2009;287(1-2):89-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.051
  8. Carver T, Nadeau S, Leroux A. Relation between physical exertion and postural stability in hemiparetic participants secondary to stroke. Gait Posture. 2011;33(4):615-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.02.001
  9. Sackley CM. The relationships between weight-bearing asymmetry after stroke, motor function and activities of daily living. Physiotherapy theory and Practice. 1990;6(4):179-85. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593989009048293
  10. Rode G, Tiliket C, Boisson D. Predominance of postural imbalance in left hemiparetic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1997;29(1):11-6.
  11. Manor B, Hu K, Zhao P et al. Altered control of postural sway following cerebral infarction: a cross-sectional analysis. Neurology. 2010;74(6):458-64. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181cef647
  12. Nardone A, Godi M, Grasso M et al. Stabilometry is a predictor of gait performance in chronic hemiparetic stroke patients. Gait Posture. 2009;30(1):5-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.006
  13. Caldwell C, Macdonald D, Macneil K et al. Symmetry of weight distribution in normals and stroke patients using digital weigh scales. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. 1986;2(3):109-16. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593988609022429
  14. Dickstein R, Dvir Z, Ben Jehosua E et al. Automatic and voluntary lateral weight shifts in rehabilitation of hemiparetic patients. Clin Rehabil. 1994;8(2):91-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/026921559400800201
  15. Lee WA, Deming L, Sahgal V. Quantitative and clinical measures of static standing balance in hemiparetic and normal subjects. Phys Ther. 1988;68(6):970-6.
  16. de Oliveira CB, De Medeiros I, Frota N et al. Balance control in hemiparetic stroke patients: Main tools for evaluation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(8):1215-26. https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2007.09.0150
  17. Ikai T, Kamikubo T, Takehara I et al. Dynamic postural control in patients with hemiparesis. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2003;82(6):463-9.
  18. Mansfield A, Danells CJ, Inness E et al. Between-limb synchronization for control of standing balance in individuals with stroke. Clin Biomech. 2011;26(3):312-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.10.001
  19. Ibuki A, Bach T, Rogers D et al. The effect of tone-reducing orthotic devices on soleus muscle reflex excitability while standing in patients with spasticity following stroke. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34(1):46-57. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093640903476802
  20. Di Fabio RP, Badke MB. Influence of cerebrovascular accident on elongated and passively shortened muscle responses after forward sway. Phys Ther. 1988;68(8):1215-20.
  21. Cheng JS, Yang YR, Cheng SJ et al. Effects of combining electric stimulation with active ankle dorsiflexion while standing on a rocker board: A pilot study for subjects with spastic foot after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(4):505-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.022
  22. Chern JS, Lo CY, Wu CY et al. Dynamic postural control during trunk bending and reaching in healthy adults and stroke patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2010;89(3):186-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c56287
  23. Garland SJ, Stevenson TJ, Ivanova T. Postural responses to unilateral arm perturbation in young, elderly, and hemiplegic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(10):1072-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90130-1
  24. Sackley C, Baguley B. Visual feedback after stroke with the balance performance monitor: two single-case studies. Clin Rehabil. 1993;7(3):189-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/026921559300700302
  25. Lee DJ, Kim SY, Song CH. The Correlations between the balance test, functional movement, visual perception test and functional independent measure in stroke patients. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2009;21(2);39-45.
  26. Smith PS, Hembree JA, Thompson ME. Berg balance scale and functional reach: determining the best clinical tool for individuals post acute stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(7):811-8. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215504cr817oa
  27. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2001;15(4):415-21. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921501678310216
  28. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke. 1990;21(1):78-81. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.21.1.78
  29. Kim JH, Kim CS. Effects of plastic AFO and shoes on static standing balance in hemiplegic patients. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2001;13(2):381-97.
  30. Kim JH, Kim CS. Effects of virtual reality program on standing balance in chronic stroke patients. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2005;17(3):351-67.
  31. Bohannon RW, Larkin PA. Lower extremity weight bearing under various standing conditions in independently ambulatory patients with hemiparesis. Phys Ther. 1985;65(9):1323-5.
  32. Geurts AC, de Haart M, van Nes IJ et al. A review of standing balance recovery from stroke. Gait Posture. 2005;22(3):267-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.10.002
  33. Cameron D, Bohannon RW, Garrett GE et al. Physical impairments related to kinetic energy during sit-to-stand and curb-climbing following stroke. Clin Biomech. 2003;18(4):332-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00023-8
  34. Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A et al. Predictors of handicap situations following post-stroke rehabilitation. Disability & Rehabilitation. 2002;24(15):774-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280210125814
  35. Forster A, Young J. Incidence and consequences offalls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry. BMJ. 1995;311(6997):83-6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.6997.83
  36. Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Patient falls in stroke rehabilitation: a challenge to rehabilitation strategies. Stroke. 1995;26(5):838-42. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.5.838
  37. Robinson CA, Shumway-Cook A, Ciol MA et al. Participation in community walking following stroke: subjective versus objective measures and the impact of personal factors. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1865-76. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100216
  38. Pollock C, Eng J, Garland S. Clinical measurement of walking balance in people post stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2011;25(8):693-708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510397394
  39. Kim HW, Kim SM, Park RJ. The effects of task-oriented functional training on standing balance in stroke patients. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2003;15(4):923-36.
  40. Di Fabio RP, Badke MB, McEvoy A et al. Kinematic properties of voluntary postural sway in patients with unilateral primary hemispheric lesions. Brain Res. 1990;513(2):248-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90463-L