대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제42권1호
  • /
  • Pages.23-31
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference?

  • Kamak, Hasan (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University) ;
  • Celikoglu, Mevlut (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.08
  • 심사 : 2011.07.15
  • 발행 : 2012.02.29
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the soft tissue thickness of male and female orthodontic patients with different skeletal malocclusions. Methods: Soft tissue thickness measurements were made on lateral cephalometric radiographs of 180 healthy orthodontic patients with different skeletal malocclusions (Class I: 60 subjects, Class II: 60 subjects, Class III: 60 subjects). Ten measurements were analyzed. For statistical evaluation, one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed. Least significant difference (LSD) and Dunnet T3 post hoc tests were used to determine the individual differences. Results: Soft tissue thicknesses were found to be greater for men than for women. Statistically significant differences among the skeletal groups were found in both men and women at the following sites: labrale superius, stomion, and labrale inferius. The thickness at the labrale superius and stomion points in each skeletal type was the greatest in Class III for both men and women. On the other hand, at the labrale inferius point, for both men and women, soft tissue depth was the least in Class III and the greatest in Class II. Conclusions: Soft tissue thickness differences among skeletal malocclusions were observed at the labrale superius, stomion, and labrale inferius sites for both men and women.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning--Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:395-411.
  2. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:299-312.
  3. Miyajima K, McNamara JA Jr, Kimura T, Murata S, Iizuka T. Craniofacial structure of Japanese and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:431-8.
  4. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002;72:72-80.
  5. Bacon W, Girardin P, Turlot JC. A comparison of cephalometric norms for the African Bantu and a caucasoid population. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:233-40.
  6. Cooke MS, Wei SH. Cephalometric standards for the Southern Chinese. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:264-72.
  7. Nanda R, Nanda RS. Cephalometric study of the dentofacial complex of North Indians. Angle Orthod 1969;39:22-8.
  8. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Determination of Holdaway soft tissue norms in Anatolian Turkish adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123: 395-400.
  9. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Yoshino M, Miyazawa H, Inoue K. Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese children. Forensic Sci Int 2010;199:109.e1-6.
  10. Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Yoshino M, Oohigashi S, Miyazawa H, et al. Pilot study of fa cial soft tissue thickness differences among three ske le tal classes in Japanese females. Forensic Sci Int 2010;195:165.e1-5.
  11. Erbay EF, Caniklioglu CM. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part II. Comparison of different soft tissue analyses in the evaluation of beauty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:65-72.
  12. Erbay EF, Caniklioglu CM, Erbay SK. Soft tissue profile in Anatolian Turkish adults: Part I. Evaluation of horizontal lip position using different soft tis sue analyses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:57-64.
  13. Gazilerli U. The Steiner norms between 13-16 years old Turkish children with the normal occlusion on the region of Ankara (master thesis). Turkey: Ankara University, 1976.
  14. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84:1-28.
  15. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod 1984;85:279-93.
  16. Celikoglu M, Kazanci F, Miloglu O, Oztek O, Kamak H, Ceylan I. Frequency and characteristics of tooth agenesis among an orthodontic patient population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e797-801.
  17. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.
  18. Arnett GW, Gunson MJ. Facial planning for orthodontists and oral surgeons. Am J Orthod Dento facial Orthop 2004;126:290-5.
  19. Uysal T, Yagci A, Basciftci FA, Sisman Y. Standards of soft tissue Arnett analysis for surgical planning in Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:449-56.
  20. Kalha AS, Latif A, Govardhan SN. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in a South Indian ethnic popu lation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133: 876-81.
  21. Hamdan AM. Soft tissue morphology of Jordanian adolescents. Angle Orthod 2010;80:80-5.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of the Activator and Twin Block on Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Class II Division 1 Patients vol.27, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.13076/tjo-d-14-00020
  2. Comparison of the effects of facemask treatment started simultaneously and after the completion of the alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction procedure vol.85, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2319/031114-176.1
  3. Assessment of the soft tissue thickness at the lower anterior face in adult patients with different skeletal vertical patterns using cone-beam computed tomography vol.85, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2319/040114-237.1
  4. Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: A new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion vol.85, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2319/051314-345.1
  5. Evaluation of mandibular transverse widths in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate using cone beam computed tomography vol.85, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2319/061614-438.1
  6. Evaluation of the mandibular volume and correlating variables in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate: a cone-beam computed tomography study vol.20, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1651-9
  7. Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study vol.86, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2319/040315-225.1
  8. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography vol.17, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1886
  9. Assessment of the soft tissue chins thickness with different skeletal vertical patterns in Pakistani adults vol.10, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5897/jdoh2016.0192
  10. Modifications of Midfacial Soft-Tissue Thickness Among Different Skeletal Classes in Italian Children vol.10, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874347101810010001
  11. Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Individuals having Skeletal Class II Malocclusion vol.11, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1724
  12. Comparative evaluation of perioral soft tissue of skeletal normal Class I and Class II Division 1 subjects: A lateral cephalometric study vol.11, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijor.ijor_43_19
  13. Comparison of three-dimensional soft-tissue evaluations between skeletal and pseudo-class III malocclusions vol.10, pp.None, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71772-7