DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Youth Center Programs Based on the Domains for Creative Activity

창의적 체험활동 영역별 경남지역 청소년 수련시설 프로그램의 분석

  • Received : 2012.07.05
  • Accepted : 2012.07.29
  • Published : 2012.08.31

Abstract

This study analyzed the programs offered in the youth center located in Gyeongsangnam-do Province in accordance with the domains for creative activity. The creative activity, introduced through the 2009 revised national curriculum, puts an emphasis on the experiential activities to enhance the creativity of students. The creativity activity needs to be operated as intended in order to ensure that the students can grow into adults, who have creativity and good personality, by amassing a variety of experiences. For that, various human resources and physical resources of communities need to be utilized efficiently. Thus, this study explored the measures to achieve the original objectives of creativity activity by analyzing the programs - offered by the youth centers in Gyeongsangnam-do Province - based on the scope of creativity activity. The followings are the results of the analysis of 177 programs offered in 12 organizations that came under the three categories (training facilities operated directly by the Education Office, public training centers, culture center) of the youth centers located in Gyeongsangnam-do Province. Autonomous activity' comprised the highest proportion in the youth center programs of the three categories, followed by club activity. The programs associated with the 'career activity' - which most students have the highest expectations in relation to the creativity activity - comprised relatively low proportion. In conclusion, the programs offered by the youth centers in communities need to become more diversified in order to achieve the intended results of creative activity. In addition, the programs associated with the 'career activity', which student prefer the most, need to be operated in a more diversified manner with greater emphasis. Furthermore, the measures should be explored which may increase the involvement of youth education experts of community in the operations of creativity activity.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부(2009). 창의적 체험활동. 교육과학기술부 고시 제 2009-41호. 별책 18호.
  2. 교육과학기술부(2010). 초.중.고 창의적 체험활동 교육과정 해설.
  3. 김현철.최창욱.민경석(2010). 초.중고 창의적 체험활동과 청소년활동정책의 연계방안 연구. 한국청소년정책연구원 연구보고 10-R08.
  4. 김호숙(2010). 체험중심 교육으로 즐거운 학교를 한국직업능력개발원. 창의성 교육의 실효성 제고방안(1)-왜 창의 인재인가. 직업능력개발원 진로정보센터 제 1차 미래교육공동체포럼 자료집. 5-13.
  5. 박순경.이양락.이광우.김평국.이미숙.정영근.이희영(2004). 제7차 교육과정의 쟁점 분석 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRC 2004-3.
  6. 박옥식.지은경(2010). 서울시립 청소년수련시설프로그램 분석 -창의적 체험활동 교육과정 기준을 중심으로-. 청소년학연구. 17(9), 1-25.
  7. 이광우 외(2010). 2009 개정교육과정에 따른 학교급별 창의적 체험활동 모형 개발 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고 RRC 2010-11.
  8. 이득규(2006). 서울시립청소년수련시설의 이용률제고를 위한 정책집행사례 연구. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문.
  9. 이민희 외(2005). 청소년정책과 학교교육정책의 연계.협력방안 연구: 청소년활동의 연계.협력을 중심으로. 서울: 한국청소년개발원.
  10. 조남억(2010). 창의적 체험활동과 청소년단체활동의 연계에 관한 연구. 청소년학연구. 17(9), 83-104.
  11. 조혜영.유진이(2008). 청소년의 지역사회 청소년 시설 이용실태와 주체적 참여방안 연구: 청소년문화의집을 중심으로. 한국청소년정책연구원.
  12. Barrett, J., & Green, R.(1995). Why adventure? The role of outdoor adventure in young people's personal and social development. Foundation for Outdoor Adventure re:Coventry, UK.
  13. Burkhadts, M.(2005). Directions youth development outcomes of the camp experience. American Camping Association.
  14. Scales, P., & Leffert, N.(1996). Development assets: A synthesis of the scientific research on adolescent development. Minneapolis. MN:Search Institute.
  15. 거제 청소년 문화의집 http://gmdc.or.kr
  16. 거창청소년문화의집 http://www.ymcajjang.or.kr
  17. 경남학생교육원 www.knedu.or.kr
  18. 김해 청소년 문화의집 http://ghyouth.or.kr
  19. 낙동강수련원 www.nakdongstc.or.kr
  20. 남해학생야영수련원 http://www.nhcamp.or.kr
  21. 덕유교육원 http://www.dukyoou.or.kr
  22. 밀양시 청소년수련관 www.miryouth.net
  23. 양산시청소년수련관 http://www.dulsori.com
  24. 진주시 청소년수련관 http://youth.jinju.go.kr
  25. 창원 청소년 문화의집 http://www.youthup.net.
  26. 창원시청소년수련관 http://youth.changwon.go.kr

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Status and Promotion of Youth Activities - Jeollanam-do around the training institutions - vol.28, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2016.28.3.769