The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Implant fixed prosthetic treatment using CAD/CAM system in a patient with severe alveolar resorption

임상가를 위한 특집 3 - 심하게 흡수된 치조제를 가진 환자에서 CAD/CAM을 이용한 임플란트 고정성 보철치료

  • Choi, Yu-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 최유성 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과 보철학 교실)
  • Received : 2012.02.17
  • Accepted : 2012.02.24
  • Published : 2012.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Loss of dentition can lead to not only compromised esthetics and functions of the patient, but also alveolar bone resorption. Bone grafting with prosthetic reconstruction of the gingiva can be selected for the treatment, and it provides many benefits as prosthetic gingival reconstruction does not require a complicated surgical process and is available within a short period of time, with stable clinical results. However, conventional porcelain fused to metal prosthesis has certain limits due to its size, and deformation after several firing procedures. In this clinical report, the author would like to introduce a patient with severe alveolar resorption who was treated with gingiva-shaped zirconia/titanium CAD/CAM implant fixed prosthesis for esthetic and functional rehabilitation. Clinical reports Clinical report 1, 2 : A case of loss of anterior dentition with atrophied alveolar bone. Implant retained zirconia bridge applied with Procera implant bridge system to simulate the gingiva. Upper structure was fabricated with zirconia all ceramic crown. Clinical report 3, 4 : A case of atrophied maxillary alveolus was reconstructed with fixed implant prosthesis, a CAD/CAM designed titanium structure covered wi th resin on its surface. Anterior dentition was reconstructed with zirconia crown. Conclusion and clinical uses. All patients were satisfied with the outcome, and maintained good oral hygiene. Zirconia/titanium implant fixed prosthesis fabricated by CAD/CAM system was highly accurate and showed adequate histological response. No critical failure was seen on the implant fixture and abutment overall. Sites of severe alveolar bone loss can be rehabilitated by implant fixed prosthesis with CAD/CAM system. This type of prosthesis can offer artificial gingival structure and can give more satisfying esthetics and functions, and as a result the patients were able to accept the outcome more fondly, which makes us less than hard to think that it can be a more convenient treatment for the practitioners.

Keywords

References

  1. Kopp KC et al. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:611-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00198-7
  2. Minoretti R et al. Predetermined implant positioning by means of a novel guide template technique.Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:266-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003266.x
  3. Taylor TD, Agar JR. Twenty years of progress in implant prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:89-95. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.126818
  4. Lekholm U. Surgical considerations and possible shortcomings of host sites. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70192-1
  5. tStrietzel FP. Patient's informed consent prior toimplant-prosthetic treatment: a retrospective analysis of expert opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:433-9.
  6. Kapos T et al. Computer-aided design and computer-assisted manufacturing in prosthetic implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(suppl):110-7.
  7. Hebel KS & Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achievingoptimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70203-8
  8. Henriksson K & Jemt T. Evaluation of custom made Procera ceramic abutments for single-implant tooth replacement: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:626-30.
  9. Salenbauch NM & Langner J. New ways of designing suprastructures for fixed implant-supported prostheses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:604-12.
  10. Jemt T. Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and frame-work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures: A pilot study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:272-80. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090408.x
  11. Priest G. Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63(9 Suppl 2):22-32.
  12. Raigrodski A J, Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review of the literature J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:557-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.015
  13. Christensen GJ. Porcelain-fused-to-metal versus zirconia-based ceramic restorations, 2009 J AmDent Assoc. 2009 Aug;140(8):1036-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0316
  14. Cavalcanti AN et al. Y-TZP ceramics: key concepts for clinical application. Oper Dent. 2009;34:344-51. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-79
  15. Chang PP et al. Maxillary zirconia implant fixed partial dentures opposing an acrylic resin implant fixed complete denture : A two year clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:321-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60020-1