한국건축시공학회지 (Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction)

  • 제13권6호
  • /
  • Pages.530-540
  • /
  • 2013
  • /
  • 1598-2033(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-5706(eISSN)
한국건축시공학회 (The Korean Institute of Building Construction)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대형건설기업의 경영성과 측정을 위한 전략사업본부 비중분석

A Weight Analysis for Measuring the Management Performance of Strategic Business Units of Large Construction Companies

  • Lee, Dong-Hoon (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung-Hee University) ;
  • Park, Hye-Sung (Design Standard Team, Incheon Development & Tourism Corporation) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Chul (Hyundai Engineering and construction) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Kuk (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung-Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2013.05.21
  • 심사 : 2013.10.15
  • 발행 : 2013.12.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

경영성과에 영향을 주는 경영환경은 플랜트의 호황에 의한 해외 수주 증가와 국내 주택시장의 침체 등 전략사업부(SBU: strategic business unit)별 명암이 뚜렷하다. 이러한 환경변화는 경영성과 측정 시 전략사업부의 전략적 중요도를 변화시킨다. 그러나 대형건설기업의 경영성과는 전략사업부별 경영성과를 BSC(Balanced Score Card)를 적용하여 일괄 합산하기 때문에 이러한 전략적 중요도의 반영이 어렵다. 이러한 방식은 환경변화를 반영하지 못한 왜곡된 경영성과를 도출할 수 있기 때문에 개선이 필요하다. 그러나 환경변화를 반영한 전략사업부별 비중에 대한 연구가 전무한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구는 대형건설기업의 전사적 경영성과 측정을 위한 전략사업본부 비중분석을 목적으로 한다. 또한 전략사업본부 비중분석 모델을 제시하여 끊임없는 환경변화에 대응하여 비중을 수정 적용하는 방법을 제시하였다. 비중 분석을 위해 23명의 경영전문가와 실무자에게 설문을 실시하였으며 FD-AHP기법을 적용하여 결과를 정량화하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 전사적 경영성과 측정 시 전략적 왜곡을 최소화하며 환경변화를 반영한 분야별 비중산출을 위한 모델이 될 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.

The business environment that affects the management performance can be characterized by each Strategic Business Unit (SBU) since construction companies win overseas contracts due to the fairly good construction situations while experience a decline in the local housing market. Environmental changes can alter the strategic importance of the SBU when measuring the management performance. However, large construction companies apply BSC (Balanced Score Card) for collective calculation to determine the management performance, making it difficult to reflect the strategic importance of SBU. This method may create a distorted image of management performance that fails to take environmental changes into consideration, and as such it needs to be improved. Yet, there are no studies on the weight of each SBU considering environmental changes. Thus, the current study intends to analyze the weight of SBU for company-wide measurement of the performance of large construction companies. In addition, a model for analysis of SBU importance is proposed to respond to the constantly changing environmental situations and to modify the weight. For analysis of SBU weight, a questionnaire was conducted with 23 experts and hands-on workers, and the questionnaire result was quantitatively analyzed by applying the FD-AHP method. It is expected that the result will enable a model to be proposed to calculate the weight per division in a manner that reflects environmental changes and minimizes strategic distortion when measuring the management performance of large construction companies.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim JC. A Study of the Management Performance Assessment Model of Global Construction Firms(MAP-GC) [dissertation]. [Su-Won (Korea)]: Kyung Hee University; 2013. 170 p.
  2. Yearly Order Status [Internet]. Seoul: International Contractors Association of Korea. 1964- [cited 2013 May 20]. Available from: http://www.icak.or.kr
  3. Cha WC, Lee JS, Kwon W, Lee JS. Chun JY. Assessment Model of a Construction Company's Management Performance. Proceeding of Annual conference of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2008 Oct 25; KwangJu, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Architectural Institute of Korea; 2008. p. 661-4.
  4. Yu IH, Kim KR, Jung YS, Jin SY. Key Performance Indicators for Developing Construction Performance Index. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2005 Feb;21(2):139-50.
  5. Yu IH, Kim KR, Jung YS, Jin SY. Analysis of Quantified Characteristics of the Performance Indicators for Construction Companies. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering & Management. 2006 Aug;7(4):154-63.
  6. Kim MK. A Study on the Management Performance Evaluation Model of Construction Firms [dissertation]. [Su-Won (Korea)]: Kyung Hee University; 2010. 186 p.
  7. Robert S. Seven Strategy Questions: A Simple Approach for Better Execution. Boston: Harvard Business Press Books; 2010. 224 p.
  8. Choi BJ, Choi SW, Kim OK. The Improvement Plan of Quality and Organization Management through the Survey of Actual Condition in Construction Work. Proceeding of Annual conference of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering & Management; 2007 Nov 9; Busan, Korea. Seoul (Korea): Korea Institute of Construction Engineering & Management; 2007. p. 213-8.
  9. Kim SK, Song YS. Cognition Analysis for Managerial and Organizational Status of Domestic Construction Firms. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2005 Jan;21(1):163-70.
  10. Kim YG, Kim SK. Developing an Organization Model through the analysis of Organization Characteristics and Management Performances of Domestic Large Construction Firms. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering & Management. 2004 Oct;5(5):133-53.
  11. An EJ, Ryu BK, Lee YS, Kim JJ. Measuring of the Performance of a Construction Management Project from Viewpoints of Project Participants. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering & Management. 2008 Jun;9(3):194-205.
  12. Shenhar A J, Levy O Dvir D. Mapping the dimensions of project success. Project Management Journal. 1997 Jan;28(2):5-13.
  13. Lim CS, Mohamed M Z. Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. International Journal of Project Management. 1999 Jan;17(4):243-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00040-4
  14. Lee DU, Kim YS. A Study on the Cost Risk Analysis for Construction Projects using Fuzzy-AHP Method. Journal of Korea Institute of Construction Engineering & Management. 2003 Apr;4(1):81-9.
  15. Hsu TH. Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Chinese Fuzzy Systems Association. 1998 Jan;4(1):59-72.
  16. Jang SY, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim JJ. An Analysis on the Stability Fluctuation of Construction Company related Housing Construction Business. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea. 2009 Oct;25(10):217-24.
  17. Whang KS, Park MS, Han JM, Jung JS. Korean Telecommunication Industry: Where we are now and How to go from here. Management Science. 1993 Oct;10(1):41-58.
  18. Saaty RW. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used: Journal of Mathematical Modelling. 1987 Sep;9(3):161-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  19. Zheng QI, Lee DH, Choi JH, Kim SK. A Health Performance Evaluation Model of Building Indoor Air Quality. Journal of the Korea Institute of Ecological Architecture and Environment. 2010 Jun;10(3):3-10.