Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Response Modification Factor of Inverted V-type Braced Steel Frames

역V형 가새골조의 반응수정계수

  • 안형준 (건국대학교 건축대학) ;
  • 김송매 (건국대학교 대학원 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2012.07.30
  • Accepted : 2012.09.21
  • Published : 2013.01.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study of Eccentric Braced Frames have identified the following target eccentricity on the length of the inelastic behavior of the reaction by calculating the correction factor by comparing it to the value suggested by the earthquake provided material for the rational design aims to There are. As a variable-length V-braced frame analysis model stations were set up. Eccentricity faults in the model according to the length stiffness ratio, the maximum amount of energy dissipation were analyzed base shear and multi-layered model of the reaction from the eccentricity correction factor calculated on the length of the building standards proposed by KBC 2009 in response eccentricity correction factor calculated from The length varies. does not have the same response modification factor was confirmed.

철골구조에서 지진력 저항시스템으로 많이 사용되고 있는 가새골조시스템은 중심가새골조(Concentrically Braced Frames, CBF)와 편심가새골조(Eccentrically Braced Frames, EBF)로 구분하여 KBC2009 건축구조기준에서는 서로 다른 반응수정계수를 적용하여 설계하도록 되어있다. 현행 내진설계기준에서 편심가새골조에 대하여 링크 타단 접합부의 종류에 따라 모멘트 저항접합일 경우 반응수정계수는 R=8, 비모멘트 저항접합일 경우 반응수정계수 R=7로 적용하여 설계하도록 규정하고 있을 뿐 편심길이의 영향을 고려하지 않고 있다. 본 연구에서는 편심가새골조 중에서 역V형가새골조를 대상으로 비탄성 거동을 파악한 다음 편심길이에 따른 반응수정계수를 산정하여 내진설계 기준에서 제시한 값과 비교한 결과 편심가새골조에 대하여 동일한 반응수정계수를 적용하는 것은 적절하지 않음을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. AlexH. Barbat, Luis G. Pujades, Nieves Lanada, "Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using the capacity spectrum".
  2. Architectural Institute of Korea, "Design Application with Limit State Design Method for Structural Steel Building", 2002.
  3. ATC, "Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings", ATC-3-06, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, 1978, pp.45-53.
  4. Black, C., Makris, N. and Aiken, I., "Component testing, stability analysis and characterization of buckling restrained unbonded braces", Report No. PEER-2002/08, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley, 2002.
  5. Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, "Study on the Seismic Design Regulations (II)", 1997. (In Korean)
  6. ErolKalkan, SashiK. Kunnath, "Assessment of current nonlinear static procedures for seismic evaluation of buildings", Engineering Structures, vol. 29, No. 1, 2007, pp.305-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.012
  7. Kim Jinkoo, Nam Kwanghee, "Response Modification Factors of Inverted V-type Special Concentrically Braced Frames", Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. vol. 8, No. 1, 2004. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2004.8.1.029
  8. Kim Jinkoo, Nam Kwanghee, "Response Modification Factors of Inverted V-type Ordinary Concentrically Braced Frames", Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea. vol. 8, No. 3, 2004. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2004.8.3.053
  9. Kim Nam Hun, Lee Cheol Ho, "Inelastic Behavior and Seismic Retrofit of Inverted V Braced Steel Frames", International Journal of Steel Structures, vol. 15, No. 1, 2003. (In Korean)
  10. Kim Sang Mo, Kim Pil Jung, Kim Gyu Seok, "A Study on the Strength Evaluation of the K type Braced Steel Frame", Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, vol. 10, No. 1, 1990. (In Korean)
  11. Michel Bruneau & Chia-Ming Uang & Andrew Whitaker, "Ductile Design of Steel Structures", McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1998.
  12. The Korean Structural Engineers Association, "Seismic Design of Steel Buildings per KBC 2009", 2010. (In Korean).