DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Decision of Order Priority of HUD Contents for Public Transit

대중교통 HUD 콘텐츠 우선순위 결정에 관한 연구

  • 박범진 (한국건설기술연구원 첨단교통연구실) ;
  • 강원의 (한국건설기술연구원 첨단교통연구실) ;
  • 김태형 (한국건설기술연구원 첨단교통연구실)
  • Received : 2012.09.19
  • Accepted : 2012.10.08
  • Published : 2013.02.15

Abstract

PURPOSES: In this study, as part of an effort to develop HUD for public transit, it is proposed that the decision of order priority of contents which will be disposed to bus drivers through HUD for public transit using AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) technique. METHODS: In AHP analysis method brainstorming, factor analysis, hierarchical structuring, and weighting analysis were performed by applying a classical analysis method. RESULTS: By the result of analysis it is shown that unlike car drivers, bus drivers prefer information related to bus intervals, bus stop, and door open and close to information related to vehicle running. Also, bus stop information and bus interval information were ranked as first and second place in order priority of HUD contents for public transit by experts. CONCLUSIONS: This method of selecting order priority of HUD contents for public transit can provide a basic foundation for selecting order priority of traffic information contents as well as other HUD contents.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Jae-won, Jung, Hun-young, Jang, Seok-yong, 2011. Development of Decision Making Model of Measures on the Decrease of Traffic Accident Following Implementation of Intra-city Bus by using AHP, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 31(5D):679-687.
  2. Jeon, S. M., 2009. Analysis and Prevention of Bus Traffic Accidents, Final Report, Korea Research Institute of Transportation Industries. (전상민, 2009. 버스교통사고 원인분석 및 예방대책 최종보고서, 한국운수산업연구원.)
  3. Jung, Hyun-young, Lee, Ha-won, Kim, Jang-gyu, 2005. A Study on the Ranking Decision for Construction of Up and Down Convenient Facility in Subway Stations, Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 25(3D):423-428.
  4. Kim, K. H., Cho, S. I., Park, J. H., 2008. Application of Head-Up- Display Technology to Telematics, Electronics and Telecommunications Trends, 23(1):153-162.
  5. Kong, S. J., 2006. Estimating a Relative Importance by AHP - for Improvement at Budget Operation of Defense Reformation Project, Master's Thesis, Korea National Defense University. (공성준, 2006. 계층분석방법에 의한 상대적 중요도 평가 - 방위력개선사업 예산운영시 개선방안에 대하여, 석사학위논문, 국방대학교.)
  6. Lim, S. J., Oh, M. G., 2008. The Improvement of Working Hours for Promoting Traffic Safety in Bus Transportation Business, Transportation Technology and Policy, 5(2):105-127. (임삼진, 오맹근, 2008. 교통안전 증진을 위한 버스운수업 근로시간 개선 방안, 교통기술과 정책, 제5권, 제2호 , pp105-127.)
  7. Moon, Byung-sup, et al, 2011. Developing Head-Up Display in Public Transit, 1st Year Final Report, Korea Institute of Construction Technology.
  8. Moon, H. D., Park, B., 1998. Analysis of Ergonomic Design Requirement for Head-Up Display - On the Presented Item and Icon Type & Color, Journal of Korean Society of Transportation, 16(2):107-114.
  9. Oh, Sang-young, Hong, Hyun-gi, 2007. Combination of Research Methods for Factor Analysis, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 7(10):202-210.
  10. Ryu, J. H., Cho, S. W., Lee, C. G., 2011. The Method of 3D Information Display for Automobile HUD, Journal of Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems, 17(1):12-16. https://doi.org/10.5302/J.ICROS.2011.17.1.12
  11. Song, G. H., Hong, S. Y., Jeong, S. B., Jeon, K. S., 2002. Development of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Solving Dependence Relation between Multicriteria, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(7):15-22.