DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Visibility of Internal Target Volume of Dynamic Tumors in Free-breathing Cone-beam Computed Tomography for Image Guided Radiation Therapy

  • Kauweloa, Kevin I. (Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego) ;
  • Park, Justin C. (Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego) ;
  • Sandhu, Ajay (Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego) ;
  • Pawlicki, Todd (Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego) ;
  • Song, Bongyong (Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego) ;
  • Song, William Y. (Center for Advanced Radiotherapy Technologies and Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego)
  • Received : 2013.11.05
  • Accepted : 2013.12.05
  • Published : 2013.12.31

Abstract

Respiratory-induced dynamic tumors render free-breathing cone-beam computed tomography (FBCBCT) images with motion artifacts complicating the task of quantifying the internal target volume (ITV). The purpose of this paper is to study the visibility of the revealed ITV when the imaging dose parameters, such as the kVp and mAs, are varied. The $Trilogy^{TM}$ linear accelerator with an On-Board Imaging ($OBI^{TM}$) system was used to acquire low-imaging-dose-mode (LIDM: 110 kVp, 20 mA, 20 ms/frame) and high-imaging-dose-mode (HIDM: 125 kVp, 80 mA, 25 ms/frame) FBCBCT images of a 3-cm diameter sphere (density=0.855 $g/cm^3$) moving in accordance to various sinusoidal breathing patterns, each with an unique inhalation-to-exhalation (I/E) ratio, amplitude, and period. In terms of image ITV contrast, there was a small overall average change of the ITV contrast when going from HIDM to LIDM of $6.5{\pm}5.1%$ for all breathing patterns. As for the ITV visible volume measurements, there was an insignificant difference between the ITV of both the LIDM- and HIDM-FBCBCT images with an average difference of $0.5{\pm}0.5%$, for all cases, despite the large difference in the imaging dose (approximately five-fold difference of ~0.8 and 4 cGy/scan). That indicates that the ITV visibility is not very sensitive to changes in imaging dose. However, both of the FBCBCT consistently underestimated the true ITV dimensions by up to 34.8% irrespective of the imaging dose mode due to significant motion artifacts, and thus, this imaging technique is not adequate to accurately visualize the ITV for image guidance. Due to the insignificant impact of imaging dose on ITV visibility, a plausible, alternative strategy would be to acquire more X-ray projections at the LIDM setting to allow 4DCBCT imaging to better define the ITV, and at the same time, maintain a reasonable imaging dose, i.e., comparable to a single HIDM-FBCBCT scan.

Keywords

References

  1. Vedam SS, Keall PJ, Kini VR, et al: Acquiring a four-dimensional computed tomography dataset using an external respiratory signal. Phys Med Biol 48(1):45-62 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/48/1/304
  2. Lu W, Parikh PJ, Hubenschmidt JP, et al: A comparison between amplitude sorting and phase angle sorting using external respiratory measurement for 4DCT. Med Phys 33(8):2964-2974 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2219772
  3. Keall PJ: 4-Dimensional computed tomography imaging and treatment planning. Semin Radiat Oncol 14(1):81-90 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semradonc.2003.10.006
  4. Low DA, Nystrom M, Kalinin F, et al: A method for the reconstruction of four-dimensional synchronized CT scans acquired during free breathing. Med Phys 30(6):1254-1263 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1576230
  5. Fitzpatrick MJ, Starkschall G, Antolak JA: Displacementbased binning of time-dependent computed tomography image data sets. Med Phys 33(1):235-246 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2044427
  6. Wink NM, Panknin C, Soldberg TD: Phase versus amplitude sorting of 4D-CT data. J Appl Clin Med Phys 7(1):77-85 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.2027.25373
  7. Ruan D, Fessler JA, Balter JM: Mean position tracking of respiratory motion. Med Phys 35(2):782-792 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2825616
  8. Underberg RW, Lagerwaard FJ, Cuijpers JP, et al: Fourdimensional CT scans for treatment planning in stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:1283-1290 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.07.665
  9. Jin JY, Ajlouni M, Chen Q, et al: A technique of using gated-CT images to determine internal target volume (ITV) for fractionated stereotactic lung radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 78:177-184 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2005.11.012
  10. Purdie TG, Bissonnette JP, Franks K, et al: Cone-beam computed tomography for on-line image guidance of lung stereotactic radiotherapy: Localization, verification, and intrafraction tumor position. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(1):243-252 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.022
  11. Yeung AR, Li JG, Shi W, et al: Tumor localization using cone-beam CT reduces setup margins in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74(4):1100-1107 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.048
  12. Grills IS, Hugo G, Kestin LL, et al: Image-guided radiotherapy via daily online cone-beam CT substantially reduces margin requirements for stereotactic lung radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(4):1045-1056 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2352
  13. Yin FF, Wang Z, Yoo S, et al: Integration of cone-beam CT in stereotactic body radiation therapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 7(2):133-139 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1177/153303460800700206
  14. Yin FF, Wang Z, Yoo S, et al: In-room radiographic imaging for localization. Proceedings AAPM Summer School Integrating New Technologies into the Clinic: Monte Carlo and Image Guided Radiation Therapy. 2006, Ontario, Canada
  15. Thilmann C, Nill S, Tucking T, et al: Correction of patient positioning errors based on in-line cone beam CTs: clinical implementation and first experiences. Radiother Oncol 1:16 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-1-16
  16. Li T, Schreibmann E, Yang Y, et al: Motion correction for improved target localization with on-board cone-beam computed tomography. Phys Med Biol 51:253-267 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/51/2/005
  17. Duggan DM, Ding GX, Coffey CW, et al: Deep-inspiration breath-hold kilovoltage cone-beam CT for setup of stereotactic body radiation therapy for lung tumors: Initial experience. Lung Cancer 56(1):77-88 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.11.012
  18. Yin FF, Das S, Kirkpatrick J, et al: Physics and imaging for targeting of oligometastases. Semin Radiat Oncol 16(2):85-101 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.12.004
  19. Vergalasova I, Maurer J, Yin FF: Potential underestimation of the internal target volume (ITV) from free-breathing CBCT. Med Phys 38(8):4689-4699 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3613153
  20. Buzug TM: Computed Tomography: From Photon Statistics to Modern Cone-Beam CT. 1st ed, Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg (2008) pp. 521
  21. Hsieh J: Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances. 2nd ed, SPIE/John Wiley & Songs, Inc. (2009) pp. 556
  22. Li T, Xing L: Optimizing 4D cone-beam CT acquisition protocol for external beam radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(4):1211-1219 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.024
  23. Song WY, Kamath S, Ozawa S, et al: A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems. Med Phys 35(2):480-486 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2825619
  24. Sonke JJ, Zijp L, Remeijer P, et al: Respiratory correlated cone beam CT. Med Phys 32(4):1176-1186 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1869074
  25. Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, et al: Abdominal CT with low Tube Voltage: Preliminary Observations about Radiation Dose, Contrast Enhancement, Image Quality, and Noise. Radiology 237(3):945-951 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373041655
  26. Hsieh J: Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive x-ray photon noise. Med Phys 25(11):2139-2147 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598410