DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement and Analysis of Dust Concentration in a Fattening Pig House Considering Respiratory Welfare of Pig Farmers

비육돈사 작업 종사자의 호흡기 관련 공기 중 분진 농도 측정 및 분석

  • 권경석 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원) ;
  • 이인복 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원) ;
  • 황현섭 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원) ;
  • 하태환 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원) ;
  • 하정수 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원) ;
  • 박세준 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원) ;
  • 조예슬 (서울대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역시스템공학과 & 농업생명과학 연구원)
  • Received : 2013.07.20
  • Accepted : 2013.08.21
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

In swine house, dust generation comes from various sources and is known to be harmful both for the animals and the farmers because the dust contains biological and gaseous matters. When farmers are constantly exposed to the dusts, they can suffer chronic or acute respiratory symptoms and have high probability of manifesting various diseases. To address this problem, understanding of the mechanism of dust generation is very important. In this paper, the dust concentration of inhalable, respirable, TSP and $PM_{10}$ were monitored and analyzed according to the pig-activity level, ventilation quantity and feeding method in fattening pig house. From the measured results, in case of the concentration of TSP, an inverse-linear relation with ventilation rate ($R^2=0.88$) and linear relation with the installation height of feed supply pipe ($R^2=0.73$) were determined. However in case of the concentration of $PM_{10}$, no particular relationship with the variables was observed. Using the concentration of inhalable and respirable dust based on the pig-activity level, multi-variate regression analysis was conducted and results have shown that the movement of pigs can contribute to the dust generation (p<0.05, $R^2=0.71$, 0.61). The relationship determined between dust generation and environmental variables investigated in this study is very significant and useful in conducting dust-reduction researches.

Keywords

References

  1. Cambra-Lopez, M., J. A. A. Andre, Z. Yang, C. Salvador, G. T. Antonio, 2010. Airborne particulate matter from livestock production systems: A review of an air pollution problem. Environmental Pollution 158(2010): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.07.011
  2. CIGR, 1994, Aerial environmental in animal housing. Concentration in and emissions from farm buildings. CIGR Working Group Report 94.1: 83-112.
  3. Donham, K. J., M. J. Rubino, T. D. Thedell, J. Kammermeyer, 1977. Potential health hazards of workers in swine confinement building. Journal of Occupational Medicine 19: 383-387. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-197706000-00004
  4. Donham, K. J., 1986. Hazardous agents in agricultural dusts and methods of evaluation. American Journal in Medicine 10: 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700100305
  5. Donham, K. J., S. J. Reynolds, P. Whitten, J. A. Merchant, L. Burmeister, 1995. Respiratory Dysfunction in Swine Production Facility Worker: Dose-response relationship of environmental exposure and pulmonary function. American Journal in Medicine 27: 405-418. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700270309
  6. EPA, 2004, Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter, vol II: 1148. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.
  7. Gloster, J., W. Paul, D. Claudia, E. Isabel, C. Hugh, V. Jean-Francois, 2007. Foot-and-mouth disease- Quantification and size distribution of airborne particles emitted by healthy and infected pigs. The Veterinary Journal 174(2007): 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2006.05.020
  8. Heber, A. J., M. Stroik, J. M. Faubion, L. H. Willard, 1988. Size distribution and identification of aerial dust particles in swine finishing buildings. Transactions of the ASAE 31(3): 882-887. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30794
  9. Honey, L. F., J. B. McQuitty, 1979. Some physical factors affecting dust concentrations in a pig facility. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 21(1): 9-14.
  10. Radon, K., C. Weber, M. Iversen, B. Danuser, S. Pedersen, D. Nowak, 2001. Exposure assessment and lung function in pig and poultry farmers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 58(6): 405-410. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.6.405
  11. Reynolds, S. J., K. J. Donham, P. Whitten, J. A. Merchant, L. F. Burmeister, 1996. Longitudinal evaluation of dose-response relationships for environmental exposures and pulmonary function in swine production workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1996 (29): 33-40.
  12. Statistics Korea, 2013, http://www.kosta.go.kr Accessed 6 June 2013.
  13. Takai, H., S. Pedersen, J. O. Johnsen, J. H. M. Metz, P. W. G. Groot Koerkamp, G. H. Uenk, V. R. Phillips, M. R. Holden, R. W. Sneath, J. L. Short, R. P. White, J. Hartung, J. Seedorf, M. Schroder, K. H. Linkert, C. M. Wathes, 1998. Concentration and Emissions of Airborne Dust in Livestock Buildings in Northern Europe. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 1998(70): 59-77.
  14. Kim, K. Y., C. N. Kim, 2003. Fluctuation of indoor air pollutants emitted from enclosed pig building in winter, Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Environmental Hygiene 13(3): 191-197 (in Korean).
  15. Yoo, D. H., H. A. Kim, Y. Heo, J. H. Sung, H. K. Lee, Y. G. Park, 2003. Concentration of Dusts and Endotoxin in Swine Confinement Buildings, Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Environmental Hygiene 13(1): 45-52 (in Korean).