DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Hydrology and Snowmelt by Applying RCP Scenarios using SWAT Model for Hanriver Watersheds

SWAT 모델링을 이용한 한강유역의 RCP 시나리오에 따른 미래수문 및 융설 영향평가

  • 정충길 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 문장원 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 장철희 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실) ;
  • 이동률 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원연구실)
  • Received : 2013.06.10
  • Accepted : 2013.08.22
  • Published : 2013.09.30

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the impact of potential climate change on the hydrological components, especially on the streamflow, evapotranspiration and snowmelt, by using the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for 17 Hanriver middle watersheds of South Korea. For future assessment, the SWAT model was calibrated in multiple sites using 4 years (2006-2009) and validated by using 2 years (2010-2011) daily observed data. For the model validation, the Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency (NSE) for streamflow were 0.30-0.75. By applying the future scenarios predicted five future time periods Baseline (1992-2011), 2040s (2021-2040), 2060s (2041-2060), 2080s (2061-2080) and 2100s (2081-2100) to SWAT model, the 17 middle watersheds hydrological components of evapotranspiration, streamflow and snowmelt were evaluated. For the future precipitation and temperature of RCP 4.5 scenario increased 41.7 mm (2100s), $+3^{\circ}C$ conditions, the future streamflow showed +32.5 % (2040s), +24.8 % (2060s), +50.5 % (2080s) and +55.0 % (2100s). For the precipitation and temperature of RCP 8.5 scenario increased 63.9 mm (2100s), $+5.8^{\circ}C$ conditions, the future streamflow showed +35.5 % (2040s), +68.9 % (2060s), +58.0 % (2080s) and +63.6 % (2100s). To determine the impact on snowmelt for Hanriver middle watersheds, snowmelt parameters of SWAT model were determined through evaluating observed streamflow data during snowmelt periods (November-April). The results showed that average SMR (snowmelt / runoff) of 17 Hanriver middle watersheds was 62.0 % (Baseline). The annual average SMR were 42.0 % (2040s), 39.8 % (2060s), 29.4 % (2080s) and 27.9 % (2100s) by applying RCP 4.5 scenario. Also, the annual average SMR by applying RCP 8.5 scenario were 40.1 % (2040s), 29.4 % (2060s), 18.3 % (2080s) and 12.7 % (2100s).

Keywords

References

  1. Back, H. J., C. H. Cho, W. T. Kwon, S. K. Kim, J. Y. Cho, and Y. S. Kim, 2011. Development strategy for new climate change scenarios based on RCP. Korea Climate Change Research 2(1): 55-68 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1248.2011.00055
  2. Chung, S. O., 2012. Projection of paddy rice consumptive use in the major plains of the Korean peninsula under the RCP scenarios. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 54(5): 35-41 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2012.54.5.035
  3. Cloutier V., R. Lefebvre, R. Therrien, and M. M. Savard, 2008. Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. Journal of Hydrology 353: 294-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.015
  4. Davis, J. C., 1986. Statistics and data analysis in Geology. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
  5. Guler, C., G. D. Thyne, J. E. McCray, and A. K. Turner, 2002. Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeology Journal 10: 455-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-002-0196-6
  6. Kim, D. G., J. U. Jeong, J. H. Park, and C. G. Park, 2007. Long-term runoff simulation in consideration of snow pack and snow melt. Journal of the Korean Society of Water and Wastewater 21(3): 265-272 (in Korean).
  7. Kim, J. S., and C. U. Choi, 2013. Impact of changes in climate and land use/land cover change under climate change scenario on streamflow in the basin. Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information System 21(2): 107-116 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2013.21.2.107
  8. Kim, N. W., B. J. Lee, and J. E. Lee, 2006. An evaluation of snowmelt effects using SWAT in Chungju dam basin. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association 39(10): 833-844 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2006.39.10.833
  9. Kim, S. B, 2013. Assessment of future climate change impacts on snowmelt and stream water quality for mountainous watershed using SWAT. Master's. D. thesis, Konkuk University (in Korean).
  10. Lee, B. J., I. W. Jung, and D. H. Bae, 2009. Parameter regionalization of semi-distributed runoff model Using multivariate statistical analysis. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association 42(2): 149-160 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.2.149
  11. Park, J. Y., M. S. Lee, Y. J. Lee, and S. J. Kim, 2008. The analysis of future land use change impact on hydrology and water quality using SWAT model. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 28(2B): 187-197 (in Korean).
  12. Park, J. Y., M. J. Park, S. R. Ahn, and S. J. Kim, 2009. Watershed modeling for assessing climate change impact on stream water quality of Chungju dam watershed. Journal of the Korea Water Resources Association 42 (10): 877-889 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.10.877
  13. Park, M. J., 2011. Projection of Hydrologic response and stream water quality considering climate and land use change. Ph. D. diss., Konkuk University (in Korean).
  14. Rho, H. J., 2005. Multivariate data analysis with theory and practice. Seoul: Hyungseul.
  15. Ribeiro, L., and M. E. Macedo, 1995. Application of multivariate statistics, trend and cluster analysis to groundwater quality in the Tejo and Sado aquifer. in: groundwater Quality: Remediation and Protection. Proceeding of the Prague Conference, 39-47. May 1995. IAHS publ. 225.
  16. Schot, P. P., and J. van der Wal, 1992. Human impact on regional groundwater composition through intervention in natural flow pattens and changes in land use. Journal of Hydrology 134: 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(92)90040-3
  17. Steinhorst, R. K., and R. E. Williams, 1985. Discrimination of groundwater sources using cluster analysis, MANOVA, canonical analysis and discriminant analysis. Water Resources Research 21: 1149-1156. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR021i008p01149