Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Bone Formation Potency on the Titanium Cap According to the Pore on the Rabbit Calvarium

가토의 두개골에서 Pore의 유무에 따른 티타늄 반구에서의 골형성 능

  • Park, Jung-Pyo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Chul-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Seunggon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ryu, Sun-Youl (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 박정표 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오철중 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정승곤 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 박홍주 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오희균 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 유선열 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 국민석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Received : 2012.05.17
  • Accepted : 2013.01.08
  • Published : 2013.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study is performed to determine the effects of titanium cap with various sizes of pores on bone formation during guided bone regeneration (GBR). Methods: Calvaria from 10 adult male rabbits were chosen as the recipient sites. A trephine bur with a diameter of 10 mm was used to form one round groove on each side of sagittal suture of the cranium, and a round bur with a diameter of 1.5 mm was used to form 6 small holes on the inner circles of round grooves to induce bleeding. In the control group, bone graft was not conducted, and closed titanium cap was fixed in the round groove. Bone graft was not performed in groups 1 and 2, but fixed on titanium caps with 0.2 mm, and 0.5 mm sized pores, respectively. For groups 3, 4, and 5, a synthetic bone graft material (${\beta}$-tricalcium phosphate, Cerasorb$^{(R)}$, Germany) was transplanted, and titanium caps without pore, with 0.2 mm and 0.5 mm sized pore were fixed, respectively. The animals were sacrificed 4 weeks after, and clinical, radiographical, and histomorphometrical evaluation of bone regeneration was performed. Results: In all groups, there were no clinical signs of infection, inflammation or wound dehiscence. Radiographic evaluation revealed well-defined semi-circular radiopacity inside the titanium cap of groups 3, 4, and 5. Histologically, the inner surface of the hemisphere was evenly lined with newly formed bone tissue, as well as grafted bone material in the group 3. In groups 4 and 5, the insertion of connective tissue was observed along the inner surface. However, the overall surface area between the grafts with different holes yielded no statistical significance in the histomorphometrical evaluation. Conclusion: Although the total area of newly formed bone showed no significant difference, excellent bone formation tendency was observed histologically when closed caps were used with bone graft was accompanied.

Keywords

References

  1. Nishida T, Yamada Y, Murai M, Shimizu Y, Oshikawa M, Ito K. Effects of bioactive glass on bone augmentation within a titanium cap in rabbit parietal bone. J Periodontol 2006;77:983-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050170
  2. Dahlin C. Scientific background of guided bone regeneration. In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK, editors. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1994. p.31-48.
  3. Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Augmentation of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050203.x
  4. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  5. Yamada Y, Nanba K, Ito K. Effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope in the rabbit calvarium. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:455-63. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00832.x
  6. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993;2:158-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199309000-00003
  7. Velich N, Nemeth Z, Toth C, Szabo G. Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:38-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200401000-00013
  8. Frayssinet P, Trouillet JL, Rouquet N, Azimus E, Autefage A. Osseointegration of macroporous calcium phosphate ceramics having a different chemical composition. Biomaterials 1993;14:423-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(93)90144-Q
  9. Ozawa M. Experimental study on bone conductivity and absorbability of the pure β-TCP. J Jap Soc Biomater 1995;13:17-25.
  10. Casati MZ, Sallum EA, Nociti FH Jr, Caffesse RG, Sallum AW. Enamel matrix derivative and bone healing after guided bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects around implants. A histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 2002;73:789-96. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.7.789
  11. Linde A, Thoren C, Dahlin C, Sandberg E. Creation of new bone by an osteopromotive membrane technique: an experimental study in rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:892-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80111-9
  12. Van Steenberghe D, Johansson C, Quirynen M, Molly L, Albrektsson T, Naert I. Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:63-71. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140109.x
  13. Schmid J, Wallkamm B, Hämmerle CH, Gogolewski S, Lang NP. The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:244-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080311.x
  14. Assenza B, Piattelli M, Scarano A, Lezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Localized ridge augmentation using titanium micromesh. J Oral Implantol 2001;27:287-92. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0287:LRAUTM>2.3.CO;2
  15. von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous peri-implant bone grafting using a micro titanium mesh for graft stabilization. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:117-27.
  16. Lundgren D, Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Nyman S. Augmentation of intramembraneous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. An experimental study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060201.x
  17. Lundgren A, Lundgren D, Taylor A. Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:251-60. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090406.x
  18. Lee KH, Kwon YH, Park JB, Herr Y. Effect of pore number of titanium mesh on bone formation in the procedure of GBR. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2004;34:411-24. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2004.34.2.411
  19. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 2005;36 Suppl 3:S20-7.
  20. Gaasbeek RD, Toonen HG, van Heerwaarden RJ, Buma P. Mechanism of bone incorporation of beta-TCP bone substitute in open wedge tibial osteotomy in patients. Biomaterials 2005;26:6713-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.056
  21. Horch HH, Sader R, Pautke C, Neff A, Deppe H, Kolk A. Synthetic, pure-phase beta-tricalcium phosphate ceramic granules (Cerasorb) for bone regeneration in the reconstructive surgery of the jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:708-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.03.017