Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture (한국유기농업학회지)

Korean Association of Organic Agriculture (한국유기농업학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Valuation and Preference of Urban Agriculture Park using Choice Experiment

도시농업공원 조성에 대한 선호와 가치평가

  • Received : 2013.04.11
  • Accepted : 2013.06.21
  • Published : 2013.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Purpose of this paper is to estimates consumers' willingness to pay for Urban Agriculture Park attributes. we analysis the marginal WTP by choice experiment method. Choice experiment (CE) is designed to elicit the marginal WTP differences among urban agriculture park attributes (garden scales, learning and experience area, leisure and relaxation area and fund). The results of multinomial logit model are meaningful, the total marginal WTP on the urban agriculture park attributes is 18,852 won. gardens scales is 2,949 won, learning and experience area is 11,284 won, leisure and relaxation area is 4,619 won. In the current laws, the facilities related to urban agriculture park is not. Taking advantage of the new urban agriculture park, Amendments of the law is required.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere. 1998. Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 80: 64-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180269
  2. GRI. 2012. Revitalization Planning of Urban Agriculture in Gyeonggi-Do.
  3. Kim, J. H. 2010. Economic Valuation of the Taewa Field Ecological Park: An Application of a Contingent Valuation Method with Preference Uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Policy. 9(1): 109-135. https://doi.org/10.17330/joep.9.1.201003.109
  4. Kim, T. K. and N. K. Hong. 2005. Measuring the Willingness to pay for Food- Safety Attributes. The Korean Journal of Agricultural Economics. 46(2): 181-196.
  5. LH. 2011. Planning Strategies for Urban Farming in the Development Project Areas.
  6. Lusk, J. L., J. Roosen, and J. A. Fox. 2003. Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 85: 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00100
  7. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge Univ Press.
  8. MAF. 2012. A Study on Urban Agriculture Promotion and Multi-functionality.
  9. RIG.GRI. 2009. Conservation Values of Major Resources in the Korean DMZ and Its Vicinity.
  10. Yun, H. J. and M. K. Cho. 2012. The Consideration of Progressive Urban Park and The Possibility of Urban Agricultural Park. Korean Society of Rural Planning. 18(2): 81-90. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2012.18.2.081