Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Development of Intervention Program for Enhancing Elementary Science-Poor Students' Basic Science Process Skills - Focus on Eye Movement Analysis -

초등과학부진학생의 기초과학탐구능력 향상을 위한 중재프로그램 개발 -안구운동을 중심으로-

  • Received : 2014.11.26
  • Accepted : 2014.12.26
  • Published : 2014.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop an intervention program for improvement of elementary science-poor students' Basic Science Process Skill (BSPS) and to validate the intervention program's effectiveness using eye-tracker. The participants of this study were 35 elementary science-poor students. This study's method was the analysis of real-time eye movements during basic science process skill problem solving. SMI's 120 Hz iView XTM RED was used to collect EMD (eye movement data). Experiment 3.4 and BeGaze 3.4 programs were used to design experiment and to analyze EMD. The results of this study are as follows. First, we developed an intervention program including BSPS instructional strategy, behavior of teachers & student according instructional strategy stage, teachinglearning plan and learning note. Second, science poor students' BSPS ability has improved statistically significantly through the application of intervention program and BSPS problem-solving time decreased statistically significantly. Third, AFT (average fixation time) of BSPS Question and keyword area decreased statistically significantly. Fourth, APD (average pupil diameter) of BSPS problem-solving process expanded statistically significantly. Fifth, AST (average saccade time) of BSPS problem-solving process increased statistically significantly. Sixth, AFET (average fixation entry time) of BSPS problem-clue area was accelerated statistically significantly, AFT of BSPS problem-clue area reduced statistically significantly.

이 연구는 초등과학부진학생들의 기초과학탐구능력을 향상하기 위해 중재프로그램을 개발하고 안구추적기를 활용해 중재프로그램의 효과를 검증하는데 있다. 연구 참여자는 초등과학부진학생 35명이었다. 안구운동추적기는 SMI사의 iView XTM RED로 고정형이고 샘플링 속도는 120 Hz이었다. 실험을 설계하고 분석하기 위해 Experiment 3.4와 BeGaze 3.4 프로그램을 사용하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째 기초탐구 교수전략, 교사 학생 행동, 교수-학습지도안, 학습 활동지를 포함하여 중재프로그램을 개발하였다. 둘째, 중재프로그램 적용결과 기초과학탐구능력이 향상되었고 전체 문제해결시간이 통계적으로 유의미하게 줄어들었다. 셋째, 기초과학탐구 문제영역과 핵심단어에 대한 평균응시시간이 통계적으로 유의미하게 감소하였다. 넷째, 기초과학탐구문제해결과정에서 동공 크기(pupil diameter)가 통계적으로 유의미하게 확장되었다. 다섯째, 기초과학탐구문제해결과정에서 평균도약시간(average saccade time)은 통계적으로 유의미하게 증가하였다. 여섯째, 문제 단서영역에 대한 평균응시도입시간(average fixation entry time)은 통계적으로 유의미하게 빨라졌고, 평균응시시간은 통계적으로 유의미하게 줄어들었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrew, D. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: theory and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  3. Borich, G. (2010). Effective teaching methods: research-based practice(7th edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  4. Choi, H. D., Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2012). Differences in eye movement pattern during the classification between the gifted and general students in elementary schools. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(4), 501-512.
  5. Choi, H. D., Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2014). The comparison of eye movement in measuring tasks between the underachievers and the overachievers. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(1), 181-194. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2014.33.1.181
  6. Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N., & Carter, G. (2011). Comparing visual representation of DNA in two multimedia presentations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 20(1), 21-42.
  7. Daniel K., & Jackson B. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154, 1583-1585. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3756.1583
  8. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211-245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
  9. Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Saljo, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualization: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
  10. Hackling, M. W., & Garnett, P. J. (1995). The development of expertise in science investigation skills. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 41(4), 80-86.
  11. Haider, H., & Frensch, P. A. (1999). Eye movement during skill acquisition: more evidence for the information reduction hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 172-190. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.172
  12. Hallahan, D. P., & Lloyd, J. W. (1987). Self-monitoring of attention: a reply to snider. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(2), 153-156. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510222
  13. Hallahan, D. P., Lloyd, J. W., Kosiewicz, M. M., Kauffman, J. M., & Graves, A. W. (1979). Self-monitoring of attention as treatment for a learning disabled boy's off-task behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2(3), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511021
  14. Hess, E. H. (1965). Attitude and pupil size. Scientific American, 212(2), 46-54.
  15. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, 349. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.132.3423.349
  16. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 140, 1190.
  17. Holmqvist, K., NystrOm, M., Anderson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye Tracking : a comprehensive guide to methods and measures. New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Jho, H. K., & Song, J. W. (2011). The observation type of primary students and the effect of their views of science on observation activity in anomalous situation. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 405-414.
  19. Jo, Y. G., Shim, M. J., Lee, E. H., Lee, J. G., Son, Y. A., & Park, S., H. (2009). Instructional strategy. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  20. Keller, J. M. (1993). Motivation by design. Tallahassee, FL: John Keller Associate.
  21. Kenneth A. Lane, O. F. (2005). Developing ocular motor and visual perceptual skills: an activity workbook. New Jersey: SLACK, INC.
  22. Kim D. G. (2010). Learning strategy program for attention. Seoul: Hakjisa.
  23. Kim, K. M., Cha, H. Y., & Ku, S. A. (2011). Differences in classification skills between the gifted and regular students in elementary schools. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 31(5), 709-719.
  24. Kundel, H. L., Nodine, C. F., Conant, E. F., & Weinstein, S. P. (2007). Holistic component of image perception in mammogram interpretation: gaze-tracking study. Radiology, 242, 396-402. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2422051997
  25. Kwon, J. S., & Kim, B. K. (1994). The development of an instrument for the measurement of science process skills of the Korean elementary and middle school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(3), 251-264.
  26. Lee, B. W. (2005). Analysis of inquiry standards in foreign national science curricula. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(7), 873-884.
  27. Lee, B. W., & Kim, H. K. (2007). An analysis of observation and measurement standards in foreign national science curriculums. Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 87-96.
  28. Lee, H. J., Lee, G. K., & Kwon, Y. J. (2010). A study on observation knowledge generation using the scientific observation strategy in 6th grade students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 30(1), 13-26.
  29. Lee, H. W., Min, B. M., & Son, Y. A. (2012). Development and application of the explicit and reflective learning strategy for enhancement of the elementary school students' basic inquiry skills; -based on observation and classification-. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.095
  30. Lim, C. S. (2005). A brain-based approach to science teaching and learning: a successive integration model of the structures and functions of human brain and the affective, psychomotor, and cognitive domains of school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(1), 86-101.
  31. Lim, C. S. (2009). Development of model of brain-based evolutionary scientific teaching for learning. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 29(8), 990-1010.
  32. Meichebaum, D. (1977). Cognitive-behavior modification: an integrative approach. New York: Plenum press.
  33. Poplin, M. S. (1988). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(7), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948802100702
  34. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
  35. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  36. Shin, D. H., Shin, J. J., & Kwon, T. J. (2006). An analysis in the processes of observation teaching and the types of observation in elementary life science classes. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(4), 339-351.
  37. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2012). Eye movement analysis on elementary teachers' understanding process of science textbook graphs. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(3), 386-397.
  38. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2013a). Analysis of eye movement by the science achievement level of the elementary students on observation test. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(2), 185-197.
  39. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2013b). Development of the heuristic attention model based on analysis of eye movement of elementary school students on discrimination task. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 33(7), 1471-1485. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1471
  40. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2014a). Analysis of elementary students' eye movement in science problems solving process applying multiple representation. Biology Education, 41(4), 544-555.
  41. Shin, W. S., & Shin, D. H. (2014b). Comparative study of high and low students on science process skills. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 67th Summer Conference, 95.
  42. Snowden, R., Tnompson, P., & Troscianko, T. (2012). Basic vision : an introduction to visual perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
  43. Swanson, H. (1989). Strategy instruction: overview of principles and procedures for effective use. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 3-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1510248
  44. The Ministry of Education. (2014). Elementary science 3th-4th group guidebook for teacher. Seoul: Mirae-N.
  45. Yang, C. H., Lee, J. H., Kim, Y. H., & Noh, T. H. (2011). Elementary students' epistemological views on the nature of scientific measurement. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 430-441.
  46. Yang, I. H., & Kim, H. (2004). Analysis of elementary students' confidence about measuring results. Science Education Research Institute Korea National University of Education, 14(1), 149-169.

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Relationship Between Elementary School Students' Brain Preference and external representation form of science learning materials vol.43, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2015.43.1.70
  2. 과학탐구 수업실행 전문성 요소에 의한 '과학탐구' 관련 연구동향 분석 vol.61, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2017.61.4.197
  3. Analysis of Visual Attention according to the Career of the Teachers in Elementary Science Lecture-centered Class - Focused on the 5th Grade Unit of the Function and Structure of Our Body - vol.46, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.1.154
  4. 탐구형 초등과학수업 '호흡' 차시에서 교사의 경력에 따른 교수행동 및 시각적 주의 분석 vol.37, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.2.206
  5. 뇌기반 진화적 접근법을 적용한 초등학생 수준별 자유탐구 안내자료 개발 및 효과 vol.37, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.233
  6. 초등과학교육에서 인공지능의 적용방안 연구 vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.1.117
  7. 교사 참여형 교육프로그램(TPEP)을 경험한 초등교사의 과학 수업 전문성 변화 사례 - 시각적 주의를 중심으로 - vol.39, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.1.133
  8. 초등 생물분류 학습에서 인공지능 융합교육의 적용 사례 연구 vol.39, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.2.284